It's also a crock, because
voucher programs actually save taxpayers money.
The most recent data from Louisiana and Ohio shows that
voucher programs actually have a negative impact on student achievement.
In addition, we receive some smaller financial assistance to help close the gap between the cost of tuition and what
the voucher program actually allows us to receive.
Not exact matches
JB: Florida's universal preschool policy is
actually the largest
voucher program in the nation, with about 80 percent of eligible kids participating.
But in a large - scale
program, we do not know what proportion of the treatment group would
actually use a
voucher offered to them.
Given that Florida public schools spend close to $ 17,000 per disabled student and that the McKay
program contains a roughly representative distribution of disability types, taxpayers are
actually saving quite a bit of money with special education
vouchers, and public school districts are certainly not being «financially punished.»
Unfortunately for DOJ, multiple studies showed that the
voucher program was
actually improving integration, and the agency withdrew its request for an injunction.
The DOJ claimed the
voucher program imperiled desegregation efforts but two studies showed that the
vouchers actually improved racial integration.
Looking at longitudinal studies in Milwaukee and Louisiana, she describes them in a way that will leave the impression that the results were negative for school choice: «In both cases,
programs were used primarily by black students and generally did not exacerbate segregation in public schools; however, students using
vouchers did not gain access to integrated private schools, and segregation in private schools
actually increased.»
It's interesting that there have
actually been two longitudinal studies of the Louisiana
voucher program, and Potter didn't review the other one.
A 2016 review by Dr. Clive Belfield (Teachers College, Columbia University) of the Milwaukee
voucher program by the University of Arkansas questioned the methodology of the study and concluded that there is little consideration of how
voucher programs might
actually influence criminality.
However, a recent major study of the statewide Louisiana
voucher program found that, after two years, students in the
program had
actually lost ground in both reading and math.
Only the top seven states in the list
actually have ESA,
voucher, and / or tax - credit scholarship spending that is larger than 1 percent of combined
program and public K — 12 spending in that respective state.
«
Actually, I believe it will also become the fastest - growing third - year
voucher program.»
Their board members include Dick DeVos, heir to the Amway fortune who has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars of seed money into school choice groups, and his wife Betsy DeVos, who
actually runs AFC and is known for her conservative Christian right - wing ideology and for having poured millions into promoting
voucher programs across the country.
A recent study of that
program, released in July by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute, found that students who used the
vouchers to attend private schools
actually performed worse on standardized tests than similar students who stayed in public schools.
The president claimed that the means - tested
voucher programs in Milwaukee and D.C, «didn't
actually make that much of a difference,» and added, «As a general proposition,
vouchers have not significantly improved the performance of kids that are in these poorest communities.»
Wisconsin's accountability standards for its
voucher program are
actually a bit more robust than North Carolina's.
Mr. Obama said that the means - tested
voucher programs in Milwaukee and Washington, D.C, «didn't
actually make that much of a difference,» and added, «As a general proposition,
vouchers have not significantly improved the performance of kids that are in these poorest communities.»
The study found that from 2011 - 2016, the number of students applying to the DC
voucher program increased, but the number of students
actually using a
voucher decreased.
Although the finding that shelter intake declined in association with the inception of the
voucher program, the presence of extraneous (confounding) factors associated both with time and shelter intake can not be ruled out, including migration into and out of the county (although the human population
actually increased during the study period).