Sentences with phrase «walcot well»

We had no one yesterday even sanogo would have done better than sanchez did there and as for walcot well I will excuse him.

Not exact matches

Champions league clashes coming, we need walcot there, with ozil, sanchez, walcot, and giroud we can win even CL if theres a good day and a bit of miracle,
Sanchez and Ox are far more effective on the flanks than Walcot, they are both better with the ball at their feet.
Gibbs hasn't got the confidence to pass the ball forward, he gets to pass back to often and is not good at defending Monreal is a class act so we need to add there Ramsey is not a wide player, why Wenger doesn't play his strongest first then make the 2subs in 65 min and Walcot should have started as Ramsey is better in Midfield.
The ox this year luks a different player.he is hungry and i do nt think it will be gud for us to bench him.it can affect his morale or even make his drive get lost walcot should be a better impact sub only reason he picks up late is his attitude.
I thought he was goin 2core 3mo until he (makeshift striker) was taken off n the first choice came on 2successfully complete his 8games with out a score by the way walcot had a good number of shorts on target as well MOTM.
I wonder if we had Walcot and Ramsey playing with Sancez at his sharpest best, we can be very very dangerous.
He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.
Would you say Walcot or OX are better than Perez when it comes to that?
walcot and wilshere have shown desire to play and well did dey play in their cameos!
«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me walcot is a better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games, good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.
Obviously Walcot still has some supporters on here, though when you actually go to the ground and ask those there you rarely find one who thinks him good enough for us.
Vela is far better than walcot n the ox only that he was never given the time like these 2 in his prefered position (striker) otherwise those few moments he got t in carling cup the boy delivered
Walcot is not better than Sanchez and once Ox is able to add goals to his game, both him and Sanchez will be benching Theo for years to come.
How come now, all are hoping Walcot plays well with England, when rubbishing him before.
walcot is a good player for me.idk why is always in bench.
i rate him highly, he is a box to box player but can play as a cover for Ozil and can give a better balance to the team than walcot when he plays in the left wing which is not either his preferred place nor his natural one.
Yo forget that players like Sanchez and Ox they are very good with the ball but too much dribbles unlike Walcot who can position himself in danger areas with his pass he is always in the neck of the opposition defenders.
That was the game plan, defend well and try to drop the ball behind their high line for Walcot to chase.
Well, personally I did not view Walcot as a striker.
Yes there is no WC striker but lets have faith atleast till Jan, Alexis has goals in him, im pretty sure welbeck is wanting to prove something and walcot has a better effect on the RW.
See we need a good Winger cos walcot faded off in the second half a good CF and a good CB, this thing hurts so much, something you love so dearly isn't giving you any smile at all, United, Liv, city will look at there club and smile, but we!
Walcott is better than that French Thomas Lamar in attack, but here we are trying to sell walcot who scored 19 goals last season and bring a 92 million pound lefty who only knows how to shoot d ball.
walcot was good yesterday... but he needs to do more he is taller than sanchez but sanchez can win the ball in the air more than theo does..
Its hard for Ozil also as he has formed good partner ship with Alexis and Walcot and now both are not playing.
sanchez had more short on target than any other player on the pitch and he came on when?that is to show you we need a better striker jot giroud or walcot.and please walcot should stop thinking he is messi he was on the pitch for 35 mins yet noting to show for it.
Its good to see Walcot back.
Walcot is the only player who makes it difficult to renew his contract and he is not even our best player.
If i was Wenger, I would have sold Walcot to liverpool for 30m and buy pedro from baca to compete with the OX on the wing and fill in for sanchez when he needs to rest... IMO Pedro is a far better and sharper ball player than Walcot and has a better Work ethics.
for example look at ramsey and ox for example if injury had let walcot play some games in the past few years as ramsey and ox i tell you he would be miles off better..
Wenger will only attempt to sign Mahrez only if he gets a good offer for Walcot.
OG can scores goals but not good enough to our playing style especially when we want our super players like Sanchez and Ozil to control the pitch, Walcot always grantees that to the team, he may score less but contributes a lot to the team.
Why not sell all this injury prone players, like Walcot, per, jack.gibbs, even ox, we shouldn't be scared to let go in as much as we bring in better replacement!
I think Giroud has better sense of positioning than Welb in the middle and Welbeck can use his pace better from the wing.Both of those players are not top class players but with a aquad of sanchex, Walcot, Chambo the goals can be shared.
Sometimes in some games it's glaring we need a winger or striker who is good at running in behind defenders and Walcot is good at that... but all of a sudden Arsene would bring in Welbeck instead.
but am happy he left iwobi on whom for me is better than ox and walcot combined.
i can not understand some guys are so negative imagine we get vardy at 25 mill and sell walcott at 20 or even 15 isnt that a goood deal???? walcot is at 140k / week Vardy might get the same still we are much better off with vardy than walcot
because no competition for spot, if you have two good players in one position, d one playing will b fully awaere that if he doesn't perform to expectation, there is another good guy waiting to topple him, hence d one playing is contious of DAT, then why allow contracts to linger on, get rid of unproductive players who ate on free salaries, walcot, iwobi, mattasarka, and buy players you can use, end carzola contract and channel d money elsewhere, too many leakages in d system, y waisting money for noting, all these is asene fault, he is the coach.
I would be happy and satisfied if we get Vidal as he is a work hose who together with Le Coq will get the best out of Ozil and Sanchez.would love to see the striker signed but not sure with wenger's plan on walcot as far as CF position is concerned.
Sign Def mid and leave Metersacker on the bench he is not good enough to be in any of then top teams in Europe only Arsenal where we accommodate shit players.Arteta, flamini, Bendtner, Scuilachi, Santos, diaby, Ramsey, sanogo, fabiansky, park, Wilshere, Walcot, the list goes on.
lets not cry over Rosicky he wouldnt be in starting 11 anyway firstly lets hope we do nt face more injuries to key players secondly i think AW should realize that Ramsey is a better goal scorer that Walcot and Campbel and physically stronger.
Sanchez: I think he's unreplaceable - Ox, Walcot etc. would do a good job, but I'll admit any replacement isn't going to give us quite as much.
Thank God walcot and gnabry who in my opinion is way better and have all round play than the ox.
with Walcot coming back as well im just licking my lips with the pace and quality we have in the team.
Welbeck, Walcot and Sanchez will be good for our forward line!
Walcot is playing good, I'll tell you why.
Walcot is far more better than welbeck.
The best we could get right now to do that are Perez — Sanchez — Walcot and Ozil.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ozil, sanchez, walcot, Ramsey, wilshere or any other arsenal player left us for another team with a better chance of wining major trophies.
forget about him.just watch the german kids in conf cup.most of those kids r actually far better than our walcot ox ramsey wilshire (obviously)
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z