Sentences with phrase «wages than the other clubs»

Not exact matches

He is not a big earner at the club on # 70,000 aweek, But he shows more guts and desire for the shirt he wears than the others who earn twice his wages!

Other than in China, no sensible club would offer him the wages anywhere near what he had been demanding from Arsenal.

Lose their pull power?most spanish speaking south american players dream of playing for either Barcelona or Real Madrid they even accept lower wages from these clubs than they would get from other clubs in Europe!

As we have seen many times in the past, the stumbling block on many of our outgoing players has been the fact that other clubs will not match the massive wages that they have been given by Arsenal, and we all know that Walcott is on a massive 110,000 a week, which is more than most club's highest earners get.

lewa and Benz r out, griezmann, lukaku, auba and dybala r young and will have d cash pits of Europe chasing them... which means astronomical transfer fees / wage (we'll definitely lose in d bidding war)... huguain is a viable option but with a transfer fee of 55m and 200k wages for a 29 year old????... BONKERS!!!!! I don't know about u but I feel we shld do everytin legal / illegal to get vardy... by 2 - 3 years time, others strikers will have surfaced but for now there's a limited pool and d richest club r d sharks... i would like any of d young strikers but it doesn't mean we shld pay 40m more than their market value like its an auction!!!!

That is unless they agree to buy the right quality players and pay wages similar to what obtains at clubs such as Man U, Chelsea, Man City, Barca, Juve, etc. the fans should subsequently direct their anger and frustration at the Board than any other person.

Whatever it takes could mean a lot more than we previously thought, though, as the Daily Mail is reporting that Premier League rules on wages and the limit of how much they can rise from one season to the next will almost certainly force Arsene Wenger to sell at least two of the club's other big earners in order to offer Alexis and Ozil the wages they want.

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

In the past when wages were a lot lower than the ridicules levels they are now the player kept the gate receipts and other sponsorship monies as a reward for his long loyal service to the club.

Good article with plenty of variations each way.To my mind AFC as a club should have been tying Sánchez down 2 years ago, and Ozil should have been included at the same time.We could see how good they were and that clubs with more ambition and forward thinking than us (NOTE - Wenger and the Board you f *** ing TWATS) would gladly offer them better terms financially.These 2 are as good as we could possibly have and we have allowed this situation to happen.Sure Sanchez has gone for the wages but can you blame him?If he was tied down on a contract like he should have been then it would be us calling the shots and not Sánchez and his agent.So the answer is NO I'm more angry with the Board and Management than the player who will soon be playing under the most hated manager of all time.They deserve each other.

That # 7 million is only from TV money, clubs can increase wages by more than that if they can show they made that money from other revenues other than TV money.

Sanchez may also realize that he may not win more, have more respect and support from fans or earn higher wages at other clubs than at Arsenal.

Also Ozil has probably come to the conclusion that clubs other than Arsenal are not clamoring for his signature and certainly not offering the wages Arsenal are!

But that will not last at all, the players will soon think they are better than the club especially if there are no trophies, and even if there are trophies, wages and interest from other clubs will become a problem.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

Chelsea, Bayern Munich and Paris Saint - German are stated to be three clubs other than United who could afford the transfer fee and the players wages.

However, if any other than a top six club comes in, he's not going to get the sort of wages he's after from anywhere else as the Hammers wage structure is on a level with most others.