Take it from a person that
voted Labour out last G election!
Had they been so outraged at this coup, they could have
voted Labour out in 2005
Not exact matches
«Watch
out for Remain -
voting areas swinging towards
Labour and Leave -
voting areas swinging towards the Tories, much as happened last year,» said Curtice, professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde.
Even if
Labour gave a free
vote, which is unlikely, the pressure from
Labour constituency activists (not
Labour voters) would force most
Labour MPs to
vote for the change: just a few people of principle will hold
out.
She spoke after
Labour, Tory and Green MSPs on Holyrood's Social Security Committee united in June to
vote through a series of amendments to the Scottish Government's Child Poverty Bill - including one by Green MSP Alison Johnstone requiring ministers to set
out whether they will use new welfare powers to increase child benefit.
Colin Rallings and Mike Thrasher of Plymouth University point
out that just 21.6 % of the electorate
voted Labour in 2005.
I do not trust any party at the moment,
Labour Tory Liberals, all are after the
votes and the fact have gone
out the window.
She challenged analysis that talked up
Labour success at the election pointing
out that the Conservatives piled on voters in many northern seats that had
voted Leave, among older voters and among the working class.
How to campaign enough to ensure
Labour supporters get
out and
vote without looking to be in partnership with those who seem to regard these very supporters with contempt?
That effectively rules the investigation
out, given
Labour has already made clear it will
vote it down wherever possible in its bid to have a judge - led inquiry.
Those
Labour people advocating primaries turn
out to be the same people, on the
Labour side, supporting the
Vote for a Change campaign - except for Neal Lawson and John Harris.
All progressives with any common sense will get
out and
vote Labour, recognizing
Labour is clearly the party of progress.
It comes a year after Burnham took just 19 per cent of the
votes in the battle for the
Labour leadership — having started
out as the clear favourite to replace Ed Miliband.
And now brown and Mandy run back to new
labour to try and get the middle class to
vote for it, new
labour is nothing more then a Thatcherite party, and she lost and a Pray New
labour is kicked
out of power even if it means it never agains takes power
«Today I am setting
out a positive agenda for
Labour voters - reasons why
Labour voters should
vote Remain and the patriotic case for remaining in Europe.
And the
Labour Party, which had opposed the referendum during the election campaign, has now come
out in support of the
vote.
With so much of the 2015 UKIP
vote now embedded in the Tory Coalition, and with
Labour now more officially a party of soft Brexit, it is very difficult to see how the next election will play
out.
The
voting evidence suggests it is the logical one although I guess electoral reform will be the stumbling block - http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/mpsee.php Still, it would give
Labour the chance to demonstrate that the Lib Dems are essentially a party of the centre - right in a way that we are not, to renew our policies, and to reach
out to those genuinely progressive MPs who have, by some mischance, ended up in the Lib Dems.
In her speech, she singled
out Labour and the Liberal Democrats, as well as the House of Lords: «In recent weeks
Labour have threatened to
vote against the final agreement we reach with the EU.
The
Labour Party
voted in favour of quitting the EU, but seven
out of ten Brits
voted to stay in in a referendum.
It's possible the EU referendum has helped demonstrate that democratic
votes can genuinely change things, and that Corbyn's
Labour seems different enough that it's worth going
out and supporting.
However, polling from the Mile End Institute at Queen Mary Institute, conducted in December, shows that eight
out of ten
Labour members either agree or strongly agree with having a second
vote.
This approach presents a problem for the
Labour leadership who have pursued a policy of «constructive ambiguity» in order to balance affluent middle class remainers with huge swathes of the electorate in its northern heartlands who
voted to come
out.
For sure, we don't know if the Ukip - mania will last for another two years; and if it does quite how that will play
out in relation to the Tory /
Labour / Lib Dem
votes.
But until the SNP rule
out abstaining on such a
vote, Scottish
Labour do seem to be entitled to make their argument.
The 2010
Labour voters who
voted Yes and now intend to
vote SNP are noticeably different from other 2010
Labour voters in their responses to a variety of BES questions, but they particularly stand
out in two principle respects.
