Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said on June 30, 2017, that New York State would not comply with the request for
voter data by the voter integrity commission created by President Donald Trump to examine what he said were millions of fraudulent voters in the 2016 election.
Not exact matches
The app cut ties with Cambridge Analytica in Mexico after the British company was accused
by a whistleblower of improperly accessing
data to target US and British
voters in recent elections.
As of November 7, more Republican - affiliated Pennsylvania
voters had cast early ballots than Democratic
voters, according to TargetSmart
voter file
data obtained by the NBC News Data Analytics
data obtained
by the NBC News
Data Analytics
Data Analytics Lab.
Sandberg's post came less than a week after The New York Times and The Observer of London reported that Cambridge Analytica, a political
data company created
by Stephen Bannon and Robert Mercer, gathered users» Facebook
data and claimed it could influence the behavior of American
voters.
Cook's and Musk's comments follow The New York Times and The Observer of London's report that Cambridge Analytica, a political
data company launched
by Stephen Bannon and Robert Mercer, collected users» Facebook
data and claimed it could influence the behavior of American
voters.
Cambridge Analytica promised a
data service that was enhanced
by its «psychographic»
voter profiles.
Deep Root Analytics, a conservative
data firm contracted
by the RNC as part of a push to ramp up its
voter - analytics operation in the wake of Mitt Romney's defeat in the 2012 presidential election, stored details of about 61 % of the US population on an Amazon cloud server without password protection for those two weeks.
Deep Root emphasized in its statement that the
data that was accessed «was, to the best of our knowledge, proprietary information as well as
voter data that is publicly available and readily provided
by state government offices.»
Forget kissing babies: Success on the trail is more about big
data, online advertising, and ferreting out undecided
voters by following a digital trail.
The information did not include highly sensitive information like Social Security numbers, and much of it was publicly available
voter - registration
data provided
by state government officials, a company spokesman told Business Insider on Tuesday.
It was Zuckerberg's job in the hearing to provide reassurance in the wake of the news that political
data firm Cambridge Analytica harvested information from more than 87 million Facebook users to create
voter profiles that were used
by Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
In the race to advance
data - driven electioneering strategies pioneered
by successive Obama campaigns, Cruz has turned to Cambridge Analytica for its unparalleled offering of psychological
data based on a treasure trove of Facebook «likes», allowing it to match individuals» traits with existing
voter datasets, such as who owned a gun.
This was a year after University of Cambridge researcher Aleksandr Kogan first obtained the
data and around the same time that Cambridge Analytica, which was co-founded
by Steve Bannon, sought out
voter data with financial support from the Trump campaign.
Its report about Facebook covering the period from 2015 to 2017 — a time during which Cambridge Analytica may have tapped Facebook
data to create «psychographic» profiles of
voters — found that Facebook's privacy controls «were operating with sufficient effectiveness,» according to copies of its reviews obtained through open - records requests
by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC, a watchdog group.
WASHINGTON — The political action committee founded
by John R. Bolton, President Trump's incoming national security adviser, was one of the earliest customers of Cambridge Analytica, which it hired specifically to develop psychological profiles of
voters with
data harvested from tens of millions of Facebook profiles, according to former Cambridge employees and company documents.
The
data collected
by the app reportedly was shared with Cambridge Analytica and used to help the firm build profiles of individual
voters and their political preferences to better target advertising to them.
This was Mr. Zuckerberg's first appearance before Congress, prompted
by the revelation that Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm linked to the Trump campaign, harvested the
data of an estimated 87 million Facebook users to psychologically profile
voters during the 2016 election.
Through utilizing their vast troves of existing
data on individual
voters, constructing highly advanced
data models, and prioritizing
voters by their likelihood to vote and feelings of favorability towards each candidate, Cambridge Analytica created a unique «principal audience» of
voters to target.
In doing this we used a suite of models produced
by the
data science team, which outlined profiles such as undecided
voters or inactive supporters, and matched these audiences to online cookies, mobile devices, and social IDs.
The project is detailed in the contract as a seven step process — with Kogan's company, GSR, generating an initial seed sample (though it does not specify how large this is here) using «online panels»; analyzing this seed training
data using its own «psychometric inventories» to try to determine personality categories; the next step is Kogan's personality quiz app being deployed on Facebook to gather the full dataset from respondents and also to scrape a subset of
data from their Facebook friends (here it notes: «upon consent of the respondent, the GS Technology scrapes and retains the respondent's Facebook profile and a quantity of
data on that respondent's Facebook friends»); step 4 involves the psychometric
data from the seed sample, plus the Facebook profile
data and friend
data all being run through proprietary modeling algorithms — which the contract specifies are based on using Facebook likes to predict personality scores, with the stated aim of predicting the «psychological, dispositional and / or attitudinal facets of each Facebook record»; this then generates a series of scores per Facebook profile; step 6 is to match these psychometrically scored profiles with
voter record
data held
by SCL — with the goal of matching (and thus scoring) at least 2M
voter records for targeting
voters across the 11 states; the final step is for matched records to be returned to SCL, which would then be in a position to craft messages to
voters based on their modeled psychometric scores.
More details have emerged about how Facebook
data on millions of US
voters was handled after it was obtained in 2014
by UK political consultancy Cambridge Analytica for building psychographic profiles
The
data was acquired and processed
by Cambridge University professor Aleksandr Kogan whose personality quiz app, running on Facebook's platform in 2014, was able to harvest personal
data on tens of millions of users (a subset of which Kogan turned into psychological profiles for CA to use for targeting political messaging at US
voters).
