We had no one yesterday even sanogo would have done better than sanchez did there and as for
walcot well I will excuse him.
Not exact matches
Champions league clashes coming, we need
walcot there, with ozil, sanchez,
walcot, and giroud we can win even CL if theres a
good day and a bit of miracle,
Sanchez and Ox are far more effective on the flanks than
Walcot, they are both
better with the ball at their feet.
Gibbs hasn't got the confidence to pass the ball forward, he gets to pass back to often and is not
good at defending Monreal is a class act so we need to add there Ramsey is not a wide player, why Wenger doesn't play his strongest first then make the 2subs in 65 min and
Walcot should have started as Ramsey is
better in Midfield.
The ox this year luks a different player.he is hungry and i do nt think it will be gud for us to bench him.it can affect his morale or even make his drive get lost
walcot should be a
better impact sub only reason he picks up late is his attitude.
I thought he was goin 2core 3mo until he (makeshift striker) was taken off n the first choice came on 2successfully complete his 8games with out a score by the way
walcot had a
good number of shorts on target as
well MOTM.
I wonder if we had
Walcot and Ramsey playing with Sancez at his sharpest
best, we can be very very dangerous.
He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and
Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very
well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.
Would you say
Walcot or OX are
better than Perez when it comes to that?
walcot and wilshere have shown desire to play and
well did dey play in their cameos!
«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me
walcot is a
better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games,
good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.
Obviously
Walcot still has some supporters on here, though when you actually go to the ground and ask those there you rarely find one who thinks him
good enough for us.
Vela is far
better than
walcot n the ox only that he was never given the time like these 2 in his prefered position (striker) otherwise those few moments he got t in carling cup the boy delivered
Walcot is not
better than Sanchez and once Ox is able to add goals to his game, both him and Sanchez will be benching Theo for years to come.
How come now, all are hoping
Walcot plays
well with England, when rubbishing him before.
walcot is a
good player for me.idk why is always in bench.
i rate him highly, he is a box to box player but can play as a cover for Ozil and can give a
better balance to the team than
walcot when he plays in the left wing which is not either his preferred place nor his natural one.
Yo forget that players like Sanchez and Ox they are very
good with the ball but too much dribbles unlike
Walcot who can position himself in danger areas with his pass he is always in the neck of the opposition defenders.
That was the game plan, defend
well and try to drop the ball behind their high line for
Walcot to chase.
Well, personally I did not view
Walcot as a striker.
Yes there is no WC striker but lets have faith atleast till Jan, Alexis has goals in him, im pretty sure welbeck is wanting to prove something and
walcot has a
better effect on the RW.
See we need a
good Winger cos
walcot faded off in the second half a
good CF and a
good CB, this thing hurts so much, something you love so dearly isn't giving you any smile at all, United, Liv, city will look at there club and smile, but we!
Walcott is
better than that French Thomas Lamar in attack, but here we are trying to sell
walcot who scored 19 goals last season and bring a 92 million pound lefty who only knows how to shoot d ball.
walcot was
good yesterday... but he needs to do more he is taller than sanchez but sanchez can win the ball in the air more than theo does..
Its hard for Ozil also as he has formed
good partner ship with Alexis and
Walcot and now both are not playing.
sanchez had more short on target than any other player on the pitch and he came on when?that is to show you we need a
better striker jot giroud or
walcot.and please
walcot should stop thinking he is messi he was on the pitch for 35 mins yet noting to show for it.
Its
good to see
Walcot back.
Walcot is the only player who makes it difficult to renew his contract and he is not even our
best player.
If i was Wenger, I would have sold
Walcot to liverpool for 30m and buy pedro from baca to compete with the OX on the wing and fill in for sanchez when he needs to rest... IMO Pedro is a far
better and sharper ball player than
Walcot and has a
better Work ethics.
for example look at ramsey and ox for example if injury had let
walcot play some games in the past few years as ramsey and ox i tell you he would be miles off
better..
Wenger will only attempt to sign Mahrez only if he gets a
good offer for
Walcot.
OG can scores goals but not
good enough to our playing style especially when we want our super players like Sanchez and Ozil to control the pitch,
Walcot always grantees that to the team, he may score less but contributes a lot to the team.
Why not sell all this injury prone players, like
Walcot, per, jack.gibbs, even ox, we shouldn't be scared to let go in as much as we bring in
better replacement!
I think Giroud has
better sense of positioning than Welb in the middle and Welbeck can use his pace
better from the wing.Both of those players are not top class players but with a aquad of sanchex,
Walcot, Chambo the goals can be shared.
Sometimes in some games it's glaring we need a winger or striker who is
good at running in behind defenders and
Walcot is
good at that... but all of a sudden Arsene would bring in Welbeck instead.
but am happy he left iwobi on whom for me is
better than ox and
walcot combined.
i can not understand some guys are so negative imagine we get vardy at 25 mill and sell walcott at 20 or even 15 isnt that a goood deal????
walcot is at 140k / week Vardy might get the same still we are much
better off with vardy than
walcot
because no competition for spot, if you have two
good players in one position, d one playing will b fully awaere that if he doesn't perform to expectation, there is another
good guy waiting to topple him, hence d one playing is contious of DAT, then why allow contracts to linger on, get rid of unproductive players who ate on free salaries,
walcot, iwobi, mattasarka, and buy players you can use, end carzola contract and channel d money elsewhere, too many leakages in d system, y waisting money for noting, all these is asene fault, he is the coach.
I would be happy and satisfied if we get Vidal as he is a work hose who together with Le Coq will get the
best out of Ozil and Sanchez.would love to see the striker signed but not sure with wenger's plan on
walcot as far as CF position is concerned.
Sign Def mid and leave Metersacker on the bench he is not
good enough to be in any of then top teams in Europe only Arsenal where we accommodate shit players.Arteta, flamini, Bendtner, Scuilachi, Santos, diaby, Ramsey, sanogo, fabiansky, park, Wilshere,
Walcot, the list goes on.
lets not cry over Rosicky he wouldnt be in starting 11 anyway firstly lets hope we do nt face more injuries to key players secondly i think AW should realize that Ramsey is a
better goal scorer that
Walcot and Campbel and physically stronger.
Sanchez: I think he's unreplaceable - Ox,
Walcot etc. would do a
good job, but I'll admit any replacement isn't going to give us quite as much.
Thank God
walcot and gnabry who in my opinion is way
better and have all round play than the ox.
with
Walcot coming back as
well im just licking my lips with the pace and quality we have in the team.
Welbeck,
Walcot and Sanchez will be
good for our forward line!
Walcot is playing
good, I'll tell you why.
Walcot is far more
better than welbeck.
The
best we could get right now to do that are Perez — Sanchez —
Walcot and Ozil.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ozil, sanchez,
walcot, Ramsey, wilshere or any other arsenal player left us for another team with a
better chance of wining major trophies.
forget about him.just watch the german kids in conf cup.most of those kids r actually far
better than our
walcot ox ramsey wilshire (obviously)