That analysis also finds that the effect of
vouchers on student achievement is larger than the following in - school factors: exposure to violent crime at school, feeling unsafe in school, high teacher turnover, and teacher absenteeism.4
In this article, we review the empirical evidence on the impact of education
vouchers on student achievement, and briefly discuss the evidence from other forms of school choice.
Rigorous research on vouchers, tax credits and other school privatization models like charter schools shows that the effect of
vouchers on student achievement and other outcomes is highly suspect at best.
We know very little about the long - term consequences of
vouchers on student achievement.
The studies were conducted as a partnership with the School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas and look at the impact of
the vouchers on student achievement and non-cognitive skills, on racial segregation, and on students attending nearby public schools (competitive effects).
The most extreme claim in the essay, among many, is that «the effect of
vouchers on student achievement is larger than the following in - school factors: exposure to violent crime at school...» Yep, you read that correctly: selecting a private school for your child is as damaging to them as witnessing school violence.
Not exact matches
Despite these differences, the bulk of the available, high - quality evidence
on school
voucher programs suggests that they do yield positive
achievement effects for participating
students.
On the third page of the study, the authors write: «Negative
voucher effects are not explained by the quality of public fallback options for LSP applicants:
achievement levels at public schools attended by
students lotteried out of the program are below the Louisiana average and comparable to scores in low - performing districts like New Orleans.»
On the other hand, he defies proponents of charters,
vouchers, and other forms of school choice as wishful thinkers disposed to let marketplace theories trump evidence of
student achievement while also undervaluing education's civic and cultural roles.
Arizona «Ground Zero» for Koch Attack
on Public Education (The Center for Media and Democracy) Mention of HGSE Professor Marty West's research into
voucher programs in Louisiana and their impact
on student achievement.
The Commission, chaired by Dr. Paul Hill of the University of Washington, carefully reviewed the research
on the impact of school choice
on student achievement and included in its report the following statement: «The most rigorous school choice evaluations that used random assignment... found that academic gains from
vouchers were largely limited to the African - American
students in their studies.»
Patrick Wolf, who conducted the evaluation of the impact of the D.C.
voucher program
on student achievement, talks with Education Next about that study in a video available here.
Research
on the effect of existing private school
voucher programs has not shown significant
achievements for
students in those programs, the report asserts.
Vouchers have a moderately large, positive effect
on the
achievement of African - American
students, but no discernible effect
on the performance of
students of other ethnicities.
In some places, Catholic schools must participate in these, usually as a condition of receiving
students with
vouchers; in a handful of places, diocesan authorities have willingly joined in, but nobody would say there's been a great rush by Catholic schools to be compared — with charter schools, with district schools, with other private schools, even with each other —
on the basis of academic
achievement.
Information
on more than one - quarter million
students who were 4th graders in 2002 allows us to compare Spanish language and mathematics
achievement in network and stand - alone
voucher - subsidized schools.
Students who use the
voucher to enroll in private schools end up with much lower math
achievement than they would have otherwise, losing as much as 13 percentile points
on the state standardized test after two years.
We find that
vouchers have a moderately large, positive effect
on the
achievement of African - American
students, but no discernible effect
on the performance of
students of other ethnicities.
«Private school
vouchers are not an effective way to improve
student achievement,» said the White House in a statement
on March 29.
What is clear, however, is that both Catholic schools and
voucher programs for low - income families show stronger effects
on students» educational attainment than
on their
achievement as measured by standardized tests.
According to the official announcement and the executive summary of the report, school
vouchers lifted high school graduation rates but it could not be conclusively determined that it had a positive impact
on student achievement.
One should not under - estimate the impact of the DC school
voucher program
on student achievement.
Only one study, conducted by Jay Greene and Marcus Winters and focusing
on the D.C.
voucher program, found that
voucher competition had no effect
on the test scores of non-participants, while no empirical study of acceptable rigor has found that a U.S. private - school - choice program decreased the
achievement of public school
students.
Even so, our analysis provides the most complete picture to date of the early effects
on student achievement of a
voucher program operating at scale.
Going forward, our study will examine the impacts of
vouchers on high - school
students»
achievement and attainment.
That study, while reporting negative
achievement effects for participants in Ohio's largest
voucher program, also found that
students remaining in public schools performed higher
on tests, owing to program - induced competition.
This project, in partnership with the School Choice Demonstration Project at the University of Arkansas, addresses the effects of LSP
vouchers on the
achievement and non-cognitive skills of
students offered
vouchers, as well as racial segregation and the competitive effects
on students in public schools.
