The government presented its much anticipated plans to solve the West Lothian Question, or more simply, why Scottish MPs have long been able to
vote on legislation only affecting England (or England and Wales) while English MPs are unable to vote on measures devolved to Scotland.
Not exact matches
What's more, to get
legislation through Congress relying
only on Republican
votes, the majority must rely
on reconciliation instructions contained in a budget resolution.
If the electorate
vote to repeal the Eighth Amendment, any draft
legislation would
only become law if the Dail
voted for it, and that is not a foregone conclusion given the Fine Gael coalition is a minority administration and TDs will
vote on conscience.
Parliament
only votes on the implementing
legislation, not
on the whole text of the agreement.
Under the government's proposals, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh MPs would no longer be allowed to
vote on legislation that
only affects England.
There is significant support for the principle of EVEL: the 2014 Future of England Survey found that 62 % of people in England agreed that Scottish MPs should be prevented from
voting on England -
only legislation.
An anti-devolutionist, Dalyell argued it would be unfair for Scottish MPs to have equal rights to
vote on English -
only legislation.
«Today, the state Assembly is poised to debate and
vote on legislation (A. 6777) that
only gets half the job done when it comes to ensuring parents are informed of their rights and protected if they choose to opt their children in grades 3 - 8 out of the controversial Common Core standardized tests.»
It is much less than what George Cunningham insisted
on in the Scottish devolution proposals that led to the 1979
legislation on that; he insisted
on having 40 % for a yes
vote, whereas I am calling here for
only 40 % of the electorate.
A government could still pass England -
only legislation on the back of the
votes of Scottish MPs in exceptional circumstances, but
only if they believed it was in the wider interests of the UK as a whole.
In an article for the Western Mail this morning, Mr Hain warned the Tories» English
votes plan, where
only English MPs would be able to
vote on Westminster
legislation affecting England, was playing into the hands of separatists.
Indeed, when Danny Alexander, Chris Huhne, David Laws and I met Adonis and the rest of the Labour team, they wouldn't even commit to supporting
legislation on alternative
voting, despite Labour being the
only party that had such a proposal in its manifesto.
Staten Island Congressman Dan Donovan — the
only Republican representing any part of New York City in Washington, D.C. —
voted «no»
on the
legislation as well, said that Obamacare is «failing and requires major reform» and that he will work
on a replacement.
Does the Deputy Leader of the House share my aspiration that by the end of this Parliament we will ensure that English -
only legislation is
voted on with a majority of English MPs?»
The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could
only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which
legislation was still reliant
on Liberal and Conservative
votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of
votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats,
on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark
on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would
only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
As such, the formation of a coalition government
on English -
only legislation was a consequence of the ability of Scottish MPs to
vote on English matters but English MPs unable to
vote on Scottish matters.
There is also the issue of whether MPs with seats in Scotland, Northern Ireland or Wales should continue to be allowed to
vote on legislation that will
only affect people in England.
A short while later, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D - N.Y.) said the House «is drenched in blood and the
only way we can cleanse it is if the speaker of the House allows us to
vote on this
legislation.
Smaller states can end up feeling that the UK
only calls when it wants something, such as a signature
on a letter before a summit or a
vote on legislation affecting the UK financial services — and the call often comes at the very last minute.
The House approved the
legislation Wednesday
on a 359 - 64
vote, with
only Republicans opposing.
Similarly, the result of the referendum
on an alternative
voting system in 2011 required no change, but had it been otherwise, it was beyond doubt that change could have been achieved
only by
legislation passed by Parliament.
That includes Corker, who was the
only Republican senator to
vote «no»
on earlier Senate
legislation.