Not exact matches
As a proud Republican, casting my
vote for President has usually been a simple
matter.
Exxon is recommending a
vote on executive pay every three years, although pay is awarded annually and shareholders
as a general
matter tend to prefer annual
votes.
All of the
matters scheduled to be
voted on at the Annual Meeting are «non-routine,» except for the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as Google's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.
If you grant a proxy, the persons named
as proxy holders, Larry Page, Eric E. Schmidt, Patrick Pichette, David C. Drummond, and Kent Walker, or any of them, will have the discretion to
vote your shares on any additional
matters properly presented for a
vote at the Annual Meeting.
All of the
matters scheduled to be
voted on at the Annual Meeting are «non-routine,» except for the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as Alphabet's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.
then the persons named
as proxy holders, Luca Maestri and Bruce Sewell, will
vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all
matters presented in this Proxy Statement and
as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other
matters properly presented for a
vote at the Annual Meeting.
We note that, in accordance with Rule 14 (a)-6 (a), Apple was not required to file preliminary proxy materials with the Commission because the
matters to be acted on at the meeting are limited to (1) the election of directors, (2) the ratification of accountants, (3) a
vote on an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation, (4) the approval of the Plan described above, which is a «plan»
as defined in paragraph (a)(6)(ii) of Item 402 of Regulation S - K, and (5) shareholder proposals pursuant to Rule 14a - 8.
That's principled politics, too, and in terms of actually saving the country, it trumps the lambs - to - the - slaughter strategy of
voting your values
as if it
mattered.
If any other
matters are properly presented for consideration at the 2018 Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the 2018 Annual Meeting to another time or place, the persons named
as proxy holders, Elon Musk, Deepak Ahuja and Todd Maron, or any of them, will have discretion to
vote the proxies held by them on those
matters in accordance with their best judgment.
THE PROXIES ARE ALSO AUTHORIZED TO
VOTE UPON ALL OTHER
MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING, OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF, UTILIZING THEIR OWN DISCRETION
AS SET FORTH IN THE NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT.
If you are a shareholder of record and you indicate that you wish to
vote as recommended by our Board or if you sign, date and return a proxy card but do not give specific
voting instructions, then the proxy holders will
vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board on all
matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and the proxy holders may determine in their discretion regarding any other
matters properly presented for a
vote at our Annual Meeting.
Only 77 percent of eligible shares were
voted as of Thursday, the Wall Street Journal cited people familiar with the
matter as saying.
In addition to the election of directors (Item 1), the NYSE does not consider any of the stockholder proposals (Items 5 through 8)
as routine
matters, so your broker may not
vote on these
matters in its discretion.
Management Incentive Plan,
as amended; and (iv) each of the shareholder proposals described in this proxy statement are not
matters on which a broker may
vote without your instructions.
As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote on that matter in their discretio
As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you
as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote on that matter in their discretio
as to how to
vote on that
matter generally may
vote on that
matter in their discretion.
Furthermore, the rules governing companies listed on the NYSE and incorporated under Delaware law require us to submit certain
matters to a
vote of shareholders for approval, such
as mergers, large share issuances or similar transactions, and the approval of equity - based compensation plans.
If your Shares are held of record by a bank, broker, or other nominee, we urge you to give instructions to your bank, broker, or other nominee
as to how you wish your Shares to be
voted so you may participate in the shareholder
voting on these important
matters.
As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote your Shares on that matter in their discretio
As a result, brokers who do not receive instructions from you
as to how to vote on that matter generally may vote your Shares on that matter in their discretio
as to how to
vote on that
matter generally may
vote your Shares on that
matter in their discretion.
If you own common stock in street name and do not either provide
voting instructions or
vote at the Annual Meeting, the institution that holds your shares may nevertheless
vote your shares on your behalf with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, but can not
vote your shares on any other
matters being considered at the meeting.
In the absence of timely directions, your broker will have discretion to
vote your shares on our sole «routine»
matter: the proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm.
As a result of changes adopted by the NYSE to its broker
voting rules, including changes mandated by the Dodd - Frank Act in connection with stockholder
votes on executive compensation
matters, the NYSE does not consider the election of directors (Item 1), the advisory resolution regarding named executives» compensation (Item 2), and the advisory proposal on the frequency of future advisory
votes regarding named executives» compensation (Item 3) to be routine.
Kenney may have been less popular than his main rival Brian Jean overall, but
as former MP Patrick Brown's own victory in the last Ontario Tory campaign demonstrated, the capacity to bring one's supporters inside a party tent
matters more to the outcome of a leadership
vote than one's standing in the outside world.
«The Harvey relief would pass on its own, and to use that
as a vehicle to get people to
vote for a debt ceiling is not appropriate,» he said an interview with The Washington Post, signaling agreement with what Trump's approach on the
matter has been.
That such a gun - friendly state adopted any firearm restrictions represents a sea change, even more so
as the restrictions were drafted and approved in a
matter of three weeks, after a bipartisan
vote and the signature of a Republican governor likely to be on the ballot later this year
as a Senate candidate.
It doesn't even
matter if he is giving the people what they want —
as unlikely
as it is that the people who
voted for Donald Trump for president did so because they love Thursday night cliffhangers about who will be the next secretary of housing and urban development.