Groundgame, an app for election canvassing that integrates
voter data with «geospatial visualization technology,» was used
by campaigners for Trump and Brexit.
No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon, obtained
data collected from Facebook
by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built
by data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry
voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled
by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.
The calls for greater scrutiny followed reports on Saturday in The New York Times and The Observer of London that Cambridge Analytica, a political
data firm founded
by Stephen K. Bannon and Robert Mercer, the wealthy Republican donor, had used the Facebook
data to develop methods that it claimed could identify the personalities of individual American
voters and influence their behavior.
Facebook revealed on Friday that a
voter profiling firm hired
by Donald Trump and other Republicans had improperly used
data from 270,000 users of the social media platform.
In 2011, Carol Davidsen, director of
data integration and media analytics for Obama for America, built a database of every American
voter using the same Facebook developer tool used
by Cambridge, known as the social graph API.
The trove of documents shared publicly
by the company's former research director, Christopher Wylie, illustrates that granular personal
data on each of us can be used to create precise messages to any individual
voter, then delivered to us through the online ecosystem over Facebook, Instagram, Google, Twitter and other free services.
Though the users were assured that this information was gathered for academic research, but the
data was leveraged
by Cambridge Analytica to target and influence
voters with specific personality types.
WASHINGTON — Former president Barack Obama's top campaign aide on Tuesday rejected comparisons between Obama's extensive use of Facebook
data to turn out
voters in the 2012 election and the actions of Cambridge Analytica, a
data and political intelligence firm ejected last week
by Facebook in a growing controversy over social - media privacy.
But in the years in between, developers of everything from dating apps to
voter - outreach tools used
by the Obama campaign, capitalized on Facebook's rules to extract massive amounts of
data about Facebook users and their friends.
Looking at that Pew
data, I am impressed
by how many people now identify themselves as independent
voters.
Also note that companies like Catalist and NGPVAN don't just sell the
voter file; they typically add additional
data, for instance
by cross-referencing
voter information with consumer databases to build up demographic profiles of individual citizens.
The current edition leads off with a discussion of the
voter -
data infrastructure being created
by the Koch brothers» political machine, centered around consulting firm i360.
Crucially, all of this activity both generates
data (on individual
voters) and is driven
by data, as Sasha Issenberg has so carefully documented this year:
Political
data nerds LOVE to use tools like the VAN backend
voter management system to slice and dice outreach lists
by all kinds of criteria — age, location, voting history, and....
Commercial marketers usually have a wealth of
data to work with, from demographics to credit history to homeownership, but when he started working in politics, Ghani was struck
by the fact that political campaigns are trying to build
voter models based on a handful of
data points.
It stands accused of harvesting Facebook user
data to profile
voters that that were ultimately targeted
by the Trump campaign, which spent over $ 6 million on information obtained
by the firm.
The firm, initially funded
by a multimillion investment
by conservative billionaire Robert Mercer and helmed
by former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, touted tools using
data to identify and sway
voters.
With conservative strategist Steve Bannon playing a founding role, backed
by money from billionaire Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah, the firm was able to develop
data from 50 million Facebook users into a psychologically - based strategy to target
voters.
The Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica more than $ 6 million to target Facebook ads based on
voter data it had collected in the run - up to the election, according to Federal Election Commission records cited
by Reuters.
The interesting angle from our point of view was the part — reported early
by Yahoo News — that urges the party to create a
data infrastructure to power the kind of
voter targeting at which the Obama campaign (among others) has excelled.
David Cameron again found himself in the crosshairs for undermining
voter confidence in official
data by using misleading NHS spending figures and appearing to abuse his privileged early access to GDP
data.
At the same time, they can be building up
data on the electorate
by talking to
voters one - on - one and developing technologies and procedures to use that
data to target their outreach efficiently, effectively and repeatedly.
In the race to advance
data - driven electioneering strategies pioneered
by successive Obama campaigns, Cruz has turned to Cambridge Analytica for its unparalleled offering of psychological
data based on a treasure trove of Facebook «likes», allowing it to match individuals» traits with existing
voter datasets, such as who owned a gun.
Voters whose existing details can not be confirmed
by data matching with a single Department for Work and Pensions database of national insurance numbers have to provide additional forms of identification.
Democratic tech powerhouse NGP VAN mined the massive
voter contact
data flowing through its systems and reports that «
voter contact efforts [in 2014] are outpacing 2010
by a statistically significant margin.»
No doubt, it is a dismaying picture that confronts us: British company SCL Group, operating under the brand name Cambridge Analytica with the supervision of Steve Bannon, obtained
data collected from Facebook
by Cambridge University academic Alexandr Kogan, and used systems built
by data scientist and whistleblower - to - be Chris Wylie to train its microtargeting algorithms to nudge scores of already - angry
voters towards electing Donald Trump and leaving the European Union — a set of experiments largely bankrolled
by US hedge - fund billionaire Robert Mercer, 90 % owner of Cambridge Analytica.
District -
by - district figures on school budgets, tax caps, pay raises and other
data are included in Newsday's School
Voters Guide.
Beset
by corruption, backroom deals and
voter scorn, New York received a score of 61, a D -, placing it in 31st place nationwide in the State Integrity Investigation, a
data - driven assessment of state government accountability and transparency conducted
by the Center for Public Integrity and Global Integrity.