Not exact matches
Similarly, the power of Google's search algorithm to surreptitiously shift voting
preferences of undecided
voters by 20 - 80 percent is highly troubling — and not only
because it could potentially threaten the basic principles of democracy.
Ultimately the government will have to choose between large numbers of
voters choosing pre-determined
preference orderings by voting above the line or large numbers of
voters having their
preferences ignored
because they did not express them properly on the ballot paper.
Vote splitting most easily occurs in plurality voting
because the ballots don't gather any information about the secondary
preferences of the
voters.
A: No mystery;
because the Conservative Party is traditionally the second choice of relatively few
voters and they therefore wish to count weak second
preferences as on a par with strong first
preferences.
Although it is not regarded as truly proportional by campaigners for electoral reform, AV is favoured by some
because it maintains the constituency link, ensures elected MPs have the support of at least 50 per cent of
voters and allows supporters of minority parties to express opinion through their first vote while giving their second
preference to a mainstream party.
Things are complicated
because individual
voters do not just have a general party -
preference vote that will decide this overall make up of the parliament, but also vote for a personal representative to represent their local constituency.
It will legitimise them
because in marginal seats Labour will have to chase the second
preferences of UKIP / BNP
voters.
Then we are told that it will somehow make MPs more accountable and more diligent,
because they will all be obliged to get the combined first and second -
preference support of 50 per cent of the
voters.
It is said that the Liberal Democrats will do well out of the change
because their candidates are normally the second choice of Labour and Tory
voters and therefore, since AV counts second
preferences, more of them will be elected.
Yet Labour are fearful of Goldsmith's ability to reach out to Lib Dem and Green
voters because of his opposition to a third runway at Heathrow, especially after former Green mayoral candidate Baroness Jenny Jones appeared to endorse a second
preference for Goldsmith earlier this year.
Its better
because it doesn't transfer the power that it does to the second
preferences of smaller party
voters (a numerically small group) in an democratically unaccountable way.
The main reason smaller parties don't win more seats is
because potential
voters don't expect them to get enough votes and would rather choose a second
preference over a third or lower
preference.
Larger Party
voters will be wasting their time casting any more
preferences than their first (which also gives the lie to the myth it will «encourage» them to support smaller parties; it simply wont
because their first choice will not be eliminated therefore this support will be as non-existant as it was under FPTP).
Because of the importance of the election and the familiarity of
voters with the candidates, polls tend to measure actual
voter preferences throughout the campaign.
This is
because almost two in three Labour
voters would have given their second
preferences to the Lib Dems in Conservative - Lib Dem contests, while Lib Dem supporters preferred Labour rather than the Tories by a margin of three - to - two in Lab - Con seats.
Because few
voters turn out for primaries, a tiny number of
voters supporting a radical candidate in a «safe» district can end - run around general
voters»
preferences.
Now Facebook is the hot new political consultant
because it controls all the valuable data about
voter preferences and behavior.