For example, if a science journalist presents the evolution
vs. intelligent design debate on equal terms, he has objectively indicated that there is a debate.
In the argument of evolution
vs. intelligent design there is this sad truth that it seems we are de-evolving more then anything.
Not exact matches
Do not take my word for it; read the opinion issued in the 2005 Kitzmiller et al.
vs. Dover School Board case, which held that «
intelligent design is not science and «can not uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents.»»
Reminds me of Wendy Wright and her biggest «talking point» while debating Richard Dawkins on the subject of
intelligent design vs. evolution.