Sentences with phrase «vote no matter who»

Not exact matches

And they will vote for this president no matter what... These are people who pay no income tax.»

«There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what.

As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote on that matter in their discretion.

Banks, brokers, and other nominees who do not receive instructions from you regarding the ratification of the appointment of independent accountants may generally vote on that matter in their discretion.

As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote your Shares on that matter in their discretion.

It doesn't even matter if he is giving the people what they want — as unlikely as it is that the people who voted for Donald Trump for president did so because they love Thursday night cliffhangers about who will be the next secretary of housing and urban development.

These responsibilities include: (i) fostering processes that allow the Board to function independently of management and encouraging open and effective communication between the Board and management of the Company; (ii) providing input to the Chairman on behalf of the independent Directors with respect to Board agendas; (iii) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, as well as regularly scheduled executive sessions of independent Directors; (iv) in the case of a conflict of interest involving a Director, if appropriate, asking the conflicted Director to leave the room during discussion concerning such matter and, if appropriate, asking such Director to recuse him or herself from voting on the relevant matter; (v) communicating with the Chairman and the CEO, as appropriate, regarding meetings of the independent Directors and resources and information necessary for the Board to effectively carry out its duties and responsibilities; (vi) serving as liaison between the Chairman and the independent Directors; (vii) being available to Directors who have concerns that can not be addressed through the Chairman; (viii) having the authority to call meetings of the independent Directors; and (ix) performing other functions as may reasonably be requested by the Board or the Chairman.

No matter who you vote for... Too me they have all been pre-screened and they are just saying what we «want» to hear...

No matter who you vote for, The Republicans represent the reason for America to become a third world nation.

«There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what.

Does it matter that 177 Democrats voted against the bill to punish surgeons who kill babies who survive abortions?

Because you'd vote for a Republican no matter who he or she is?

I WO N'T VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO LIES TO ME, NO MATTER HOW NICE HIS HAIR IS.

Which only proves that 69 % of people who vote on baseball matters on the ESPN....

I do not think that the people who are voting to have this building so close to the WTC site, or in New City at all for that matter, are even thinking with their brains.

You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your vote matters is by voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?

It does not matter in any ultimate sense who controls the House or the Senate, who sits in the White House, or what confected micro-identity votes en masse for which candidate.

If you really believe Obama is responsible for the mess then the best thing to do is vote for him as the mess is coming no matter who is President.

George Hunt, ponders the ways in which Catholics vote in elections and comes up with this: «One sobering conclusion to all this: Beware all commentators who speak airily of the «Catholic» vote — or a uniform «Catholic» anything, for that matter.»

Btw... im a registered independent (both big parties are unbiblical in my opinion) and im really considering writing in mickey mouse, esp since im in SF so it really does nt matter who i vote for, Obama will win.

And in fact, age still matters: the oldest cohort of Catholics, those who came of age during the New Deal, voted the most Democratic in 1996.

Two - thirds of white evangelicals (64 %) said they would be more likely to vote for someone who had served in the military, while 29 percent said it didn't matter.

Four in 10 white evangelicals (41 %) said they were less likely to vote for someone who had personal financial troubles; about half said it didn't matter (49 %).

Like Rockefeller said when they created the federal reserve...» it doesn't matter now who you vote for now, you're always voting for us»

I would like to vote Republican but my fear of closed minded bible thumpers who want to set back our education system, social reforms, free thought and our culture as a whole, outweighs my fear of skyrocketing national debt, slow economic growth and higher taxes (incidentally higher taxes are coming no matter who is in power.

I GUARANTEE YOU that the churches are mobilizing to vote GOP no matter who it is.

JW That may be true; however, any Republic state will vote Republican no matter who is running.

I don't know much about Rubio yet, but anyone who thinks science is a matter of opinion has lost my vote.

The conservative lawyers who screen the candidates for judgeships seek to be prudent by nimbly avoiding anything so plain and direct as asking the candidates exactly how they would vote on these matters.

