Sentences with phrase «voting decisions on»

People base their voting decisions on all sorts of things — who they trust, how they're feeling, the personalities and the politics.

The CCO makes all voting decisions on behalf of a Discretionary Account based solely on the CCO's determination of the best interests of that Discretionary Account.

That would be, anyone who says they base their voting decisions on what they hear from God, is automatically disqualified from public office.

A Morrow Sodali survey finds that 68 percent of institutional investor respondents cite as highly important «the quality and completeness of [a company's] disclosures on business strategy and issues of material importance» when making voting decisions on director elections and other agenda items.

Many people make their voting decision on other factors than just which party ideology aligns most with their own.

Not exact matches

In a 4 - 1 decision today, the five commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission voted to lift the ban on general solicitation and general advertising of fundraising rounds.

It's absolutely clear that whatever the «deal» was when the startup got started about everyone being consulted and having a vote on every important decision, it doesn't usually last beyond the first fundraising.

Today's must - read story is from Fortune «s Tory Newmyer and it looks at labor federation AFL - CIO's decision to lift a freeze on political contributions that it imposed in March in a move meant to pressure Democrats to vote against free trade measures.

In this model, you are making your employees your business partners: they now have the right to vote on decisions and to collect a share of the profits of the business.

By an accidental irony, the vote as President Donald Trump nears a decision on whether to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord.

Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the way they did is because they saw some fake news.

Cabinet ministers have been at odds over policy, including citizenship laws, the national vote on same - sex marriage and competition reform, as well as being left out of the decision loop on a series of «captain's picks» by the prime minister.

A second problem: Nobody wants decisions made by people who don't understand what they're voting on.

By 335 votes to 244, the House of Lords backed an amendment to the government's key Brexit bill to give Parliament decision - making power on the outcome of negotiations with the EU — including the power to call off the divorce.

«I fully support this transaction and the Board's decision to pursue it, and will vote my shares in accordance with their recommendation on it.»

(According to the Journal, the business school's faculty will vote on the decision early next month.)

What is certain is that global markets are likely to see heavy trading on Friday, the day after Britain's vote, as investors could adjust their holdings based on the country's decision.

British companies reduced their investment plans in the month after Britain voted to leave the EU, a survey by Lloyds Bank showed on Monday, a further sign the decision is likely to have a lasting impact on the economy.

A game time decision on Congress» next big legislative push — including whether or not to use a special procedural pathway in the Senate that would nix the need for any Democratic votes — may come down to what President Donald Trump tells Republican leadership during a meeting this weekend at Camp David.

The decision came more than two hours after jurors failed to cast the votes needed to deliver a verdict on all the lawsuit's claims.

Yet the area is one that has attracted interest from Russia's private sector as well, including its central securities depository which began testing blockchain proxy voting - allowing shareholders to issue votes on corporate decisions - last year.

When an individual purchases a common stock of a company, he receives one vote per stock to elect board members or decide on major decisions for the company.

Institutional investors aren't as reliant on proxy advisers to make voting decisions as some business groups and other critics might think, according to a new survey by consultancy Morrow Sodali Global LLC.

L. Rev. 83 (2010), proposes going beyond merely permitting shareholder recommendations under 14a - 8 to, among other things, majority shareholder voting on corporate speech decisions.

(One recent legal innovation was the use of blockchain to create The DAO, an autonomous, crowd - funded, and decentralized corporation managed through blockchain, where stakeholders collectively vote on decisions, such as investments from its $ 100M in assets.)

Global brands often run contests inviting their fans to vote on new products (for example, the 1995 and 2002 M&M's Color Campaigns) because the companies understand that when customers are encouraged to take part in these types of decisions, they are fostering the idea of, «We're all in this together.»

A three - day sell - off has taken the Australian sharemarket back to levels last seen in early May, as falling commodity prices and upcoming events such as a US interest rate decision and the «Brexit» vote take their toll on investor confidence.

