Not exact matches
And according to a top - secret National Security Agency document leaked to the Intercept and published earlier this month, hackers associated with Russia's military intelligence agency targeted a company with
information on US voting software days before the election and used the
data to launch «
voter - registration - themed» cyberattacks on local government officials.
Politics today is more about crunching
data —
voter demographic
information, tracking what individual
voters care about, and campaign donation histories — and then acting on it.
Deep Root emphasized in its statement that the
data that was accessed «was, to the best of our knowledge, proprietary
information as well as
voter data that is publicly available and readily provided by state government offices.»
The
information did not include highly sensitive
information like Social Security numbers, and much of it was publicly available
voter - registration
data provided by state government officials, a company spokesman told Business Insider on Tuesday.
It was Zuckerberg's job in the hearing to provide reassurance in the wake of the news that political
data firm Cambridge Analytica harvested
information from more than 87 million Facebook users to create
voter profiles that were used by Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
The Cruz algorithm was then applied to what the campaign calls an «enhanced
voter file,» which can contain as many as 50,000
data points gathered from voting records, popular websites and consumer
information such as magazine subscriptions, car ownership and preferences for food and clothing.
Kogan harvested and sold that
data to Cambridge Analytica, a political firm that would use
information on identity, social networks and likes to target demographics and influence
voters.
Its report about Facebook covering the period from 2015 to 2017 — a time during which Cambridge Analytica may have tapped Facebook
data to create «psychographic» profiles of
voters — found that Facebook's privacy controls «were operating with sufficient effectiveness,» according to copies of its reviews obtained through open - records requests by the Electronic Privacy
Information Center, or EPIC, a watchdog group.
Revelations that a
voter - profiling company that worked Donald J. Trump's presidential campaign harvested private
information from 50 million Facebook profiles have many people wondering: What, if anything, can they do to protect their
data connected to the social network?
A
voter - profiling company was able to harvest
data of 50 million Facebook profiles even though only about 270,000 users agreed to hand over their
information.
Which does rather underline CA's priorities in this project: Obtain, as fast as possible, lots of personal
data on US
voters, but don't worry much about keeping that personal
information safe.
Reacting to revelations that the political research and consulting firm Cambridge Analytica obtained Facebook user
data for the purpose of influencing
voters in multiple countries, the Internet Society called it «the natural outcome of today's
data driven economy that puts businesses and others first, not users» and called for «higher standards for transparency and ethics when it comes to the handling of our
information.
Dubbed Facebook's «collapse» of public trust, the double revelation that Cambridge Analytica, ostensibly a
voter - profiling company, collected the
data of 50 million Facebook accounts without user permission, and that thousands of third - party developers built apps on Facebook's platform to gather private
information has spurred international outrage.
That's the question many Americans are asking after revelations that a
data - mining firm working for the Trump campaign improperly got its hands on the personal
information of tens of millions of Facebook users and created detailed profiles that were used to target unsuspecting
voters in the presidential election.
A personality research app he created gathered the personal
information on 270,000 Facebook users, as well as
data on those users» friends, amplifying the reach to the tens of millions when it passed that
data to Cambridge for a
voter targeting scheme.
(U.S. Edition) Cambridge Analytica, the
data firm that harvested personal
information from Facebook users to target
voters in the 2016 presidential election, is filing for bankruptcy.
Facebook continues to reel from increased scrutiny and criticism in the wake of allegations that it provided users» personal
information to
data firm Cambridge Analytica, which was then used to influence
voters in the 2016 US presidential campaign.
Though the users were assured that this
information was gathered for academic research, but the
data was leveraged by Cambridge Analytica to target and influence
voters with specific personality types.
Kogan later passed this
information on to
voter - profiling firm Cambridge Analytica, which claimed (but now denies) that it used the
data to craft political ads for President Trump's 2016 election.
The Guardian reports the U.K.
Information Commissioner's Office is launching an investigation into the collection and use of
voters» personal
data in political campaigns.
Also note that companies like Catalist and NGPVAN don't just sell the
voter file; they typically add additional
data, for instance by cross-referencing
voter information with consumer databases to build up demographic profiles of individual citizens.
With optimized charts and averages, PollTracker 2012 follows important swing states, provides key
voter group
information (independents, gender breakdown,
voter subgroups) and offers specific detailed candidate
data.
At one of this year's many
data - focused Netroots Nation panels, former Obama
data guru Ethan Roeder noted something about the effective use of
voter - targeting technologies: that's it's less about the
data itself, and more about creating a culture of letting the
information in...
Some of this
data would have been recognizable to party operatives at the turn of the 19th century, such as
voter files that contain
information about the party registration and issue interests of citizens.
