Only about 20 percent of primary (K — 8) private
voucher school students attend schools that belong to networks that have more than three schools (see sidebar).
Not exact matches
Recent analysis of the widely followed
voucher experiment in Milwaukee shows that low - income minority
students who
attended private
schools scored substantially better in reading and math after four years than those who remained in public
schools.
Brinig and Garnett argue that, given their demonstrably positive impact across society, these
schools should be given a fighting chance through mechanisms like tuition tax credits or
vouchers, with public funds going to the child to enable
students to
attend an inner - city Catholic
school.
In 1951 the nation's scholarship program was opened up to qualifying
students who wanted to
attend private secondary
schools; the government also began providing for children
attending all elementary
schools a minimal supplementary aid in a form similar to the tuition
voucher plans presently under discussion in several American states.
Though he has been light on details, Trump is pushing an agenda that includes more charter
schools and a
voucher system for
students who want to
attend private
schools.
Mr. Cuomo has also voiced support for a bill, backed by the Catholic Church and advocates of
vouchers, that would offer tax credits to individuals and corporations who donate money to public
schools, or to scholarship programs that help poor and middle - class
students attend private
schools.
Now, according to a poll just released by Associated Press and the National Opinion Research Center,
vouchers that use taxpayer funds for low - income
students to
attend private
schools gathered support from 43 % of the public, with only 31 % opposed.
The size and significance of
voucher effects for African - Americans appear unchanged after controlling for the class sizes in the public and private
schools students attended.
EdNext (targeted
vouchers, government funding emphasis): A proposal has been made that would use government funds to pay the tuition of low - income
students who choose to
attend private
schools.
Though
voucher programs tend to receive more attention, more than six in ten
students attending private
school through an educational choice program are using tax - credit scholarships.
Students in both schools were offered vouchers, and nearly 50 students and their families chose to attend one of a handful of nearby private schools, most of which were religiously aff
Students in both
schools were offered
vouchers, and nearly 50
students and their families chose to attend one of a handful of nearby private schools, most of which were religiously aff
students and their families chose to
attend one of a handful of nearby private
schools, most of which were religiously affiliated.
Americans» support for using public funds to pay for
students to
attend private
schools apparently was growing even before the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision upholding the Cleveland
voucher plan, findings from this year's Phi Delta Kappa / Gallup poll on public attitudes about education suggest.
PDK (universal
vouchers, government funding emphasis): Do you favor or oppose allowing
students and parents to choose a private
school to
attend at public expense?
This year, Immaculate also began accepting the Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship, a different kind of
voucher that allows
students on Individualized Education Plans to
attend private
schools and receive a
voucher worth up to $ 20,000, depending on the severity of a child's disability.
In traditional
voucher programs, funding «follows»
students to whichever eligible
school they choose to
attend
Few topics stir up as much debate in the education sphere as steering public money in the form of
vouchers to pay for
students to
attend private
school.
When comparable samples and measuring sticks are used, the improvement in test scores for black
students from
attending a small class based on the Tennessee STAR experiment is about 50 percent larger than the gain from switching to a private
school based on the
voucher experiments in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Dayton, Ohio.
Educational researcher Gerald Bracey, author of Reading Educational Research: How to Avoid Getting Statistically Snookered, writes in Stanford magazine that «NCLB aims to shrink the public sector, transfer large sums of public money to the private sector, weaken or destroy two Democratic power bases — the teachers» unions — and provide
vouchers to let
students attend private
schools at public expense.»
In every experimental evaluation of private
school voucher programs, the
students who won the
voucher lottery but did not consistently use their
voucher to
attend private
schools have remained in the study over time as members of the treatment group, and the
students who lost the
voucher lottery but enrolled in private
school have remained in the study as members of the control group.
McKenzie Snow argues that the federal grants could allow
students to
attend the average Catholic elementary
school (the lowest - tuition private
schools) if supplemented by a state
voucher on the order of those in Indiana, North Carolina, or Ohio ($ 4000 average).
A
school voucher program can not force scholarship recipients to use a
voucher, nor can it prevent control - group
students from
attending private
schools at their own expense.
[3] Would poor
students using
vouchers to
attend private
schools do better than if they remained in their public systems?
Conversely, «if a white
student uses a LSP
voucher to
attend a
school that is more white than its surrounding community, the transfer would be reducing integration at the new
school.»
•
Vouchers «to pay the tuition of low - income
students who choose to
attend private
schools»: 37 % favor, 51 % oppose.
• Among
students using the
voucher to
attend a private elementary
school (most
students attended Catholic
schools), the estimated impact on full - time college enrollment was 8 percentage points, or roughly 31 %.
