It's an important change, because many boards now following the TSX's
voting rules do take advantage of this loophole: in 2015, 21 directors got majority withholds, and in 16 of the cases, boards used the exemption rule to keep the director.
Last year, NBR was 6/10 on the eventual Oscar nominees, so these will likely be the movies to be paying attention to (though the 5 % first place
vote rule does throw a spanner in the works).
Not exact matches
The lawsuit says Wisconsin is violating the U.S. Supreme Court's 2000 Bush v. Gore
ruling because it doesn't have uniform standards to determine which
votes should be counted in a recount.
Now local legislatures can make such changes without explanation, and it's up to voters to try to challenge them in lawsuits, and to
do so often on an tight timetable, since courts won't want to change
voting rules close to an election.
As a
rule, Milner has said he doesn't take board seats in his later - stage investments, and rarely requires founders to hand over
voting shares when issuing company stock.
Tencent Music, however, has decided to go for a U.S. listing as Spotify is listed there and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing's (HKEX) newly introduced
rules do not allow corporate entities to benefit from weighted
voting rights for now, according to IFR.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and
do not provide the organization that holds your shares with specific
voting instructions then, under applicable
rules, the organization that holds your shares may generally
vote your shares in their discretion on «routine» matters but can not
vote on «non-routine» matters.
If you are a beneficial holder and
do not provide specific
voting instructions to your broker, under a recent
rule change the organization that holds your shares will not be authorized to
vote on the election of directors.
Because of a change in New York Stock Exchange
rules, unlike previous annual meetings, your broker will NOT be able to
vote your shares with respect to the election of directors if you have not given your broker specific instructions to
do so.
The separation, which
does not require a shareholder
vote, remains subject to market conditions, customary regulatory approvals, an affirmative
ruling from the US Internal Revenue Service, the execution of separation and intercompany agreements, and final board approval.
If you
do not provide such instructions by that time, your Shares will be
voted by the Retirement Plans Committee of the respective plan in accordance with the
rules of the applicable plan.
«The election
rules did not prohibit proxy
voting.
Vice Chancellor Strine went on to explain, however, that a corporation may in fact opt out of the default
voting — and nominating —
rules of state law, provided it
does so clearly and unambiguously:
As a result of changes adopted by the NYSE to its broker
voting rules, including changes mandated by the Dodd - Frank Act in connection with stockholder
votes on executive compensation matters, the NYSE
does not consider the election of directors (Item 1), the advisory resolution regarding named executives» compensation (Item 2), and the advisory proposal on the frequency of future advisory
votes regarding named executives» compensation (Item 3) to be routine.
Senate Finance Committee aides said they planned to make adjustments to the legislation because it probably
does not comply with the
rules for a special Senate procedure they hope to use to pass the bill with 50
votes, rather than the 60
votes typically needed to beat a filibuster.
The reconciliation bill also initially delayed but
did not repeal the so - called «Cadillac tax» on high - cost insurance plans to avoid revenue loss outside the budget window, but an amendment repealing it was adopted by an overwhelming bipartisan
vote and no Byrd
rule challenge was raised despite its deficit impact.
Once again, all the conservative
votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority»
rules the country and will be
doing so for awhile.
A university
rule that permits anyone to run for any office
does NOT exempt the person from needing to convince the majority of the membership to
vote for that person to serve as its leader.
Once again, all the conservative
votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Mitt Romney, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority»
rules the country and will be
doing so for awhile.
To all this, I say too bad; churches have to play by the
rules — all of them — whether they like them or not, and as long as they're being subsidized, they don't get a
vote about it.
Once again, all the conservative
votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Newton Leroy Gingrich, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority»
rules the country and will be
doing so for awhile.
U.S. opposition to the ICC is of a piece with its
vote a year earlier against the treaty to ban antipersonnel land - mines, its refusal to pay UN dues, its economic sanctions on allies that
do business in Cuba, and its implicit foreign policy of demanding a «superpower exemption» from international
rules.
Even more sad republicans
did not win the election putting them in govt such election win gained came via massive
voting fraud / coupled with the corrupt
ruling of an supreme court decision / awarding them victory.
Once again, all the conservative
votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Mitt Romney, Newton Leroy Gingrich, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum (exit right), in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority»
rules the country and will be
doing so for awhile.
While we all should and
do tolerate and accept each others right to worship, the majority should
rule, just as in
voting, as in democracy and in life.