Update: A reader writes in to point out that Trump DOES have a
data operation whether he knows it or not, and it's true that his campaign's purchased
voter information from L2.
It stands accused of harvesting Facebook user
data to profile
voters that that were ultimately targeted by the Trump campaign, which spent over $ 6 million on
information obtained by the firm.
Although basic
voter information is public record, Deep Root's dataset contains a swirl of proprietary
information from the RNC's
data firms.
Trump's election integrity commission will make public records requests to obtain
voter data from the states that have refused to turn over that
information, the commission's vice chair said.
But it is home to the largely secret engine of President Obama's re-election campaign, where scores of political strategists,
data analysts, corporate marketers and Web producers are sifting through
information gleaned from Facebook,
voter logs and hundreds of thousands of telephone or in - person conversations to reassemble and re-energize the scattered coalition of supporters who swept Mr. Obama into the White House four years ago.
Taking their lead from some of the best US campaigns, parties have been making extensive use of polling, local intelligence from
voters, and additional useful
information like consumer
data, to produce microtargeted campaigns to raise turnout amongst specific groups in target seats.
The takeaway: Down - ballot campaigners are really using
data, and they want advanced options for tracking and using
information about
voters, supporters and donors.
The party also distributed thousands of detailed surveys to
voters in marginals, and merged all this polling
data with
information from electoral rolls and commercial market research to produce the most comprehensive picture yet of who might be persuaded to vote Conservative.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo had refused the request for
voter roll
data in June, which asked for public
information as well as private
information such as
voters» social security numbers.
Alaskans won't find any
information about Trump in their
voter's guide this year, after the GOP presidential nominee's campaign failed to submit biographical
data and a candidate statement.
It said it would merge that
information with consumer and
voter history
data to identify and target
voters.
In this past cycle, they also used the latest
data analysis and targeting techniques to decide which
voters to contact, with key
information streaming to mobile apps in the hands of canvassers going door - to - door.
This
information is based on
voter enrollment
data released by New York State in November of 2017 https://www.elections.ny.gov/EnrollmentSD.html
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's election integrity commission will make public records requests to obtain
voter data from the states that have refused to turn over that
information, the commission's vice chair said Wednesday.
Washington (CNN) Democratic
data gurus are lashing out at Hillary Clinton after she complained publicly that her campaign was hamstrung by a party that had out - of - date
information on individual
voters.
Data sets containing
voter names and demographic
information like addresses, party affiliation and even gender can be purchased or downloaded — often from government sites themselves — for only a few dollars.
Sweeney conceded, however, that altering
voter information may not be as simple as finding the right
data.
We used publicly available
data, such as
information from
voter registration files, and what was reported to the campaign by people canvassing their neighborhoods, as well as
information posted on Facebook and what was given in response to email requests.
But the implications for the future evolution of technologies that can spread hyper - biased or false
information — combined with firms who have
data to conduct psychological targeting of
voters — are real.
According to the Statistical Policy Working Paper 22, the two main sources of disclosure risk for de-identified records about individuals are the existence of records with very unique characteristics (e.g., unusual occupation or very high salary or age) and the existence of external sources of records with matching
data elements which can be used to link with the de-identified
information and identify individuals (e.g.,
voter registration records or driver's license records).
The app collected psychological test
data from Facebook users and their friends and shared the
information with Cambridge Analytica, allowing the firm to deliver pro-Trump messaging to potential
voters online.
Kogan harvested and sold that
data to Cambridge Analytica, a political firm that would use
information on identity, social networks and likes to target demographics and influence
voters.
Other strategic
information could include: connected third party application
data; comments and likes on public Facebook pages; internet browsing history through Facebook APIs and scripts; consumer loyalty programs, mobile app logins; publicly shared photos and profile
information that users forget about; and (I'm presuming) more mundane tactics such as harnessing unassuming personality «quizzes» on Facebook that capture invaluable psychometric
data people readily share with their friends and families, but not with a psychological
voter profiling firm.
In another case, in the late stages of the November election, Schweickert said the company acquired
data on
voters who voted early —
data it collected from local counties and states — and linked the
information to individual Facebook profiles.
Cambridge Analytica, a political
data firm hired by President Trump's 2016 election campaign, gained access to
information on 50 million Facebook users as a way to identify the personalities of American
voters and influence their behavior.
Indeed, the Obama campaign was heralded for its
data savviness in connecting with potential
voters and also used Facebook profile
information to target ads (though, to be clear, the Obama campaign didn't violate Facebook's terms, as Cambridge Analytica did).