We are not saying that the individual retail investor's
vote does not
matter, but when most of the proxy materials are cast into the garbage or just
voted as suggested, it becomes more difficult to defend the argument that having each individual investors voice heard is of the utmost importance.
If you grant a proxy, the persons named
as proxy holders, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak and John F. Schultz, will have the discretion to
vote your shares on any additional
matters properly presented for a
vote at the meeting.
These responsibilities include: (i) fostering processes that allow the Board to function independently of management and encouraging open and effective communication between the Board and management of the Company; (ii) providing input to the Chairman on behalf of the independent Directors with respect to Board agendas; (iii) presiding at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present,
as well
as regularly scheduled executive sessions of independent Directors; (iv) in the case of a conflict of interest involving a Director, if appropriate, asking the conflicted Director to leave the room during discussion concerning such
matter and, if appropriate, asking such Director to recuse him or herself from
voting on the relevant
matter; (v) communicating with the Chairman and the CEO,
as appropriate, regarding meetings of the independent Directors and resources and information necessary for the Board to effectively carry out its duties and responsibilities; (vi) serving
as liaison between the Chairman and the independent Directors; (vii) being available to Directors who have concerns that can not be addressed through the Chairman; (viii) having the authority to call meetings of the independent Directors; and (ix) performing other functions
as may reasonably be requested by the Board or the Chairman.
It is not expected that any additional
matters will be brought before the Annual Meeting, but if other
matters are properly presented, the persons named
as proxies in the proxy card or their substitutes will
vote in their discretion on such
matters.
In these circumstances, if you do not provide
voting instructions, the institution may nevertheless
vote your shares on your behalf with respect to the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, but can not
vote your shares on any other
matters being considered at the meeting.
Abstentions have the same effect
as votes against the
matter except in the election of directors,
as described above.
It's not that I think he is Muslim (nor do I care if he is Christian)... what I do believe is that he thinks that people are stupid enough to
vote for him again just because he decides to parade himself
as a Christian (not that religion should
matter in politics)-- The real reason his approval numbers are down are because he is no good.
The justices, by an 8 - 1
vote, said Wednesday that members of Westboro Baptist Church had a right to promote what they call a broad - based message on public
matters such
as wars.
You also have people who can register
as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a
vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your
vote matters is by
voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually
matter?
It is all about hiding, disguising the truth until it becomes of the past just
as that
as did that unlawful country was recognized by the USA with out the UN majority
vote and UN members were to face the Reality that the USA is taking advantage of her majority states and
voting power rather than the majority of the UN member countries no
matter how small or poor they are although at that time the majority of member countries were under occoupation or protection of USA and Allies and after the WW1 & 2!
Their discomfort with cultural issues is reflected in their protests that
matters such
as partial - birth abortion, school prayer, or same - sex marriage are not proper items for political debate; they are rather «wedge issues» that conservatives illegitimately bring into the public arena in order to divide the nation (read: in order to cost Democrats
votes).
If you really believe Obama is responsible for the mess then the best thing to do is
vote for him
as the mess is coming no
matter who is President.
Considering that achieving the greatest good for the greatest number is kind of the point of democracy and any other coercive form of government, I guess you can say that Rand is opposed to the Republic
as well, although in public she essentially gutted her own philosophy and said that she was only opposed to people being allowed to
vote on
matters of private enterprise.
Most importantly, church assemblies should reclaim their role
as representative assemblies chosen to deliberate thoughtfully on significant
matters of Christian faith and life, rather than continuing to act
as legislatures that reduce everything to stark alternatives and then make hurried decisions by forced choice majority
voting.
I would like to
vote Republican but my fear of closed minded bible thumpers who want to set back our education system, social reforms, free thought and our culture
as a whole, outweighs my fear of skyrocketing national debt, slow economic growth and higher taxes (incidentally higher taxes are coming no
matter who is in power.
As The Nation pointed out after the election, «One out of every four Trump voters
voted with the Supreme Court in mind, and it's a safe bet that a very substantial number of those see the Supreme Court through the lens of abortion politics... If you can rally voters around abortion, few other issues
matter.»
The conservative lawyers who screen the candidates for judgeships seek to be prudent by nimbly avoiding anything so plain and direct
as asking the candidates exactly how they would
vote on these
matters.
In fact, the idea that the UK would leave the EU was so preposterous that many
voted in favor of it simply
as an act of protest, motivated by the assumption that their
vote «wouldn't
matter» because «remain» would win out anyway.
i would have to disagree there
as it is a board of directors with 6 members
as far
as i know, and they all have an equal
vote on club
matters, otherwise stan might
as well liquidate the board
as is and just make all the decisions himself that would be easier for him.
It is argued that
as EVEL only applies to
matters that are
voted on in the House of Commons, it doesn't apply to government and executive decisions.
As a
matter of fact, the Orbán administration has had all the
votes they need.
We call on the government to publish these proposals
as a Bill and give Parliament a free
vote on the
matter.
When citizens of a nation queue,
as in our case in Ghana, to
vote and elect a president to steer their affairs, it is a
matter of trust.
«Neither will we allow the people of these islands, no
matter how they
voted on June 23rd, to be presented
as a reactionary, xenophobic mass whose only concern is somehow taking the UK back to a lost imperial age.
While I again agree with him that,
as a
matter of principle, «MPs will have to do their duty to
vote according to conscience and
vote for what's best for Britain.