See all
the waiver plans submitted to the department to date.
Not exact matches
Under the bill, introduced late last week, the top 20 percent of the state's highest performing school districts would be allowed to
submit their current evaluation
plans along with a request for a
waiver to the Department of Education.
That's the picture that emerged from an Education Week analysis of
waiver proposals
submitted last month to the U.S. Department of Education by 11 states, whose
plans offer insight into what the next generation of state - led accountability looks like.
To get one of the federal
waivers, states had to
submit plans that included adopting curriculum standards geared toward college and career readiness, developing teacher evaluation systems that incorporated student testing data and tracking and narrowing achievement gaps between groups of students.
Indeed, RttT competition proved so politically successful the Department of Education built on it by allowing all states to seek a
waiver of most NCLB requirements by
submitting RttT - like reform
plans, including test - based teacher evaluations and the setting of standards similar to the Common Core State Standards.
New Hampshire, the first state in the nation to move toward awarding credit for competency rather than seat time, is
planning to
submit a
plan for what it calls Accountability 3.0 when it applies for renewal of its federal
waiver this summer.
To date, two states (New Hampshire and New York) have
submitted plans to the U.S. Dept. of Education that included
waiver requests, and Florida «wrote its accountability
plan in such a way that critics say it skirts the law.»
The state could still seek
waivers from changes that board members don't like — but only after a
plan is
submitted.
Additionally, policy experts «note that U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has approved two
plans — Connecticut and Tennessee — that are out of compliance with federal law but were
submitted without
waiver requests.»
The rules requiring
waiver states to
submit plans for providing poor and minority children with high - quality teachers was unworkable because it doesn't address the supply problem at the heart of the teacher quality issues facing American public education; the fact that state education departments would have to battle with teachers» union affiliates, suburban districts, and the middle - class white families those districts serve made the entire concept a non-starter.
The administration has also ignored red flags raised by peer review panels it has put in place to vet the
submitted proposals — including concerns that states didn't present their proposals to American Indian tribes as required under both the
waiver process (as well as under federal and state laws), and that D.C.'s
plan for implementing Common Core reading and math standards was not «realistic and of high quality».
New York is one state that stood out in the
waiver application process for
submitting detailed and comprehensive information about its
plans to teach English language learner students in both its move to college - and career - ready standards and its efforts to improve leadership and instruction.
Superintendents in D.C. to Talk District
Waiver With Duncan Superintendents representing a coalition of 10 California school districts, including LAUSD, are scheduled to meet with U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan today to make a personal pitch for a district waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind, which they plan to formally submit next
Waiver With Duncan Superintendents representing a coalition of 10 California school districts, including LAUSD, are scheduled to meet with U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan today to make a personal pitch for a district
waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind, which they plan to formally submit next
waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind, which they
plan to formally
submit next week.
President Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan have repeatedly attacked the law, going so far as to grant
waivers from the law to states who
submit alternative accountability
plans.
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn asked for the
waiver,
submitting an alternative
plan to improve student achievement.
Today, changes to federal accountability policy and the state
plans that have been
submitted for compliance purposes herald a national shift toward the work the CORE districts have been doing since their
waiver was granted.
In its consolidated state
plan submitted to the U.S. Department of Education on September 18, New York State Department of Education (NYSED) formally requested a
waiver of two statutory requirements of Title I, Part A of ESSA which are critical to ensuring all students have equal access to a quality education.
The CORE districts, which include Los Angeles and San Francisco,
submitted a
waiver plan that reflects their commitment to preparing educators to effectively implement the Common Core State Standards; evaluating educators based, in part, on student outcomes; and taking a broader approach to accountability that encompasses academic preparedness, social and emotional learning, and school climate and culture.
If so, it would need to act quickly; the first set of states to
submit waiver plans will be notified by mid-January about the status of their applications.
The department has indicated it will accept and review NCLB
waiver applications on a rolling basis throughout this school year, giving Texas and the other holdout states plenty of time to develop and
submit waiver plans if they so choose.
The
waiver application state officials
submitted in November reads both like a primer on Indiana's efforts to overhaul education, and like a game
plan for big changes to state education policy that are still to come, including a more aggressive timeline for state intervention in failing schools.
DPI is accepting feedback until Feb. 3 and
plans to
submit its
waiver application by Feb. 21.