The founding fathers
did intend that the state would not establish a church — they never came up with
rules disqualifying people from
voting based on their religion.
Just now, by a
vote of five to four the Supreme Court of the United States
ruled that same - sex couples may now marry in all 50 states, striking down the bans of states who have attempted
do so.
Nowhere in the Bible
do God, Jesus, or the Prophets advocate: 1) Democracy 2) consent of the governed 3) government by the people and for the people 4) the right to
vote and choose our representatives, etc. etc.THESE human rights were won by BRAVE SECULAR FORCES that tore down and broke up the POWER OF THE CHURCH to
rule our lives and oppress us.
Once again, all the conservative
votes in the country «ain't» going to help a «pro-life» presidential candidate, i.e Mitt Romney, Newton Leroy Gingrich, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum, in 2012 as the «Immoral Majority»
rules the country and will be
doing so for awhile.
In the cutthroat world of F1 teams will
do pretty much anything to gain even the tiniest advantage over each other, whether it's by pestering stewards for a rival to get a penalty, or
voting for
rule changes which benefit themselves over the greater good.
This sort of thing is always going to happen when teams are allowed to have a say in the
rules because obviously, they'll
vote against anything which doesn't benefit them.
More fun still is identifying those players who apparently didn't grasp that the
rules prohibit
voting for one's fellow countrymen.
But such approval doesn't prohibit the judges from
voting their own opinions, and Bordogna cited ISU figure skating
rule No. 3.42, which provides that ice dancing must be adaptable to a dance floor as well as a skating rink.
Don't forget this,» said Rummenigge, as Bayern were one of four parties that
voted for the abolishment of the 50 +1
rule in order to open up the league to outside investors and with the hope that fresh money would raise the level of competition in the Bundesliga for Bayern.
I think our members of Congress, who will be
voting on any proposed changes to school meal
rules this year, should take note of the fact that the overwhelming majority of people surveyed don't want school meal regulations weakened.
Mr Nkansah added: «If he doesn't know, he should check the constitution and he'll realize that minority
rules the country but they are
voted into power by the majority of Ghanaians.
The reason a «Nay»
vote is required to change the
rules this way, is because the Senator casting it is saying «No, I don't like the existing
rule».
Then, there is normally a moment of «fear»: «oh yeah, I was going to
vote for that people but now they are leading the polls, so let's take it more seriously:
do I really want them to
rule the country?
So the
rules provide for senators whose opinion has changed to motion for another
vote, whereas those whose opinion stays the same don't get to keep filing to reconsider.
Madam Faustina Nelson, a leading member of the the
ruling National Democratic Congress» (NDC) has asked Ghanaians to
vote massively for John Dramani Mahama for him to continue with the good works he's
doing for Ghana.
«I
did not drop out of this process even as many reported various
vote totals and withdrawn candidacies because I think, in this crisis, it is essential that all members of the state Legislature examine our
rules and look closely at proposals for reform and openness,» Nolan said.
A high
vote share doesn't mean much under First Past the Post electoral
rules.
In the U.S. Senate, the filibuster allows a single senator to effectively block a
vote by way of the senate
rules that allow for unlimited debate, but now, the senate
rules have somehow been modified so that to invoke filibuster you don't even need to actually have «debate» where you
do silly things like read names from the telephone book to keep the debate going.
Following the sentence, some sympathizers of the
ruling National Democratic decided to rain curses on President John Mahama and other leading members of the party for not intervening in the saga and have vowed
vote out the party if it didn't engineer the release of the Montie trio.
But the DRC has
rules and procedures, and one of them is that candidates who don't pre-interview don't get
voted on at the straw poll — no matter who they are or how popular they might be.
Wikipedia says that the filibuster in the United States Senate is a Senate
rule that allows a senator to talk as long as he
does not give up the floor, unless a special
vote is taken to stop debate.
If Russia denies the Crimeans to
vote, then the EU / USA will vilify Russia because it suppresses the opinion of the Crimeans and it shows that Russia is afraid of a
vote which will show that the Crimeans
do not want to be
ruled by Russia.
According to the ’09 change, a hearing must be held within two weeks unless the majority of
Rules members (read: Republicans)
vote not to
do so.
In the U.S. Senate, the Senate
rules apparently
do not apply to the first day of a new Senate session until the
rules are
voted in by a simple majority.
assuming Democrats are elected to those two vacancies, it would give elected Democrats 32
votes, presumably enough to form a majority or at least try to
do so by changing the Senate
rules.