Sentences with phrase «wall of separation»

There was this middle or dividing wall of separation.

The famous phrase «wall of separation of church and state» today enjoys the status of legal precedent, but here's a curious fact.

-- a story about how adults build walls of separation, that children can easily bring down through their love and innocence — «for even the toughest walls shall not stand strong when faced with a child's innocence.»

Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and drew lines of distinction and erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged.

Thomas Jefferson was very concerned to keep a strong wall of separation between church and state.

For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation,

is stunning, open, kind, and beyond any doctrinal wall of separation.

What Jefferson defined, rather extravagantly, as «the absolute wall of separation between church and state» has been a creative but also dangerous characteristic of our national culture.

No true wall of separation is possible.

The metaphorical wall of separation of church and state (which is only a metaphor, although we sometimes pretend is a part of our constitutional law) seeks to capture this idea: there is the sphere of religion and the sphere of the state, and a mighty wall protecting each from the other.

Whereas Westerners have done so in a context in which philosophy and religion are considered quite distinct, Buddhists have lived with them in a context where no such walls of separation existed.

His assertions that he was «against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools» and that «I do not speak for my church on public matters and the church does not speak for me» were enough to convince the Century that his election did not pose a serious threat to the sacred wall of separation.

He recently walked the Israeli wall of separation, and tweets at @markthomasinfo.

Today is the day when they believe that the dividing wall of separation between men and women and gods and goddesses is the thinnest.

Thankfully, in the U.S., we have a strong wall of separation between church and state (mostly to the credit of JM & TJ); and thankfully, the more the religious extremists push against the wall, the more the wall stands firm, the more the law is considered and more and more it is applied throughout civic law.

NP said: Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and drew lines of distinction and erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged.

Thankfully, in the U.S., we have a strong wall of separation between church and state (mostly top the credit of JM & TJ); and thankfully, the more the religious extremists push against the wall, the more the wall stands firm, the more the law is considered and more and more it is applied throughout civic law.

For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity.

I wonder how many know that he - including, if I remember right, on the day after he wrote the letter containing the famous «wall of separation» phrase - attended church services at the US Capitol.

When it comes to the courts, our narrative would begin in the mid-twentieth century when the American judiciary was guided by an interpretation of the First Amendment that posited a «wall of separation» between «church and state.»

Washington (CNN)- Thomas Jefferson famously wrote about the wall of separation between church and state.

It seems some Christians are great complainers of persecution here in the U.S., and obviously paranoid and untrusting of the wall of separation — even predicting their own future persecution:

If the «wall of separation» is lowered, we are told, our schools may be returned to the days of prayers prescribed by state legislatures; evolution may be banished from the classroom and replaced by «creation science»; and religious minorities may be at the mercy of intolerant majorities.

Christians are still the dominant religion, the wall of separation is still in place and, as Doc pointed out below, for countries where gay marriage is already legal, «NONE of those countries has a church been mandated to perform ceremonies that run counter to their doctrine.»

Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion to another... in the words of Jefferson, the [First Amendment] clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect «a wall of separation between church and State»... That wall must be kept high and impregnable.

Admittedly, neither of these candidates agrees with the famous metaphor of Thomas Jefferson famous metaphor of a «wall of separation between church and state» but does either see a line of demarcation of any sort - a picket fence, perhaps - between «what is Caesar's» and «what is God's»?

So those Christians who are so eager to break down the wall of separation between church and state would be well - adivsed to rethink their positions.

Almost a century and a half later, in Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Supreme Court officially adopted Jefferson's «wall of separation» as the bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment.

The wall of separation was breached only when Catholics sought, in effect, school vouchers for paro?chial schools to escape Protestant indoctrination in public schools.

If the wall of separation was so out of step with American beliefs, why has it become so widely accepted over the years?

As Hamburger skillfully shows, Jefferson's wall of separation was shockingly radical in the early 1800s.

In Reynolds v. United States (1878), a case rejecting a claim that it was unconstitutional to prosecute Mormons for polygamy, the Supreme Court accepted Jefferson's «wall of separation» letter as the «authoritative» interpretation of the First Amendment.

Although the Court has not rejected the wall of separation, it has lowered the wall fairly dramatically, moving steadily away from the pernicious view that separation requires discrimination against religion.

Jefferson's famous «Wall of Separation between Church and State» has been used to prevent the influence of religious belief on public policy.

Jefferson's letter in response argued for a very different concept - a «wall of separation between Church & State» - that, according to him, was enshrined in the First Amendment.

I think the readership here is primarily U.S. I'll trash anyone who pushes too hard on the wall of separation with their beliefs.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, «I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.

Some continue to believe, mistakenly, that our constitutional «wall of separation» between church and state prohibits serious study of religion in public schools.

Unfortunately though, when the fundies try to push the wall of separation too hard, it must be defended.

Once one recognizes that the wall of separation leaks, and leaks badly, the case for neutrality disappears.

A Wall of Separation is supposed to protect us from all religious infringement upon our school's teachings of science to find real truth and knowledge.

Third: We put our trust in our elected officials to maintain the wall of separation, to prevent religion's ever reaching grasp from tainting the consideration of new laws, as well as research designed to help many!