Results indicate self - reported physical health difficulties were significantly reduced in the PE and PE / CR conditions compared to
the waitlist condition.
Approximately 50 % of youth in both active treatments were diagnosis free and were judged to be much or very much improved at posttreatment, compared to 0 % in
the waitlist condition.
Families were allocated to either the intervention or
waitlist condition.
In the school study, adolescents were randomised to either the ACT Experiential Program or an enhanced
waitlist condition.
This compared a group therapy program for adolescents with mild to moderate depression to an enhanced
waitlist condition who received support and monitoring.
No difference was detected between the active treatment and
waitlist conditions.
Not exact matches
After asking the rep about the
waitlist, she informed me that it's based on returns, so if someone returns the size you want in new
condition, they'll let me know, otherwise you're out of luck.
On consent, caregivers can enter either of two
conditions: the intervention group or the control group, which is
waitlisted.
There was no statistical difference in dropout rate by
condition (CBCT, n = 6 [30 %];
waitlist, n = 3 [15 %]; P =.26).
Limitations include small sample size, lack of follow - up of
waitlist control
condition, relying on self - reporting measures to determine success, and generalizability to other ethnic populations.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3
conditions: Cognitive - Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT)[now called Interpersonal Therapy for Depressed Adolescents (IPT - A)-RSB-, or
waitlist (WL).
The treatment
conditions and
waitlist lasted for a 12 - week period, at which time the post-treatment assessment was conducted.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of three
conditions: Adolescent - and - Parent, Adolescent - Only (CWD - A), and
Waitlist.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Participants were randomized, by pairs, into the Individual Family Psychoeducation (IFP, otherwise known as Individual Family - Psychoeducational Psychotherapy (PEP)-RRB- plus treatment as usual (IFP + TAU, n = 10)
condition, or into a
waitlist - control
condition plus TAU (WLC + TAU, n = 10) Measures included the Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes — Child and Parent Forms; the Children's Depression Rating Scale — Revised (CDRS - R) and Mania Rating Scale (MRS) in order to assess severity of mood impairment; and Mood Severity Index (MSI), which measured overall mood severity.
In Study 1 (2001 — 2006), [Gross, et al. (2009)-RSB- the day care centers were matched on size, racial / ethnic composition, percent single parent households, and median income before randomizing them to
waitlist control or intervention
conditions.
Results indicated that the active treatment
condition produced significant change in the dependent variables in contrast to the
waitlist control
condition.
This report describes the outcomes of a behaviorally based parenting intervention for parents with infants and toddlers, using an experimental design with random allocation of participants to either intervention or enhanced
waitlist — control
conditions.
Results indicate that parents participating in ACT reported statistically significant declines in the use of harsh verbal and physical discipline compared to parents in the
waitlist control
condition.
Preschools were randomized into intervention and
waitlist control
conditions.
Although there were improvements in both
conditions over time for parent - reported child behavior and teacher - reported social competence, compared to the
waitlist group, TIK parents reported a significantly greater reduction in number of behavior problems.
A repeated measures cluster randomized group design methodology was employed with three
conditions (TIK, Triple P - Positive Parenting Program - Level 4 (Level 4 Triple P), and
waitlist control).