Four - in - five say US made wrong decision in voting to removing internet protections April 4, 2018 — While the internet has grown in scale, influence and importance in the lives of most everyone on the planet over the past few decades,

Paul recounted his decision process on Twitter as the Senate Foreign Relations Committee prepared to vote on the Pompeo confirmation.

«With an increased investor focus on proxy voting, it's clear that many fiduciaries will want to be informed of such risks, which can have an impact on their ultimate vote decision.»

Other senior GOP aides cautioned that no final decision had been made, and Democrats, whose votes would be needed in the Senate, have not signed off on the approach.

It is getting tiresome hearing everyone on the radio yapping about how voters were conned by the slick campaign machinery to vote NDP; or that we voted against the PCs rather than for the NDP; or that we were angry and so made rash decisions that we will promptly regret because everyone knows what a hash the NDP have made wherever they have reigned.

In a news release Tuesday, the council said the decision follows a vote on Monday by all bargaining committee members to recommend ratification of a proposed mediation - arbitration process.

The group also bought newspaper ads in November encouraging Christians to vote for candidates who oppose same - sex marriage, support Israel and «base their decisions on biblical principles.»

But simply put, if your leadership structure is such that it requires continual committee meetings that lead to business meetings where many people get to cast votes on the direction and decisions of the church and where Roberts Rules of Order trumps biblical spiritual authority, multi-site will most likely end in a train wreck!

One friend suggested that I prayerfully reconsider my decision to vote for Obama, lest I inadvertently participate in God's plan to «raise up on evil ruler» to punish America for its immorality.

We need not take a poll to see if more voted the Holocaust morally evil than good before we can make a decision on this.

It seems to me though that voters today can obtain enough information to make an educated decision on who to vote for.

But according to Senator Gavin Marshall, chairman of the «Left federal parliamentary Labor Party caucus,» writing in The Age, Gillard's decision to allow a «conscience vote» on «gay marriage» is «not democratic,» because it «exposes individual parliamentarians to powerful conservative lobby groups» and the retrograde opinions of those «stubbornly opposed to all social reforms.»

I hate it, but I really don't see how you could get faith out of politics because a person's faith does impact their decisions day - to - day, and a voter needs to vote based on what a person will do with their authority.

Instead, they set their sights on a court fight with Proposition 8, whereby a majority of voting Californians had amended their state constitution to undo a judicial decision that had found a never before seen right to gay marriage.

Evangelical religious conservatives probably just shouldn't vote at all... that's not the kind of group i want making decisions on the running of our country.

The decision will conclude with a 5 to 4 count with old reliable Clarence Thomas, joined by Antonin Scalia, Sam Alito, John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy casting the deciding thumbs down vote on gay marriage.

Most importantly, church assemblies should reclaim their role as representative assemblies chosen to deliberate thoughtfully on significant matters of Christian faith and life, rather than continuing to act as legislatures that reduce everything to stark alternatives and then make hurried decisions by forced choice majority voting.

Maybe the media should focus on the real issues instead of the religion of the candidates we might actually get some info to use for making an intelligent decision in the voting booth.

While I would never vote for Perry my decision wouldn't be based on his personal religious veiws... and that would be discrimination for anyone that wouldn't vote for him because of those views.

In the past I've been critical of «one - issue» voters who routinely base their vote solely on a candidate's position on abortion, but I've recently toned down my criticism as I continue to speak with earnest and compassionate friends who have every right to base their decision on what touches their hearts the most.

While the Coptic Church appoints leaders by copying how the 12th apostle was picked after Judas» death (Acts 1:23 - 26), other churches rely on either voting by members (to varying degrees) or on the decision of existing leaders.

I'm trying to figure out how a woman that ignores evidence and has clearly made a slew of bad decisions throughout her life is supposed to be taken seriously when presented with a chance to vote on something serious that crosses her desk in congress.

It was a popular - vote ballot initiative in response to the Supreme Court decision on affirmative action.