Vote Better NY seeks the following common sense changes to New York's
voting laws so that every eligible New Yorker is registered to vote, voters have more than one day to get to the polls, and every voter can cast a ballot that counts:
One complication was that the authorities changed
voting laws so that every voter could cast their vote at any polling station (i.e. not necessarily where they are registered) with the inevitable consequence that many polling stations ran out of ballot papers.
Not exact matches
Vice Chancellor Strine went on to explain, however, that a corporation may in fact opt out of the default
voting — and nominating — rules of state
law, provided it does
so clearly and unambiguously:
«Many of the proposals that have been put on the table during the Trump administration have been
so far out there that they have not been able to build a 218 -
vote majority in the House of Representatives in order to get anything passed,
so the act is still the
law of the land,» Butterfield said.
I don't mind
voting for someone who knows how to follow both the letter and the spirit of the
law and who actually does
so.
This extremely narrow reading of the
law basically said «
so what if he used the course to recruit, organize and groom candidates; as long as they didn't say «
Vote for Jones», it wasn't partisan.»
It was precisely because of their deeply cherished faith that women were compelled to organize for the
vote, for women to be declared persons under the
law, for the rights of workers, for women to wear pants, for temperance even (because the victims of drunkenness were usually women and children), and
so on.
As to your second point, US
law can be changed if it's
so immoral that enough people
vote against it.
The Supreme Court has to rule based on
law,
so that California
vote is meaningless.
What I'd really like is a
law that forces our politicians to wear the logos of their major supporters on jumpsuits - sort of like NASCAR drivers,
so that when they
vote on bills and budgets, you know exactly who is paying for whom.
The petition asks that a judge intervene
so the city and its residents will be spared from «wasting resources debating and
voting on an ordinance that can not become
law.»
It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP; and one of you out of all of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post of
so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently; in the killing of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array of charges I have stored up against each of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY in perjury; to have left the seat of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do;
so he got Joe, which is Cheney all over; whom should of been out of public; and he knows that and all the fugitives, even in the Italian led court in DC; that will have to answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-; and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost;
Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor of DC; as of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a State, already; and all you slaves from State to State; need to snap out of your peonage which is prohibited by Federal
Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!
If this doc - ument is hate speech, then
so is any speech and
vote made in the US Congress against changing the
laws in the areas concerned, and the material on the group's website is hate speech too.
But he did repeal the prohibition
laws,
so he gets a good guy
vote there.
And a few years after the
vote, the
law is somehow worked arround if it isn't like they wanted to,
so it makes no difference at all.
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done
so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15
vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by
laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
So if a
law does pass with 51
votes its likely to become
law.
By successful, I mean undermined the public trust of the results sufficiently
so the winner could not successfully claim a mandate, take leadership, pass the
law - whatever the
vote was about.
The University at Buffalo
law professor, who actually teaches the subject, said she's pleased with the
vote but wants to continue to push other issues like closing the
so - called LLC loophole.
I am not even going into ~ 200 thousand who COULD have committed
voting fraud if they were inclined to do
so; again preventable by Voter ID
laws.
More than thirty years after Abrams» testimony, State Board of Elections Co-Chair Doug Kellner also endorsed the deterrent principle as the reason that
so few of New York's
voting law proposals have been rejected.
They know their ability to govern the UK could be badly damaged by the idea of English
votes for English
laws,
so any package that attempted to force through that issue would be unlikely to pass muster.
DiNapoli says
so far, around one fifth of counties have taken preliminary steps to override the cap, as they are permitted to do under the
law as long as they can muster a 60 % majority
vote from their county legislature or board of supervisors.
I suggested to him that this doesn't make much sense for the Democratic primary since the bulk of the
vote comes out of NYC, which explains why all of the Democratic hopefuls — particularly Sen. Eric Schneiderman — are running
so hard to the left and playing up issues like Rockefeller Drug
Law reform, which has zero to do with the AG's office.
It's the first time that the
so - called EVEL system (English
Votes for English
Laws) has been put into practice.
In terms of the electoral
law — well, it's FPTP,
so you're going to have a lot of councils where the winning party won an overwhelming majority of seats on less than 50 percent of the
vote.
