Sentences with phrase «voter behavior in»

London - based Cambridge Analytica has been accused of using Facebook data to influence voter behavior in U.S. elections.

Cambridge Analytica, a London - based political consulting firm, has been accused of using ill - gotten Facebook data to influence voter behavior in the 2016 election.

Not exact matches

In democracies, political «leaders» rarely lead, but follow voters» behavior — not voters» wishes or desires, but behavior.

The only goal that matters is to get your messages in front of highly influential people (think digital multipliers and megaphones) who are tightly connected to significant (and fairly sizeable) niches of active and desirable individuals whose actions and attitudes they can directly influence (amplification) and whose behaviors as consumers, voters, or other cohort members you are looking to change and channel into actual results.

Cambridge Analytica, which rose to prominence through its work with Mr. Trump's 2016 election campaign, has found itself confronting a deepening crisis since reports this past weekend in The New York Times and The Observer of London that the firm had harvested the data from more than 50 million Facebook profiles in its bid to develop techniques for predicting the behavior of individual American voters.

The calls for greater scrutiny followed reports on Saturday in The New York Times and The Observer of London that Cambridge Analytica, a political data firm founded by Stephen K. Bannon and Robert Mercer, the wealthy Republican donor, had used the Facebook data to develop methods that it claimed could identify the personalities of individual American voters and influence their behavior.

They think voters are fed up with the chaos in the White House and Trump's behavior, and that will matter more when voters enter the polls than the level of the stock market or how many jobs there are.

CNN: My Take: Catholic bishops» election behavior threatens their authority Vincent Miller, Gudorf Chair of Catholic Theology and Culture at the University of Dayton., argues that «By putting voters in a «with us or against us» bind, some of America's bishops have risked eroding their own authority.»

With the «swamp of criminality and unethical behavior in Albany» and «voter disgust» at unprecedented heights, the time for reform is now, before the end of the legislative session on June 20th.

With a «chief scientist» specializing in consumer behavior, an «analytics department» monitoring voter trends, and a squad of dozens huddled at computer screens editing video or writing code, the sprawling office complex inside One Prudential Plaza looks like a corporate research and development lab — Ping - Pong table and all.

But psychographics, in theory, go deeper, claiming to be able to predict a voter's personality traits, such as how organized, extroverted, or quick to worry they are, by looking at a person's online and consumer behavior.

I don't think we see all that much from either of these men that would put them in a position where they would have earned a second chance to redeem themselves from their selfish behavior and deserve a second chance by New York voters.»

If Silver is still in his post come fall or still in office come next election period it would represent that democratic leaders and voters are lacking what it takes to model behavior, set the example and appreciate the basic public need to suffer consequences for wrong behavior.

Cambridge Analytica, which rose to prominence through its work with Mr. Trump's 2016 election campaign, has found itself confronting a deepening crisis since reports this past weekend in The New York Times and The Observer of London that the firm had harvested the data from more than 50 million Facebook profiles in its bid to develop techniques for predicting the behavior of individual American voters.

The Reform Party of New York State represents the interests of voters who are concerned with out - of - control spending, growing budget deficits, an unsustainable national debt, as well as gross mismanagement in government and unethical behavior from elected representatives.

Weeks of provocative and outlandish behavior have hurt presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's standing in two new national polls of registered voters, which showed him falling further behind Clinton.

The contacts took place as Cambridge Analytica was building a roster of Republican clients in the United States — and harvesting the Facebook profiles of over 50 million users to develop tools to analyze voters» behavior.

Slightly more than six in ten voters — 61 percent — said they believe Weiner's behavior was unethical but not illegal, while 13 percent disagree and another 13 percent insist he did nothing wrong whatsoever.

Cambridge Analytica — funded by the right - wing billionaire Mercer family and advised by then — Breitbart editor - in - chief Steve Bannon — hoped to use the data to target political advertising and influence voter behavior.

Given all this curious behavior, the voters in Clarkstown should take a long, hard look at Councilwoman Lasker's track record before blindly voting on row A in November.

«This allows an easy way to model an «open system» in which few actors (the parties) interact with many (the voters), and we can show how voters direct the behavior of the various parties.»

Apicella noted she and her colleagues found when voters were given $ 5 that they could donate in toto or in part to political parties or keep for themselves, after the 2008 election, voters for losing candidates whose testosterone levels dropped donated less, «showing this withdrawal behavior.»

Following this largely unexpected result, some explanations pointed to the role of a voter's age, gender or education in their voting behavior while others wondered whether the «Leave campaign» might have mobilized xenophobic attitudes by emphasizing a fear of foreigners.

