Sentences with phrase «voting for an evil»

Not me, I won't be voting for evil.

But we can not vote for evil, even if it's our only option.»

I won't vote for a lesser evil, for it is STILL voting for an evil.

Not exact matches

One desperate solution was for blacks to risk voting for the candidate who represented the greater of two evils, in the hope that he would be sympathetic to African Americans because they helped secure the election.

TO choose between him or Mitt Romney a man who is evil I have no choice but to vote for President Obama, To cut a child's hair off and commit the crime he did in school is a lot different than a little boy pushing a little girl because of embarassment.

As «Faithful Citizenship» clearly says, it is a sinful cooperation with evil to vote for someone because he is pro-abortion.

In Harris» narrative, it's hard to see exactly how she comes to the conclusion that concerns for «the poor's rights» demand aligning with liberal politics rather than those of Christian conservatives, but by the end, Harris finds herself on the opposite side of the political spectrum, voting with those she had envisioned as the manifestation of evil while growing up.

But in instances when all the available candidates are pro-abortion, or when the pro-life candidate embraces other positions that are intrinsically evil, it might be permissible to vote for a pro-abortion candidate.

As a result, many Christians have chosen to vote for Trump as the lesser of two evils option.

When will we learn that evil can take many forms even one that would make you think that only Republicans are pro-life and that is the only reason to vote for them.

First, readers have told me that they are voting for Romney not because Mormonism is proper Christianity but because Romney is the lesser of two evils.

One friend suggested that I prayerfully reconsider my decision to vote for Obama, lest I inadvertently participate in God's plan to «raise up on evil ruler» to punish America for its immorality.

I hear some say, well you have to vote for the lesser of two evils.

For now it's just a wish of mine & again to vote for the lesser of the evils on both sidFor now it's just a wish of mine & again to vote for the lesser of the evils on both sidfor the lesser of the evils on both sides.

«In their comments, some evangelical leaders suggested that voting for a third party candidate or abstaining for that office was futile or a vote for the winning ticket,» noted the NAE on the «lesser of two evils» choice.

He is a Jeebus freak just like you, and you need to vote for him or the evil Mormon will kill the baby Jeebus once again.

Clearly my bias is showing, and there's obviously a lot more nuance to both partiest, the main issue though is that parties can be hijacked and have been on both sides which leaves the large majority of moderates voting for the lesser of two evils and hoping that the candidate that they vote for will drop the pandering they did to the fringe and go moderate.

Observer, Elections are about voting for the lesser of two evils.

Black folks please read the evil words towards christians here by radical dems and come home to the party of lincoln who freed ur people from slaves, u can vote for herman cain, hes at the top of all polls now with repubs

Black americans u r mostly christian, PLEASE read the evil words of radical democrats on here and please vote for HERMAN CAIN, THE WHITE RADIAL DEMS R HATE MONGERING ANTI CHRISTIAN ANIMALS

it's very disturbing to see such a large veriety of evil low lives democrates can mass together for votes.

I don't like her politics and would never vote for her but how can someone say such evil things about a mother who was trying to soften the blow to her family and explain their new brother's situation?

They would be rightly called part of the «evangelical right wing»; they believe abortion is the great evil of our generation, that the US is a Christian nation, and that «no one who is a Christian can vote for this (policy / party / person).»

This focuses the question about voting for Trump: Is he an evil politician?

when rommey first came out to run for President, all the christian stations said we do not want a cult in the white house, now the Christian are supporting him, the Bible must fulfill, in the last days we wil call evil good and good evil, I feel sorry for these so - call christian, you need to get down on your knees and ask God for direction regarding voting for a cult.

When the only vote is for the lesser of two evils, I believe the only way to truly be heard is to vote by not voting.

On the other hand we have my current (decidedly liberal) Facebook feed which is suddenly revealing itself to be full of bullies — people who are constantly telling me who to vote for and that the other option is a monster who will destroy us all with her evil vagina (but it definitely isn't about gender!).