He also said people are unaware that in minority neighborhoods — including African - American, Hispanic and Chinese — organizations «bus people around to
vote» to different polling sites
so they can get more
votes for themselves, and argued New York needs a Republican - advocated voter I.D.
law.
Benefit for illegal
voting is delayed, impersonal, and unsure —
so (IMHO) the temptation to break the
law that specific way (illegal
voting) is much lower.
E.D. Florida is also a closed primary state,
so registered independent voter in Florida attempting to
vote in a party primary would probably be violating the
law that @ notstoreboughtdirt just referenced.
In fact, our
voting laws are
so repressive that Republicans use them to promote voter suppression.
That the Labour party should
so loudly trumpet its contempt for personal privacy and the presumption of innocence, parading its violation of the European Court on Human Rights ruling on DNA retention as one of the top six reasons to
vote for it, tells you everything you need to know about its attitude to civil liberties and the rule of
law.
So should only women MPs
vote on women - only
laws?
The question of English
votes for English
laws, the
so - called West Lothian question, requires a decisive answer
so just as Scotland will
vote separately in the Scottish Parliament on their issues on tax, spending and welfare,
so too England as well as Wales and Northern Ireland should be able to
vote on these issues.
«The
law requires proportionate
voting,
so that indeed the will of the 317 (party committee members) is heard and unfortunately (the earlier)
vote when it was taken was not done on a weighted
vote,» Collins said.
Dashing Rudy's dreams of dominion (2001): When «America's mayor» proposed an unsanctioned third term
so he could keep calming the city into 2002 — and block a Democrat from his office — Silver refuses to schedule a
vote on amending term - limit
laws until after the Democrats had agreed on a nominee.
True reform in the United States will be found when the ballot access
laws are changed to open the ballots to all parties, and gerrymandering is outlawed
so entrenched politicians can be
voted out of office.
Almost immediately after the Senate
vote, City Council Speaker Melissa Mark - Viverito said she would amend the language in the new
law so that it will take effect in February instead of October, as originally planned.
so democrats are going to
vote for a guy who was supposed to be enforcing the
laws while all the time he was breaking them.
Klein's IDC provided the
votes in the Senate Banking Committee to change consumer protection
laws so that check cashers could charge up to 400 % on short term loans.
So, by U-turning, Downing Street isolated Miliband as the only party leader opposing English
votes for English
laws.
The NYS Senate however,
voted them down and instead «passed a series of
so - called school safety measures that, among other steps, would require police officers at schools in New York City and provide grants to districts outside the city to hire retired
law enforcement as school resource officers,» as reported by The NY Daily News.
«We are elated that it is being considered
so that Ghanaians outside the country can
vote as the
law says they should,» he said on Accra - based Class FM.
Whether this is down to the sheer amount of energy expended on the Scottish referendum campaign, or Labour's subsequent attempts to tackle (or sidestep) the new problem of lurking EVEL («English
Votes for English
Laws»), barnstorming rhetoric has
so far been thin on the ground in Manchester.
But in an interview on Capital Tonight, Zeldin was reluctant to say definitively if he would
vote for a
so - called «clean» continuing resolution that would fund the federal government operations that didn't include any changes to the federal health care
law of 2010.
They won't pass
laws making it easier for people to
vote, change political parties or file an absentee ballot without an excuse, because to do
so might raise voter turnout — and the risk that they might lose.
The major amendment, tabled by Viscount Hailsham (pictured) to the flagship Brexit
laws going through Parliament radically strengthens the
so - called «meaningful
vote» on the final deal.
The City Council
voted in two bills to strengthen a ban on
so - called «e-bikes,» by tossing out the part of the
law that allowed the vehicles to be used as long as they were not going faster than 15 miles per hour, Quinn said.
So as lawmakers contend with the possibility of a continued shortfall and layoffs next month, they are also under the cloud of a lawsuit brought by Onondaga County Comptroller Bob Antonacci, who claims lawmakers broke the
law when they
voted themselves a raise last year.
«It is right that we
voted for a referendum and right that we still want to hold a referendum and it is right that a Conservative government will amend the 1972 European Communities Act
so if any future government proposes to transfer new competencies or areas of power to Brussels a referendum of the British people will be required by
law.»
As a result, I hope to be able to
vote in favor of a more realistic revised local
law in the not
so distant future.