Sentences with phrase «vote winner by»

Amedore was declared a 37 - vote winner by an acting state Supreme Court judge in December.

Live From Jodrell Bank was voted the winner by a panel of industry judges for it's extra activity of intergrating science into the event, and picked out of every single idea at of UK events, for activity outside of music and entertainment.

Live From Jodrell Bank was voted the winner by a panel of industry judges for it's extra activity of inter...

Not exact matches

How Each Works Sweepstakes winners are selected randomly through a drawing while contest winners are selected by an official evaluation process such as audience voting or requiring participants to meet a set of quantifiable criteria.

OTTAWA — Nine million votes were wasted in the 2015 election under Canada's winner - take - all electoral system — that's more than the populations of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces combined, according to a new electoral reform primer outlining why the principle of proportionality must underpin the government's promise to bring in voting reform by the next federal election.

Two winners will be selected: one by our panel of investors and the other by audience vote.

Still, the biggest winner appears to be Hezbollah and its allies, who look set to scoop up at least some of the seats lost by Hariri's coalition, largely because of the expected fragmentation of the Sunni vote.

One restaurant will be deemed Chicago's Best Summer WingFest winner by popular vote, via text, and the winner will receive $ 1000 cash.

So, I resorted to the net and came up with this winner — voted the Dorset National Dish in 2006 by Greg Coomer.

Entries can be voted on by «Liking» them and at the end of the party (each party will last 1 week) we will all announce the «winners» the same day as the NEXT linky party begins.

The cranberry bars and rice pudding were insanely delicious, the mussels and fries we had the night for dinner before declared a «winner» by all and the popcorn cookies we talked about voted «best cookie EVER by all my neighborhood tasters.

As the first year that Ireland has been considered separately in our awards, the editorial panel at Whisky Magazine was overwhelmed by the interest and response to voting and nominating the winners.

The winner is determined by vote from a committee made up of members of the Brewers Association advisory board.

Finalists and winners are based on a weighted vote of industry experts, scientists and nutritionists, as well as by cumulative votes of registered Engredea and Nutracon attendees.

After the first round of voting by judges, committee members, and previous winners, the semifinalists, which will be announced on Thursday, February 15, are then narrowed down to a final list of nominees.

The kids chosen have recorded cooking videos which are being voted on by the public on the LOUKOUMI facebook page and the winner will get the chance to cook their favorite childhood recipe with celebrity chef CAT CORA.

The top 10 with the most votes will move on the final round where three winners will be determined by a panel of celebrity judges.

Hosts Nina Radetich, Dayna Roselli and Robin Leach led the awards ceremony and industry notables announced the winners in each category as determined by more than 13,000 votes cast by the public.

With the nominees now having been announced for the 2014 Golden Boy award, voted on by journalists and handed to the best player under 21 in Europe, we decided to take a look back through the history of it and the 11 players who have been voted as the winner in its short history.

The voting process works by the coach and captain, as well as one journalist, from each of the nations affiliated with FIFA casting a top three, with these votes then extrapolated to find the overall winner and final shortlist of three.

The Golden Boy award is one of the most prestigious accolades that can be bestowed on a young player — voted for by journalists, it picks out the finest player Under 21 in Europe, with past winners including Paul Pogba, Wayne Rooney, Sergio Aguero and Lionel Messi.

The ultimate winner will also be decided by public vote and when it's open, we'll be sure to let you know.

The winner will be decided by a combination of votes from the public, a panel made up of former footballers and managers, while the captain of each Premier League club will also have one vote each.

Votes from the three parties will be combined to decide the winner which will be announced by the Premier League.

This means that journalists in the sports magazine along with the coaches of national teams of the nations involved and the captains of each of the clubs evaluated will be responsible for choosing the winner by vote.

In a similar way, a shortlist will be made for the Barclays Manager of the Month and the winner will be decided by a combination of votes from the panel and the public vote.

Votes from the three parties will be combined to decide the winner which will be announced by the Premier League soon after.

The Player of the Year prize, won last season by Eden Hazard, is now in its 50th year, so register your vote now and choose which member of the current squad joins the illustrious list of past winners.

SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. (March 15, 2018)-- BabyCenter ®, the # 1 pregnancy and parenting digital resource, today announced the winners of its fifth annual Moms» Picks awards, given to the gear and products voted best by parents.

The top 10 finalists will be posted online and voted on by consumers to choose the grand prize winner.

(Semi-finalists» recipes will also be posted for online voting by the public to determine a Popular Choice Winner.)

Winners were chosen by parents who voted for their favourite products, brands and businesses from a shortlist compiled by the organisers, in a rigorous testing process.

There are two Moms» Picks awards: finalists, which are determined by a jury panel composed of BabyCenter Mom and Dad Influencers and BabyCenter Community members; and winners, which are determined by online voting open to all.

Do all the votes in a precinct go to the majority candidate (eg winner take all) and then the tallies added up by precinct?

Even so, some systems (such as winner - take - all) are more heavily impacted by tactical voting than others (such as instant - runoff).

While the exact rules vary from state to state, essentially a voter is voting for a set of electors chosen by the party, and the most votes for a given party / candidate selects that set of electors, so where there is winner takes all, the set of electors is equal to the total number of electors for that state

Almost all states follow a «winner - takes - all» policy: if a candidate gets a plurality of the vote in that state, then the group of electors chosen by that candidate's party are the ones who vote.

Additionally, it throws away excess votes received by the winner.

According to them, by nullifying elections in 18 out of 31 local government areas, Section 179 (2)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution, which required that a candidate vying for the office of the Governor would be declared winner if he has not less than one quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two - thirds of the local government areas, has been breached.

We also have mandatory voting, so that the winner isn't decided by «who can get more people to vote», nor by voter suppression techniques.

So such a result might put the Head of State in a difficult position — would she go with the seat split spat out by the first past the post system, or break with established practice and ask the popular vote winner?

Recent stark examples of the absurdity in a «winner - takes - all» system occurred in Florida and New Mexico during the 2000 presidential election when candidate George W. Bush won both states by a fraction of a percentage point, but gained the total number of each state's electoral votes.

Maine and Nebraska allocate by congressional district, plus the winner gets the other two votes.

By urging tribunals to strike down the use of the card reader, the implication is a return to our prior election system, going back to the 2003 and 2007 era where Mike Tyson, dead people and ghost names on the voter register produced huge votes recorded on election day to declare people winners of election.

By successful, I mean undermined the public trust of the results sufficiently so the winner could not successfully claim a mandate, take leadership, pass the law - whatever the vote was about.

By contrast, the unit rule (by which states award all their electoral votes to the plurality winner in the state) that 48 states employ under the electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 196By contrast, the unit rule (by which states award all their electoral votes to the plurality winner in the state) that 48 states employ under the electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 196by which states award all their electoral votes to the plurality winner in the state) that 48 states employ under the electoral college encourages third parties, especially regional candidates like Strom Thurmond in 1948 or George Wallace in 1968.

A 51 - 49 % split would have the winner win by 250 votes, which is more than the 239 known cases of fraud.

After millions of dollars of spending on his behalf, much of it by the charter school crowd, Carl Marcellino was finally declared the winner of his race by about 1500 votes against a woefully underfunded opponent.

Tuesday's election winners will likely be determined by which party did a better job of getting out the vote.

This means that if there are more than two candidates running, a third party candidate can «spoil» the vote for the viable candidate most similar in ideology to him by splitting the vote of people who share their ideology, making the winner the candidate whose ideology actually has less support in the electorate than an alternative.