Sentences with phrase «voters see it the way»

All we can do is put all the info forward and hope more voters see it the way we do.

Not exact matches

We see one way to loosen the hold Democrats have on the black electorate: for African Americans to become strategic voters.

Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the way they did is because they saw some fake news.

The bottom line is that the American public is being fed a carefully crafted mythology (no doubt «market tested» on «response groups» to see which images fly best) to mislead the American public into misunderstanding the nature of today's financial problem — to mislead it in such a way that today's policies will make sense and gain voter support.

With every passing week, and especially since the party caught a bit of a break in some polls, the Conservative narrative seems to be based on the notion that enough voters have seen the error of their 2015 ways to return the Conservatives to government next year.

But I also would have graciously acknowledged that if 75 % of the voters didn't feel that way, I was seeing something that others didn't.

But I also would have graciously acknowledged that if 75 % of the voters didn't feel that way (about a specific player), I was seeing something that others didn't.

Education policymakers — including big city mayors such as Chicago's Rahm Emanuel (D)-- see rating teachers by student test scores as reasonable and know voters and big foundations feel the same way.

... increasingly, many campaigns see text messages as a primary way of getting in touch with voters.

University of Manchester research funded by The Economic and Social Research Council found that though TV is still a prized channel for voter communication, online news sources, email and newer social networking tools are now seen as an important way for parties to reach the public.

Then David turns to Professor Simon Szreter — social historian and founder of «History & Policy» — to discuss how academics are trying to find ways of restoring the public's faith in politics, and bridge the gap between the politicians» narrow view of the world and how the voters see it.

I have seen this way of telling the voters what...

In some races, turnout saw an increase (which was not a statewide trend), but voters were not backing Clinton at the top of the ticket the same way they went for Obama.

Someday yes, but without infallible voter identification and some way of ensuring security at the network level, I can't see this happening yet.

I think unfortunately apathy is the more common thing that you see in a year like this, voters that are just frustrated and angry or frustrated and angry, but angry in a way that doesn't translate into action.

But progressives, like Our Revolution's Nina Turner, see value in the way Nixon is campaigning and approaching black voters in particular.

«Prince» Anthony Weiner is in big trouble, the voters in his district are «MAD» at «Big Brother» Obama, Washington DC, etc, etc, and they see voting for the Republ - I - CAN as a way of sending a message «We are not going to take it anymore», plus I am sure there are many people who live outside the state and have seen the «PRINCE» in action on CNN < C - SPAN, etc and will be willing to send a check to him as a way of saying «BYE BYE WEINER» Before there was the «Oracle at Delphi» there was Count Vampire J. Machiavelli VJ Machiavelli http://www.vjmachiavelli.blogspot.com No More Schumer, Pelosi, Rangel, Engel «After Four Years of Scandals it is time for the Lazio Team»

For Labour, concessions to this by constant apologies that the last government got it «wrong» on immigration or saying there are «legitimate concerns» on immigration are seen in the same way and risk repelling significant sections of the electorate, especially among those Labour needs to win over or persuade to turn out — notably 2010 Liberal Democrats and ethnic minority voters.

Labour fought an insurgent campaign in which Corbyn deftly exploited his status as the underdog; the Labour party appears to have excited young people as well as so - called «left behind» voters in ways not seen for decades.

The council speaker has heavily courted Latino voters, but observers see major issues still in her way.

He was seen as «odd» by voters — not least for the way he challenged his own brother for the Labour leadership in 2010.

As polls show President Barack Obama inching his way to a solid lead, McCarthy believes voters still want to see Romney's debate performances before they make their final decision on Election Day.

«It remains to be seen if Hillary Clinton is going to drive voters to the polls the way Barack Obama did,» said Brian Baluta, a Heck campaign spokesman.

Garvin sees it as a way to do everything from voter registration to a form of geography - based polling and fundraising to election day poll - watching.

Replacing Howard with a leader who is seen as less extreme should help the Conservatives move people's perception of them closer to the centre ground, and once Labour's leader is a figure who is percieved as being on the other side of the psychological left - right divide they may be in a better position to win support back from Labour amongst right - of - centre voters, but either way you cut it they are still as by far the most extreme of the three main parties.

Sad but true, however I would like to see them take control though that way the voters need to see their plans.

«I saw that meeting as my doing my job of trying to find a way to convey, in any way I could, that the public and even his voters had fierce opposition to the education cuts,» she said, adding that she told Bannon their polling showed half of Trump's voters opposed his cuts.

Big setpiece events like this and the Budget make a difference to the way voters see the government in a way that other government changes — a consultation here or a draft bill there — simply don't.

