Sentences with phrase «voted for that candidate as»

Yes, but you will give a negative vote by voting for your candidate as well while even further advancing him.

If a Democrat who won by 300 votes received 400 votes on the Working Families line, it's reasonable to assume a sizable number of those 400 voters would have simply voted for that candidate as a Democrat had they not had the WFP line.

Not exact matches

Black voters in red states should vote as they usually do for candidates, down the ballot — and leave their choice for President blank.

An unusual 16 seats were available in this year's vote, with branch members choosing from as many as four candidates for those seats.

Overall, the campaign organization's website struck Linda Pophal of Strageic Communications, LLC, as «a recruitment tool,» for paid staff, as opposed to something to encourage people to vote for the candidate.

Gary Johnson won only 1 % of the vote when he ran as the Libertarian candidate for president in 2012.

If, for any reason, any of the nominees is not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the board of directors.

Donald Trump's behavior makes him unacceptable as a candidate for president, and I won't vote for him.

In all liklihood I can't see the NDP winning so may as well vote for the candidate you like the most in your riding.

Harvey went on to use other candidates ages and health conditions as to why he was a better person to vote for such as one candidate being 65 and being diabetic.

Popular Wood Buffalo mayor Melissa Blake, who is seeking re-election in this year's municipal vote, would be seen as a star candidate for any party and could easily fill a top cabinet position if elected into government.

As part of the campaign, Boston Market asks you to vote for the candidate you prefer, after which you're rewarded with a coupon to redeem for money off the new dishes.

Pop superstar Jennifer Lopez was joined by Hillary Clinton at a free concert in Miami Saturday night, where the Democratic presidential candidate urged supporters to head to the polls for early voting as her campaign was rocked by a renewed FBI probe of her emails the previous day.

In other words, shareholders would follow a common procedure to vote «for» or «against» a candidate, and only those candidates who receive majority support would serve as directors.

The people who are furious about the closure of the Edmonton City Centre Airport or annoyed about the funding of the Art Gallery of Alberta are unlikely to vote for the same candidate as the people angry over the Capital Power - Epcor decision.

Once again, all the conservative votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority» rules the country and will be doing so for awhile.

Jesus sees no virtue in Clinton supporters dismissing swaths of people as racists and misogynists because they plan to vote for a candidate who displays some of those qualities.

He takes as his point of departure some polling data that suggests a durable unwillingness to vote for a Mormon presidential candidate, a reluctance that has....

If I fought against the right of atheists to campaign for atheist candidates, then why should I expect anything less than a counterattack against my own voting rights as a Christian?

If by chance a candidate arises that has more experience and talent at balancing budgets and cutting spending, I'll vote for him, but as there's not... GO MITT!!

For starters, it has given me a very important inside & background story as to make up my mind as to who to vote for, if Mitt Romney will become a candidate, in the next general electioFor starters, it has given me a very important inside & background story as to make up my mind as to who to vote for, if Mitt Romney will become a candidate, in the next general electiofor, if Mitt Romney will become a candidate, in the next general elections.

We as citizens of United States of America have a right to vote for the candidate we choose.

This extremely narrow reading of the law basically said «so what if he used the course to recruit, organize and groom candidates; as long as they didn't say «Vote for Jones», it wasn't partisan.»

Once again, all the conservative votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Mitt Romney, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority» rules the country and will be doing so for awhile.

There were no other colors or flavors to vote for which means that this story is about as senseless as having Iowa as the first in the nation to choose candidates.

Thus, by your logic, you should have no problem with Muslims making up 80 - 90 % of your country's population, voting primarily for Muslim candidates, and constantly striving to make their belief system the law of the land - as is the case with Christians in the United States.

You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your vote matters is by voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?

Once again, all the conservative votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Newton Leroy Gingrich, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority» rules the country and will be doing so for awhile.

Pro-lifers would never vote for a pro-choice candidate because it is viewed as a fundamental character flaw.

There are enough people in this country who will blindly vote for whichever candidate comes off as the most devout that it makes it worth their while to court that block.

For those unfamiliar with Westminster systems, most parliamentary votes are, as the British say, subject to the party whip: that is, members are expected to vote with the party leadership and are subject to severe retribution (such as being «de-certified» as a party - supported candidate at the next election) if they resist the whip.

As much as I'd LOVE to see a non-believer as president... i'd jump out a window before it was a socialist, obama - type, redistribution - for - votes candidatAs much as I'd LOVE to see a non-believer as president... i'd jump out a window before it was a socialist, obama - type, redistribution - for - votes candidatas I'd LOVE to see a non-believer as president... i'd jump out a window before it was a socialist, obama - type, redistribution - for - votes candidatas president... i'd jump out a window before it was a socialist, obama - type, redistribution - for - votes candidate.