Tom Watson, the shadow culture secretary and deputy
Labour leader, has put
out a statement following the
vote against a Leveson two inquiry accusing the government a «shameless capitulation to press barons».
Although Birmingham itself
voted in favour of
Labour's Sion Simon, the result was closer than you would expect for a city that currently sends only one Tory
out of ten MPs to Parliament.
While early predictions that
Labour could take Wandsworth proved over-optimistic,
Labour sources pointed
out that a few hundred
votes in several swing wards could have clinched it.
As Anthony Wells points
out, it is somewhat inevitable that
Labour should be doing worse where they started stronger because there are some places where they didn't have 15 points to lose, but it might also be partly because Ashcroft only polled in
Labour seats where the Yes
vote was relatively strong in the independence referendum.
Turkey's don't
vote fr Christmas so why would
Labour MPs
vote for a system which would wipe
out many of them and permanently force them into a coalition if they want to hold power?
And yet, the
Labour Party in the past has successfully gone
out to the British countryside to court the rural
vote and build the foundations of support.
Because
Labour could, potentially, win if the previously
Labour but now non-voters can be persuaded to start turning
out and
voting Labour again, but only if the non-
voting support base is fairly large, and without that sort of analysis over larger areas it's hard to judge — it's definitely partially true in my ward,
Labour had disappeared electorally years ago, but won the seat in 2012, despite most other parties getting similar
votes to normal (and our support mostly going to an Independent we were tacitly backing).
And the Lib Dems would be
out of their minds to go into coalition before the election — «
vote Lib Dem, get
Labour» did for them in 1992, and it wasn't even true then.
Labour's Angela Eagle described the plan as a cynical attempt by a government with an overall majority of just 12 to use procedural trickery to manufacture a very much larger one by knocking the SNP
out of select
votes.
In particular Cameron will say that «if you want
Labour out, you need to both
vote Tory and
vote «no» in the referendum.
Remember that only a few months ago Ed Balls said
Labour voters were justified in tactically
voting for Libdems in areas where
Labour was uncompetitive to keep the Tories
out.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who allowed
Labour MPs a free
vote amid deep divisions in his party, warned against an «ill - thought -
out rush to war».
Out of 229
Labour MPs, there were 172 who
voted against him, 40 who backed him and four spoilt ballot papers.
The Leave
vote gives
Labour the opportunity to look forward, set
out positive vision for the country, think creatively about our future, and excite people, including its withering working - class base.
In the London election, roughly equal numbers of those
voting for other candidates turned
out to have a
Labour or Tory preference - so those 250,000 voters got to count in the final outcome - though the result was unaffected by transfers.
Labour MPs shouted «shame» as Hague indicated his approval for the
vote to go ahead - and applauded and cheered as the result of the division was read
out.
The research forecast that the SNP would get 53 seats, which together with
Labour's 268 would leave the two parties just short of the 323
votes needed to lock -
out a Conservative government.
The other big news in the last seven days is that the
Labour Party have now officially come
out against the possibility of a formal coalition with the SNP, in part to reduce their vulnerability to the Conservatives adopting a «
Vote Ed, get Alex» strategy.
While the inquiry could not rule
out a modest late swing towards the Conservatives, initial claims that the polling errors were due to «shy Tories» (respondents who deliberately misreported their intentions) or «lazy
Labour» (
Labour voters who said they'd
vote but ultimately didn't) did not stand up to scrutiny.
But unless Conservative MPs turned
out en masse to
vote against the Party's right - an unlikely course of action, given the»22 Executive results - Liberal and
Labour support for less spiky candidates provides the only comprehensible explanation of the results.
The Norwich South MP said
Labour MPs should reach
out to colleagues in other parties on issues like
voting reform.
«There was a sort of hidden army of people who were so worried about
Labour that they literally came
out to
vote for the first time.»
I might have to consider
voting labour for the first time in my life if it might keep you guys
out.
Only 32 MPs need to
vote against the government to wipe
out its majority of 63, but canvassing carried
out by the leftwing organisation Compass indicates that more than 100
Labour MPs will send a warning to ministers when they sign an early day motion opposing the move to part - privatise the Post Office when parliament returns on 12 January.