Sentences with phrase «voting right companies for»

Consultation on the eligibility of foreign companies, stapled securities and weighted voting right companies for inclusion in the Hang Seng Composite Index («HSCI»)(PDF)

28 February 2018Consultation on the eligibility of foreign companies, stapled securities and weighted voting right companies for inclusion in the Hang Seng Composite Index («HSCI»)(PDF)

Not exact matches

The list includes both privately held companies and publicly traded ones, but to be included in the ranking the family must control at least 50 % of the voting rights for a private firm, or 32 % of the voting rights for a public one.

Also, in an unprecedented move for U.S. publicly traded companies, Snap stock will have zero voting rights.

Tanner argues investing even just a portion of it would allow for the government to purchase a commanding share of almost every major company in the U.S. Even if that money were invested in index funds (which is the approach Munnell supports), the way the government managed its voting rights could effectively allow it to «pick winners» among corporate entities.

«It is entirely possible for companies not to have a PSC (person of significant control), For example, 4 shareholders with 25 % of the shares each, and 25 percent of the voting rights, none of them is a PSC.&raqfor companies not to have a PSC (person of significant control), For example, 4 shareholders with 25 % of the shares each, and 25 percent of the voting rights, none of them is a PSC.&raqFor example, 4 shareholders with 25 % of the shares each, and 25 percent of the voting rights, none of them is a PSC.»

In a conference call with analysts on April 12, Google CEO Larry Page took credit for a similar lack of voting rights at other companies.

For example, the issuer might want to make token holders entitled to corporate dividends and voting rights, or make the company's total ownership stock denominated in tokens.

If regulators were to determine that HNA is not qualified — for example, because it is poorly financed — the company could be forced to sell its stake or be stripped of its voting rights.

Finding a replacement for Mr. Kalanick, who built up the company aggressively, is likely to be complicated because he will remain a presence at Uber: He still has a board seat and voting rights.

For most companies, however, unequal voting rights simply allow bad managers to avoid accountability.

Mr. Garland and his team are responsible for developing and implementing the Funds» active ownership programs for public equities, including voting proxies, engaging portfolio companies on their environmental, social and governance policies and practices, and advocating for regulatory reforms to protect investors and strengthen shareholder rights.

One of the earliest examples was the International Silver Company, whose common stock (issued in 1898) had no voting rights until 1902 and then only received one vote for every two shares.

The lesson: Redstone controls both CBS and Viacom through an unusual holding structure that gives her nearly 80 percent of voting rights for each company, despite both being publicly traded.

This isn't always the case with an ICO and just having the company's cryptocurrency doesn't guarantee voting or management rights; they are just something to be exchanged for other currencies at a later date.

Even if you own just 1 share of stock in General Electric (for example), you still own part of the company.Shareholders have voting rights and they profit when the company does well.

In the event that (i) the Board of Directors proposes, recommends, approves or otherwise submits to the shareholders of the Company, for shareholder action, a Deemed Liquidation Event, and (ii) a Holder has not received written notice from the holders of a majority of the shares of Key Holder Common Stock that such holders approve the Deemed Liquidation Event, then such Holder hereby agrees to vote (in person, by proxy or by action by written consent, as applicable) all shares of capital stock of the Company now or hereafter directly or indirectly owned of record or beneficially by such Holder against the Deemed Liquidation Event, to assert statutory dissenters» rights with respect to the Deemed Liquidation Event, and to take such other action in derogation of the Deemed Liquidation Event as shall be requested by the holders of a majority of the shares of Key Holder Common Stock in order to carry out the terms and provision of this Section x.y..

Shareholder — The people or organizations who posses some quantity of equity ownership of a company, usually in the form of stock; depending on the ownership formula, shareholders may be entitled to voting rights, dividend payments, or certain degrees of influence in the company, or bear accountability for its management

Boehner is manipulative and a hypocrite — actually helping the oil companies by handing out their campaign checks for them right there on the house floor (you couldn't make this up) before a related vote.

Amid calls for passing the progressive agenda that ranges from protections for health care, abortion rights and the public financing of campaigns, Klein and company reiterated on Monday votes should be indeed be held.