The change in party preference may be attributed to a psychological behavior, where voters may be more averse to risk during poor weather conditions.

John Antonakis and Olaf Dalgas hypothesized that because «naïve» ratings based solely on facial appearance correlate with actual voter behavior, voters and children might have a lot in common.

And unlike most studies of voter behavior, which «only diagnose problems in democratic competence,» Healy and Lenz have found a cure, Berinsky says.

And given the uncertainty in our estimates — a concept most Americans now understand thanks to last week's election results — we can not rule out the possibility that private schools have a modest impact (positive or negative) on voter behavior.

In an early study of the sentencing behavior of Pennsylvania judges, who run in retention elections after being elected to office, Huber and Gordon (2004) found that criminal sentences are significantly longer the closer the judge is to facing the voterIn an early study of the sentencing behavior of Pennsylvania judges, who run in retention elections after being elected to office, Huber and Gordon (2004) found that criminal sentences are significantly longer the closer the judge is to facing the voterin retention elections after being elected to office, Huber and Gordon (2004) found that criminal sentences are significantly longer the closer the judge is to facing the voters.

The improvements included using larger fonts, lists, headers, white space, simple language, and logical organization.29 In a study of voter behavior, Reilly and Richey found that increasing language complexity on ballots made voters more likely to skip ballot questions.30 Rogers and Brown found that subjects who received «high - impact» instructions complied with those instructions at a significantly higher rate than the group that received instructions in the «low - impact» style.31 Finally, McGlone and Tofighbakhsh found that readers presented with two phrases with identical meaning more readily accepted and believed the version of the phrase that rhymeIn a study of voter behavior, Reilly and Richey found that increasing language complexity on ballots made voters more likely to skip ballot questions.30 Rogers and Brown found that subjects who received «high - impact» instructions complied with those instructions at a significantly higher rate than the group that received instructions in the «low - impact» style.31 Finally, McGlone and Tofighbakhsh found that readers presented with two phrases with identical meaning more readily accepted and believed the version of the phrase that rhymein the «low - impact» style.31 Finally, McGlone and Tofighbakhsh found that readers presented with two phrases with identical meaning more readily accepted and believed the version of the phrase that rhymed.

Cook County is suing Facebook and Cambridge Analytica for allegedly violating an Illinois fraud law after reports that the political consulting firm used ill - gotten Facebook data in an effort to influence voter behavior.

Now, concerns about sharing every aspect of life on social media are coming to a head amid reports that a political consulting firm hired by President Donald Trump's campaign allegedly used ill - gotten Facebook data in an effort to influence voter behavior.

Facebook has been under fire since the 2016 general election for spreading fake news that was designed to influence voter behavior, particularly in certain key states.

Mr. Wylie was interested in using inherent psychological traits to affect voters» behavior and had assembled a team of psychologists and data scientists, some of them affiliated with Cambridge University.

The emphasis on psychology differentiates it from traditional data firms that specialize in «microtargeting,» which tracks consumer data and behavior to target voters; their method was was, wrote Bloomberg's Sasha Issenberg, «the most audacious new analytical innovation foisted on American politics this year.»

The contacts took place as Cambridge Analytica was building a roster of Republican clients in the United States — and harvesting the Facebook profiles of over 50 million users to develop tools to analyze voters» behavior.

Cambridge Analytica, which rose to prominence through its work with Mr. Trump's 2016 election campaign, has found itself confronting a deepening crisis since reports this past weekend in The New York Times and The Observer of London that the firm had harvested the data from more than 50 million Facebook profiles in its bid to develop techniques for predicting the behavior of individual American voters.

His «super PAC» was one of the earliest customers of Cambridge Analytica, which has found itself confronting a deepening crisis after reports last weekend that the firm had harvested the data from more than 50 million Facebook profiles in its bid to develop techniques for predicting the behavior of individual American voters.

The objective was to assess the underlying motivation of voters and identify how open a particular constituency was to accepting a change in vote - buying behavior.

According to the account of one Christopher Wylie, a former employee of Cambridge Analytica, the company used the improperly obtained information to build a software tool for predicting voter behavior and influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election in the U.S..

Not all or any of that data has been eliminated as it later ended up being used to influence voter behavior during the 2016 presidential election in the U.S., according to recent media reports.

According to the informant, the company used it to build a model predicting voter's behavior during US Presidential election in order to influence it.

In fact, the wealthy Republican donor wooed his political adviser Stephen K. Bannon, with the promise of tools that could identify the personalities of American voters and influence their behavior.

One way to target voters, in particular, is relevant to Cambridge Analytica: collecting information to predict people's personality and psychology — known as psychographics — and then using that information to try to influence behavior.