While there have always been two sides in an election and a large percentage of
voters explaining to their children why one particular candidate won, or lost, that is not the substance of the calls I'm getting.
Not exact matches
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Evan Lukaske said in a news release Thursday: «Next year, Zeldin will have
to explain to voters why he's partnering with a man who supported an alleged
child molester.»
Shilling said Democrats must connect with rural
voters better and better
explain that they've been working on issues important
to them, including
child care and keeping small businesses going.
As Bush strategist Karl Rove
explained in his book Courage and Consequence: «When Bush said education was the civil rights struggle of our time or that the absence of an accountability system in our schools meant black, brown, poor, and rural
children were getting left behind, it gave listeners important information about his respect and concern for every family and deepened the impression that he was a different kind of Republican whom suburban
voters... could be proud
to support.»
Instead of pouncing on Mr. Bush, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio might
explain to voters why Barack Obama has spent his entire presidency trying
to shut down a school voucher program in Washington, D.C., that gives poor black and brown
children access
to private schools and, according
to the Education Department's own evaluation, improves their chances of graduating by as much as 21 percentage points.