The Republicans have a problem in that without throwing a bone to their own base upstate that regards Skelos only a step or two behind Cuomo on the «personification of evil» scale, they risk that base vote staying home in close races next year or, even worse, primaries against the senators who voted for Flanagan last week.

His campaign attracted criticism when he joked that the election was «a simple choice between good and evil», [302] and when he was accused of anti-semitism by Jewish Labour supporters for suggesting that being largely wealthy, the Jewish community would not vote for him.

As such, in elections where a large portion of electorate isn't terribly inspired by either candidates, and mostly votes for «lesser of two evils» in current FPTP, the two major party candidates just might accrue enough down - votes that a 3rd party candidate who isn't nearly as disliked will, on balance, win over both of them (or at the very least, acquire more than the abysmal 4 % combined popular vote and 0 electoral vote like 2016 US presidential elections, despite 3rd party candidates combined likely being preferred by 40 % of electorate, as a low bound).

Because obviously the reason he said this is because he is «evil» or «just doesn't get it» and really wants to screw the life out of the VOTING punters for these reasons and not, in fact, because we're in the middle of a bloody big recession and any government couldn't afford to maintain the previous levels of boom - time public spending.

Laws should be passed by a deliberative body, not a bunch of ignorant uninformed boobs being enticed to vote (quite possibly for the first time) by conniving evil doers appealing to people's worst instincts.

For single - member executive offices, LaVenia added, instant runoff voting where voters rank their choices in order of preference is a system that eliminates the incentives for lesser evil voting while insuring that the most preferred candidate is electFor single - member executive offices, LaVenia added, instant runoff voting where voters rank their choices in order of preference is a system that eliminates the incentives for lesser evil voting while insuring that the most preferred candidate is electfor lesser evil voting while insuring that the most preferred candidate is elected.

The worst thing about voting for the «lesser of two evils» is that it actually has the opposite effect of what it's intended to do.

Third, if minor parties are worried about how winner - take - all, single - member - district elections encourage voters to vote for lesser evils rather than their first choice, we want to work with them for a real solution to that problem: a system of proportional representation,» LaVenia said.

When the left calls for a vote for the lesser evil, it surrenders its independent voice and power.

General elections, being first - past - the - post, are entirely different, as voters have to vote tactically, often for the lesser of evils between the top two parties, instead of for those who represent their views.

For the left, it is hard to conjure up a more self - defeating, demoralizing, and dispiriting outcome than voting for the lesser evil and winniFor the left, it is hard to conjure up a more self - defeating, demoralizing, and dispiriting outcome than voting for the lesser evil and winnifor the lesser evil and winning!

Under winner take all elections, voters have the incentive to vote for a lesser evil rather than their most favored candidate because they are afraid it would help the candidate the like the least.

Typical the voters get to choose between to evils again, and get nothing but higher taxes and fees for their votes.

But he added that he mainly voted for Mr. Cuomo because he saw him as «the lesser of two evils.»

Her entire campaign is part of a satanic agenda involving corrupt, evil politicians like Ed Royce who had Young Kim installed in the State Assembly as she voted for forced irradiation of entire populations and forcibly injecting our children with parts of murdered, unborn children, along with cancer viruses, sterilants, IQ reducing hormones, metals, nano technology, carcinogens and toxins into the virgin bloodstreams of your children.

Santa Fe, N.M., artist Annette Ortiz says she'll be «voting for the lesser of two evils» in November.

As for the A shares, some will argue their votes have no incremental value, since Page / Brin / Schmidt still have majority control via the super-voting power of their unlisted B shares — but if you think a dual - share structure's a bit evil, just a touch more evil might see significantly different values attached to each share class in some value - realisation event!

First, the big, evil games conglomerate EA has been voted the worst company in the US for the second year in a row.

If we reach the 140k stretch goal, I'm voting for either Skyrim, Resident Evil, another Final Fantasy, Mass Effect or Persona.

Don't vote for that guy, he is evil!