However, late last year he voted against a measure that would have given any company the right to deny women preventative - health coverage for almost any reason for a one - year period.

There is no adjustment for differing voting rights among multiple share classes of a single company.

An arrangement to place the control of a company in the hands of certain managers for a given period of time, or until certain results have been achieved, by shareholders surrendering their voting rights to a trustee for a specified period of time.

I don't really think that the voting rights for the class A shares have any value because Malone controls the company with his supervoting B shares, so I discounted this seeming difference and dove in.

There are a few exceptions to this rule; e.g., we own about 35 % of GEICO Corporation but, because we have assigned our voting rights, the company is treated for accounting purposes as a less - than - 20 % holding.

Many European Union (EU) member states offer exemptions only when the resident company holds at least 10 percent of the subsidiary's share capital or voting rights for some specified period of time.

However, where can one found reliable information about the number of issued stock, the voting rights, if there is more than one kind of stock for a given company, if the dividends are always paid, etc..

When you own a share, you have the right (but not obligation) to attend the shareholder's meeting for that company, vote on important company decisions, and you have a right to a share of any future earnings that company makes.

Owning common stock gives the stockholder certain rights when it comes to governing the issuing company like voting for management changes and making certain policy decisions.

As a brief overview, the Management and Board have embarked upon a failed merger that garnered virtually no support from its shareholders, and was opposed by ISS, and continued on that path until the date of the special shareholders meeting and scheduled vote, spending lavishly in a failed effort to close it; attempted to implement substantial new options to itself, a plan opposed by ISS and the shareholders, which was withdrawn; continually paid itself outrageous sums of the shareholders money over the past three years; rejected highly qualified outside board members with deep, broad healthcare company experience supported by its shareholders; held many Board and Committee meetings with nothing to show for it; formed a new Strategic Transactions Committee that is highly paid but that has produced no deals for the shareholders to consider or for any outside valuation experts to formally review; spent lavishly on accountants, auditors and counsel; failed to successfully hire any outside professional negotiators and finally extinguish or remove the outstanding lease obligations; distributed no cash to the shareholders despite holding excess amounts; formed no special purpose entity to hold any royalty and milestone rights and payments for the benefit of its shareholders; and thus generally failed in its fiduciary duties to shareholders.

As mentioned in the proposal, foreign company's equity shares should not exceed 49 % of the insurance company's total paid - up equity capital; provided that the voting rights are not exceed by 26 % in aggregate for these foreign shareholders.

Connor knows Facebook's stock ownership structure means CEO Mark Zuckerberg holds the majority of the voting rights to the Menlo Park company, but «what we'd really like is for (the) company to recognize that these are substantial issues, and you need to engage with shareholders.»

On issues such as CRISPR and genetic engineering the EU is regulating itself out of the competition and many businesspeople are unaware that this will get much worse once the ECJ starts using the Charter of Fundamental Rights to seize control of such regulation for itself, which will mean not just more anti-science regulation but also damaging uncertainty as scientists and companies face the ECJ suddenly pulling a human rights «top trump» out of the deck whenever they fancy (one of the many arguments Vote Leave made during the referendum that we could not get the media to report, partly because of persistent confusion between the COFR and the Rights to seize control of such regulation for itself, which will mean not just more anti-science regulation but also damaging uncertainty as scientists and companies face the ECJ suddenly pulling a human rights «top trump» out of the deck whenever they fancy (one of the many arguments Vote Leave made during the referendum that we could not get the media to report, partly because of persistent confusion between the COFR and the rights «top trump» out of the deck whenever they fancy (one of the many arguments Vote Leave made during the referendum that we could not get the media to report, partly because of persistent confusion between the COFR and the ECHR).

EFF, together with Durie Tangri LLP, is defending a photo hobbyist against an outrageous patent suit from a company that claims to hold the rights to online competitions on social networks where users vote for the winner.

Le Permanent, Royal Trust, A.E. LePage and Century 21 remained outside of the MLS system for six months, distributing their listings themselves, until the board changed its «one company, one vote» membership structure to allow all salespeople the right to vote.