Not only could unregulated school
voucher systems fail to serve the students for whom they are intended, North Carolina could be looking forward to dealing with the kind of fraud and abuse of taxpayer dollars that Milwaukee, Florida, and countless other locales have faced should these bills pass with little regulatory provisions.
Not exact matches
The theory undergirding this
system is that schools in danger of
failing will improve their academic performance to avoid the political embarrassment and potential loss in revenues from having their students depart with tuition
vouchers.
Given that similar factors are at work in Florida's accountability
system, I suspect that most, if not all, of the improvements in school performance in that state's
failing schools are attributable to the state's administered accountability
system, not to the
voucher component of that program.
During his eight years in Tallahassee, the governor established a far - reaching accountability
system, including limits on social promotion in elementary school; introduced a plethora of school choice initiatives (
vouchers for the disabled,
vouchers for those in
failing schools, tax - credit funded scholarships for the needy, virtual education, and a growing number of charter schools); asked school districts to pay teachers according to merit; promoted a «Just Read» initiative; ensured parental choice among providers of preschool services; and created a highly regarded
system for tracking student achievement.
In any case, says Paul Hill, director of the Center on Reinventing Public Education at the University of Washington, it takes more than a few
vouchers or mayoral control to turn around a
failing school
system.
Fast forward to 2017: President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have championed a plan to provide federal funding for private school
voucher systems nationwide, which would funnel millions of taxpayer dollars out of public schools and into unaccountable private schools — a school reform policy that they say would provide better options for low - income students trapped in
failing schools.
When all else
fails, NEA points to the bogus «fiscal burden» of
vouchers, charging that they increase costs «by requiring taxpayers to fund two school
systems, one public and one private.»
A second
system — the first statewide
voucher system in the country, which was struck down by the Florida Supreme Court in 2006 — gave
vouchers to public school students in a «
failing school» to move to a public or private school of their choice, according to the conservative think tank, Washington Policy Center.
• Empowerment Through School Choice — The centerpiece of delivery
system reform must be comprehensive, child - centered school choice in all of its manifestations, including
vouchers, charters, online, home schooling, etc., beginning with aggressive expansion of open enrollment charter authority and voucherizing special education and students in
failing schools.
Taxpayer - funded
vouchers have helped thousands of families escape
failing public schools, but their structure limits their ability to create the kind of education market
system that Milton Friedman advocated at the birth of the school - choice movement.
Instead of cracking down on subpar schools, SB 1 locks in a
system in which students that are in private
voucher schools declared to be «chronically
failing» can continue to use taxpayer - funded
vouchers to attend these schools.
said in a statement that private school
vouchers are needed because the D.C. public school
system, «often cited as one of the worst in the country, is absolutely
failing these children.»
Also,
voucher recipients aren't always trapped in
failing public schools; in fact, some have never even tried the public
system.
We recognize that no
voucher program can save a
failing public
system.