As a result, we should allow for a range of opinions, affirming our areas of agreement (e.g., that a vote is a gift to be stewarded) and recognizing Christian liberty in areas of disagreement (How should we weigh the personal conduct of one candidate against that of another?

Here's a novel thought, Tal Luken: Why not vote for the candidate who is best for the country as a whole, not just the one that adheres to your own narrow belief?

I don't know what church you've been going to, but my minister goes to great pains before an election to not mention ANY candidate or particular ballot issue, but instead call on the congregation to read their scriptures (suggesting some references) and pray, pray, pray for God's guidance, as they get ready to cast their vote.

Rejecting the recommendation of a task - force study that such ordination be allowed, the assembly voted instead that only repentant homosexuals who choose celibacy or seek a reorientation of their sexual desires should be considered as qualified candidates for ministry.

As I got closer to the booths, I took a moment to consider the candidate I was voting for.

Once again, all the conservative votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Mitt Romney, Newton Leroy Gingrich, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum (exit right), in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority» rules the country and will be doing so for awhile.

hotair will not be voting for any American candidate as he is a butt in canadian.

By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.

As in New York, a proposal for a local Islamic center has become a state - wide campaign issue in recent weeks in Tennessee, where certain Republican candidates in various primaries are trying to outdo each other for the fear vote by denouncing a recently approved expansion of an existing Islamic center in Murfreesboro.

I used to be a repub till congress was taken over by the tea party and Romney as our candidate.I can not support a man who is a draft dodger and a tax evader.The repub congress has done nothing for vets, nothing for the middleclass.All of the good repubs have gone or have been forced out by the extremists that care nothing for the average joe or veterans like myself.Until we get real candidates that care for the middleclass and vets I will not vote for the repubs.Honor and respect, and caring for this nation is what the repubs used to stand for, now we have wackjobs from the tea party holding america hostage and thats as un patriotic as it gets, it is hurting many americans, our economy and soldiers who are looking for work.

They are often crudely portrayed as voting based solely on identity politics, born suckers for quotes from Scripture or «code words» laced in the speeches of candidates appealing to their spiritual beliefs.

As a wave of disappointed voters announced on Twitter that Trump's election has led them to drop the label evangelical, den Dulk speculated that evangelical believers who voted for Clinton may have been less likely to identify that way in exit polls, widening the born - again gap between the two candidates.

There is a story out of Iowa - a story about a faith community that has matured beyond voting for the «most evangelical» candidate as a «statement» and takes seriously the responsibility of electing someone to occupy the Oval Office at a time of great national testing.

It implies that there is no rational basis for voting for either candidate — that voting for one or the other is just the effect of how you have been (passively) formed by your environment — that there is no such thing as individual deliberation or political persuasion, just epistemic and behavioral determinism.

As surveys indicate, many voters will go to the polls, not to vote for a candidate, but to vote against a candidate.

Yes we indeed supports Republican candidate for this reason until now, that the Tea Party (haters of President Obama) came in, with some look warm Christian joined, they were so strong, they voted out the person as a true Christian that I thought would be the next Christian Presidential Candidate for Recandidate for this reason until now, that the Tea Party (haters of President Obama) came in, with some look warm Christian joined, they were so strong, they voted out the person as a true Christian that I thought would be the next Christian Presidential Candidate for ReCandidate for Republican.

Here are some details about that November 2004 ballot proposal: 1) there was already in place a Utah law strictly banning same - sex marriage, which I fully supported; 2) all three candidates for the office of attorney general of Utah (the chief law - enforcement officer in the state) opposed the amendment, including the LDS (Mormon) Republican incumbent, Mark Shurtleff, mostly because they considered it a poorly drafted amendment; 3) I refused to endorse the amendment, but I did not urge people to vote «no»; 4) the leadership of the LDS Church, which has a record for being as strongly opposed to same - sex marriage as the Catholic Church, did not issue a statement urging its members to vote one way or the other; 5) inasmuch as two thirds of Utahans belong to the LDS Church, this means that the leadership of at least 80 percent of Utah churchgoers did not urge a «yes» vote on the amendment.

It's simple as this, Rick Santorum appeals to the less educated, extremely conservative and more bigot minded segment of rural America, which is largely dominated by Born again evangelicals, who as the article points out have a misguided view that that Mormons aren't Christian, and in their misguided bigotry seem to be voting against Romney based upon their religion rather than for a good candidate who can win the general election.