During his eight years in Tallahassee, the governor established a far - reaching accountability system, including limits
on social promotion in elementary school; introduced a plethora of school choice initiatives (
vouchers for the disabled,
vouchers for those in failing schools, tax - credit funded scholarships for the needy, virtual education, and a growing number of charter schools); asked school districts to pay teachers according to merit; promoted a «Just Read» initiative; ensured parental choice among providers of preschool services; and created a highly regarded system for tracking
student achievement.
The authors say that the existing research
on student achievement, while still preliminary, bodes well for
vouchers.
Chile's
voucher program has led to widespread socio - economic stratification and a decline in public school enrollment, all while making little to no impact
on student achievement.63 The program's design essentially creates three school systems: public schools attended mostly by the lowest - income
students;
voucher - subsidized private schools attended by more middle - class
students, as they can charge additional fees or tuition; and nonsubsidized private schools attended by the wealthiest
students.
• Finally, in 2015, Carnegie Mellon's Dennis Epple and colleagues conducted an international literature review and found that
vouchers had no consistent effects
on student achievement.
I have written about
voucher results from Louisiana extensively before, especially the large negative effects that the state's program, and a similar program in Ohio, have had
on the
achievement of
students using them to move to private schools.
Nation's Only Federally Funded
Voucher Program Has Negative Effect
on Student Achievement, Study Finds (The Washington Post) Associate Professor Martin West weighs in
on new research behind
voucher programs and their impact
on students» performance.
On vouchers, the legislation creates a new Local Academic Flexible Grant to help states and school districts develop in - school or after - school initiatives for boosting student achievement based on local need
On vouchers, the legislation creates a new Local Academic Flexible Grant to help states and school districts develop in - school or after - school initiatives for boosting
student achievement based
on local need
on local needs.
A 2011 meta - analysis study of more than 30 studies (including the oft - cited 2011 Friedman Foundation Report) by the Center for Education Policy found that «the empirical evidence
on vouchers is inconclusive and further found that any gains in
student achievement are modest if they exist at all» (amicus brief, Schwartz v. López, 2016).
«CAP chose to ignore the most recent research
on the academic performance of
voucher programs, including the recently released study showing improved academic
achievement for Louisiana Scholarship Program
students.
The National Bureau for Economic Research (NBER) released in December 2015 the first nationally recognized random assignment study to ever demonstrate that a school
voucher program — LSP — had a negative effect
on student achievement in its first year.
The use of a
voucher had no statistically significant impact
on overall
student achievement in math or reading.
The most rigorous and comprehensive research
on vouchers finds that they negatively affect
student achievement, but the impact of a nationwide
voucher initiative would be particularly devastating in rural communities and small towns where there are not enough
students to sustain multiple schools at each grade span.
The state places few requirements
on private
voucher schools to account for how the taxpayer dollars are used to educate
students, demonstrate
achievement of the
students who receive the aid or any transparency to assure the funds are used as intended.
State Superintendent Tony Evers said based
on voucher student data among the three programs, «Clearly,
student achievement needs to improve.»
Public School Response to Special Education
Vouchers: The Impact of Florida's McKay Scholarship Program
on Disability Diagnosis and
Student Achievement in Public Schools
The most recent data from Louisiana and Ohio shows that
voucher programs actually have a negative impact
on student achievement.
Collecting and disseminating polling data and research findings from respected national and local organizations that shows the ineffectiveness of
vouchers and
voucher - like policies
on student achievement.
Data from a meta - analysis of the participant effects of private school
vouchers illustrates that the effect of
vouchers on participating
students» academic
achievement in both reading and math tends to start out neutral or negative in year one and trends to positive by years two or three of the program.
Humphries said in an interview that Evers was too focused
on objecting to the expansion of private
voucher and independent charter schools and not focused enough
on raising
student achievement and closing the gap in academic
achievement between white and black
students.
Combatants
on both sides of that fight could claim a measure of validation from the new research: Advocates of school choice who argue that it isn't fair to judge
voucher programs based
on test results from a
student's first year in private school, given that it takes children time to adjust to a new environment, and critics who say
vouchers drain funds from public schools without improving
student achievement.
On top of that, early evidence on student achievement also points to negative outcomes for families that took advantage of the voucher
On top of that, early evidence
on student achievement also points to negative outcomes for families that took advantage of the voucher
on student achievement also points to negative outcomes for families that took advantage of the
vouchers.
The
voucher program had a negative impact
on students» academic
achievement in its first two years.
The study found that the
voucher program had a negative effect
on student achievement in both reading and math after its first two years.