They found a VP candidate who scared the living daylights out of middle of the road voters, and energized the Democratic base in a way we haven't seen since JFK.

Cameron and Clegg have both said that they see no need for a referendum on Lords reform, because voters backed the idea at the 2010 general election, but Labour are demanding one and, with Tory rebels threatening to support them, ministers may decide that granting a referendum is the only way to get the legislation through the Commons.

«What we are seeing here is that as voters begin to pay more attention to this race, the momentum is swinging our way and the race is breaking towards the candidate most capable of cleaning up Albany, holding Wall Street accountable, and protecting New York families,» Rice campaign manager Jeffrey Stein said in a statement.

But she now stands for election against someone who, like Latimer, connects with the voters in a way not usually seen in politics.

Alternatively, if Clement walks out of court with the Democratic line, voters could see a four way race between him, Gallo, Polacco and Cahill.

But those republicans jumped on the bandwagon now they see they can reach out to voters this way.

The move is seen as a potential way of restoring trust between voters and parliament and drawing a line under the expenses scandal.

But voters don't see it that way.

«What we are seeing here is that as voters begin to pay more attention to this race, the momentum is swinging our way and the race is breaking towards the candidate most capable of cleaning up Albany, holding Wall Street accountable, and protecting New York families.»

Where the Conservatives have more grounds for optimism are some of the other questions asked in the recent polls about David Cameron — a recent ICM poll that found that David Cameron was seen as a potential PM, a person who could change the way people thought about the Conservatives and a person who over a third of Labour voters and almost half Lib Dem voters said they could vote for; another ICM poll that found that 40 % of people thought that Cameron was the natural heir of Tony Blair — these sort of findings were definitely not seen after Michael Howard became leader.

And, if history is any guide, he might just be able to elevate the profile of the post to a level never seen before - one that requires voters to sit up and take notice, maybe even all the way to Albany and beyond.

The need for Labour to attract current conservative voters to win an election, let alone UKIP ones who had previously voted labour, seemed important a year ago, now keeping current Labour voters, from either holding their nose and voting Tory or Liberal Democrat, is more of a long way off goal, our core demographic of voters a year ago, were socially liberal, economically conservative, mainly pro EU, ones who would see the Liberal Democrats as a natural choice, many may have voted Libdem in 2005 and later, only to return to us due to the coalition.

In this light, Corbyn is seen as a refreshing change, to all that spin, the real deal, in the traditional, Tony Benn, Old Labour Party way, (apart from his potential, Islington, Margaret Hodge kind of legacy), not the Hilary Benn, slippery fish, blarite, New Labour nonsence, that voters have now woken up to.

As opposed to 2014, Cox sees a clear path for a Republican victory this year — with the governor's mounting scandals, his second - term swing to the left that has created resentment upstate, and his use of the race as a springboard for a presidential bid, which Cox said would rub voters the wrong way.

That way, Labour could win back voters defecting to the Greens and the Scottish National Party in search of a centre - left alternative, not to mention the millions who now see insufficient reason to vote at all.

But, in Oldham East and Saddleworth, a place which had been a three - way marginal in 2010, voters just saw a straight choice between Labour and the Tory - Lib Dem coalition.

«I saw it in seat after seat after seat, this growing alarm about the SNP and Labour and the amplification of the Conservative message and the way it was being echoed in the broadcast media terrified a lot of English voters and pushed them in a Conservative direction.

I suspect that they will win some of the Labour seats on their target list (and I listed the top 50 in that blog post last summer), but I'm not convinced that there will be that many: their position on Iraq marked them out from the other two parties at the last election, leading them to the high water mark they reached - but Iraq will not be an issue next year and it is hard to see which message they could put out which would resonate with voters in the same way.

Also nestling its way into voters» minds from the Beverly Hilton ballroom was Meryl Streep, who was considered a bubble candidate at best for her role as a bad opera singer in the little - seen «Florence Foster Jenkins.»

In the case of «Three Billboards,» it is most likely a variety of factors: The backlash started after many had already seen the film and formed their own opinions; And it's still just a guessing game as to whether hot takes impact what voters think in a statistically significant way.

I love Martin Scorsese, but I can easily see if the 4 hour cut felt like it had to be the final cut, then it should've stayed that way and not be under the scrutiny of Academy voters.

And in the Best Documentary Feature category, where it can help to come out early in the year — that way you avoid being lost in the deluge of screeners that voters in the Documentary Branch receive — we've already seen a strong contender in the political doc «Weiner,» and a complete wild card in ESPN's five - part, seven - and - a-half-hour «O.J.: Made in America.»