It put into place a
school voucher program for
students who were
attending schools that received the grade of F twice in a row.
On the third page of the study, the authors write: «Negative
voucher effects are not explained by the quality of public fallback options for LSP applicants: achievement levels at public
schools attended by
students lotteried out of the program are below the Louisiana average and comparable to scores in low - performing districts like New Orleans.»
In 2009 - 10, the second year of the
voucher program, 1,324 New Orleans
students attended 31 private
schools using
vouchers with a maximum value of over $ 7,000.
Paul E. Peterson speaks with Patrick Wolf of the University of Arkansas about his study finding that
students in Milwaukee who received
vouchers to
attend private
schools were 2 - 5 percentage points less likely to be accused or convicted of crimes than comparable
students who
attended public
schools.
The Milwaukee
voucher program is the largest and longest - running urban
school choice program in the U.S., established in 1990 and now serving over 22,000 low - income
students who
attend 107 private
schools using $ 6,000
vouchers toward tuition.
A study comparing the performance of
students using
vouchers to
attend private
school in Milwaukee with
students who
attend public
schools found that
students in both groups are exhibiting similar levels of growth.
Their first method analyzed information on 1,475
students (20 % of the total 7,338 sample) who had
attended schools with a
voucher for part of their education but had also been in public
schools.
In The Education Gap:
Vouchers and Urban
Schools (Brookings, 2002), we and our colleagues reported that
attending a private
school had no discernible impact, positive or negative, on the test scores of non-African-American
students participating in
school voucher programs in Washington, D.C., New York City, and Dayton, Ohio.
The net impact on taxpayers, then, is 1) the savings that come from the difference between the
voucher and the per - pupil revenue at district
schools, for those who would have
attended them in the absence of the
voucher program, minus 2) the
voucher costs for
students who would have
attended private
schools anyway.
The
voucher initiative would target
students who
attend low - performing public
schools.
Supporters of government
vouchers that would allow
students to
attend schools of their choice got some practical tips here at the Christian Coalition's annual «Road to Victory» conference.
A midrange estimate derived from this literature is that about 10 percent of
voucher - using
students from low - income families in big cities would have
attended private
schools anyway (the percentage is higher for one - year attendance and lower for more sustained attendance).
Students in
schools that failed to meet the state's standards could receive
vouchers worth about $ 4,000 each to
attend any public, private, or religious
school in Florida.
The history of the MPCP illustrates how
voucher programs can provide significant taxpayer savings when
students voluntarily choose to
attend schools that draw less on public funds than the
schools they would otherwise
attend.
Vouchers offer nothing to the 76,000
students who
attend Cleveland public
schools.
This program provides all
students in special education with a generous
voucher that they can use to
attend a private
school, eliminating the need for dissatisfied parents to sue their
school.
Offsetting such savings, however, are the
voucher expenses for those eligible
students who, in the absence of the program, would still have
attended a private
school.
I have spliced the two data sets together for the period since MPCP began and examined the trends that would have obtained without the program, under varying assumptions about the percentage of
voucher students that would have
attended private
schools anyway.
Vouchers have come to include the use of private funding as partial tuition support for low - income
students to
attend private
schools (as in Washington, D.C., San Antonio, and New York); the use of public funds to allow a small number of low - income
students to
attend private
schools (as in Milwaukee and Cleveland); or, as in the case of Florida, the provision of public funds for
students to
attend a private
school or another public
school if their current public
school has a poor aca - demic record.
The studies were conducted as a partnership with the
School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas and look at the impact of the
vouchers on
student achievement and non-cognitive skills, on racial segregation, and on
students attending nearby public
schools (competitive effects).
Minority
students who received a
school voucher to
attend private elementary
schools in 1997 were, as of 2013, 10 percent more likely to enroll in college and 35 percent more likely than their peers in public
school to obtain a bachelor's degree.
While Catholic
schools were closing, the number of charter
schools was increasing, and various states were setting up
voucher programs for low - income
students to
attend (some) private
schools.
That said, Moe's analysis does not, and can not, address the larger question of how social disparity would be distributed within each sector if all
students were given
vouchers to
attend any
school - public or private.
That legislation, which also passed the House 95 - 21 and which Gov. Jeb Bush, a Republican, was expected to sign, would impose a new set of accountability requirements, including mandating standardized tests for thousands of
voucher students attending private
schools with public money.
The Colorado Opportunity Contract Pilot Program, enacted in 2003, established a
voucher program for a limited number of low - income, low - achieving
students who had
attended schools in any of 11 poorly performing
school districts.