Tax expenditures
vs. social programs are grouped separately in the table and color - coded.
[6] The columns in the table address: a) the vehicle by which funding is delivered (e.g., tax expenditure
vs. social program); b) the particulars of that funding vehicle (e.g., payments to individuals vs. program providers or states); c) the dollar value of the benefit to a family; d) whether the tax benefits are refundable (provide refunds to low income families in excess of their tax liability); e) whether the benefits are progressive (inverse to family income); f) the total annual program expenditure that is conditional on children (e.g., spending on housing vouchers that goes to families without children is excluded); and g) the estimated portion of the total expenditure that goes to children under five years of age.
Not exact matches
In one, researchers examined how SEL intervention
programs (such as
social skills training, parent training with home visits, peer coaching, reading tutoring, and classroom
social - emotional curricula) for kindergarten students impacted their adult lives, and found that these
programs led to 10 % (59 %
vs. 69 % for the control group) fewer psychological, behavioral, or substance abuse problems at the age of 25 (Dodge et al., 2014).
Ultimately, in an impasse, each side fears losing something: In disputes over Gun Control, it is losing more innocent lives
vs. losing personal safety and protection; in disputes over Immigration Reform, it is losing talented people and necessary
social contributions of immigrants
vs. losing potential American jobs; in disputes over the Debt Ceiling / Fiscal Cliff, it is losing on - going
social programs vs. losing tax money to excessive interest payments; and, in disputes over Certification for Mediators, it is losing quality control for consumers
vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regulators.
An evaluation of the long - term impact of the Chicago Child - Parent Centers, for example, showed that children attending the
program for a full day scored better on measures of
social - emotional development, math and reading skills, and physical health than similar children attending the
program part day.Arthur Reynolds et al. «Association of a Full - Day
vs. Part - Day Preschool Intervention with School Readiness, Attendance, and Parent Involvement,» JAMA 312, no. 20 (2014): 2126 — 2134.