Funny, but when Clinton won his elections, no one seemed to question who I voted for, so race seems to matter for some people.

At all times, the interested director, officer or staff member who has disclosed the conflict must refrain from attempting to influence the deliberations or voting on the matter and may not participate in or be present for the deliberations or vote on the matter.

Finally, after a moment of reflection, he broke it down matter of factly to this guy from Manhattan who had trained down to his town to get out the vote: «You cut a sub, you don't cut a hoagie.»

Mostly, they're just a bunch of people who think a vote for Jack Morris is a vote against Alan Trammell or Tim Raines, and who are persistent in their frustration that, no matter how many facts they marshal in response, another voter will pop and spout a bunch of bullshit about Morris just knowing how to win.

It was ordinary human beings who went into the voting booth and recognized that we should all be able to marry whomever we choose, no matter the gender.

Although all of the Oak Lawn votes had not yet been counted late Wednesday, voters there were rejecting the measure by better than a 2 - 1 ratio, stunning Park District officials who had seen them overwhelmingly approve an advisory referendum on the matter in November 2004.

Algonquin resident Larry Mountain, one of about a dozen people who attended Wednesday's gathering when the master plan was unveiled, said he thinks Algonquin citizens also might vote down a tax hike for more recreational services no matter who runs them.

If I do decide to do it, I've got my policies, I know what I want to stand for, and if you can get that across to the public it doesn't matter who you are; if they agree with you, they will vote for you.»

It's worked in the past, at least according to the «What's the Matter with Kansas» argument, since for a generation conservative activists have voted for Republicans who've instituted corporate - and wealth - friendly policies once in office while largely giving lip service to moral issues and libertarian priorities.

Having been let down by one side, then the other, they have come to the conclusion that it doesn't matter who they vote for, so why bother.

But the DRC has rules and procedures, and one of them is that candidates who don't pre-interview don't get voted on at the straw poll — no matter who they are or how popular they might be.

But Long, who received the state Conservative Party's unanimous endorsement yesterday, and so will be on the November general election ballot no matter what happens in the GOP primary (unless there's a post-primary deal, a la Paladino - Lazio 2010), was careful not to offer a full - throated endorsement of Ryan's proposal — or to say she would vote for it if she had the opportunity — saying she needs more time to review it.

It also creates issues with Luddite citizenry such as the Amish, who on matters of religion do not use certain technologies, including cell phones and the internet, so an alternate way of re-deligation would need to be established for them (perhaps a service that will hold their votes in a way that can be trusted to vote in their interests).

When canvassers like Darley - Emerson get a list of names, it has been edited according to the one criterion that matters: how likely her visit is to generate a new vote towards the president's re-election — whether the canvasser remembers to ask who the voter is supporting or not.

They know who the best canddiate is, and they're going to vote for her, no matter how inept this Ryan guy is.

Probably because the parliamentary Labour party, which overwhelmingly backs Smith, still clings onto the illusion that no matter how obnoxiously the party behaves towards its core supporters, it is still entitled to millions of votes from poor voters who have no alternative.

Bluntly, your hope is that an issue that matters to you and to many educated middle - class people (but not to most Labour voters, who may well regard the idea in the same way as many Conservatives, as a way to give unfair influence to Liberal Democrats), electoral reform, is important enough to form an electoral alliance over, despite the fact this would leave many party members unable to vote (and who would get to stand in say Durham or Redcar anyway?).

Clearly though he is well wide of the mark if he believes that these are people who will vote for Obama «no matter what».

The question for anyone thinking of voting for UKIP is this: while a vote next June for UKIP is a wasted vote merely playing into the hands of those who seek a Federal Europe, a vote for the Conservatives registers the momentum required to elect a Conservative government within a matter of months.

As I have argued elsewhere, as a matter of electoral strategy, the Labour Party must signal to the millions of traditional Labour voters who vote to leave the EU in June that, after the referendum, there is still a place for them in the Labour Party.

Why would the outcome of a state senate race in NY matter one whit to a voter in Maryland or Minnesota who is voting directly on the issue of marriage.