Sentences with phrase «wall of separation between»

But while you would create a wall of separation between your personal assets and real estate holdings, a liability issue with one property could take down your entire portfolio.

That famous phrase: «a Wall of Separation between church and state», generated by Roger Williams, resuscitated by Justice Black and regurgitated by Rick Santorum, has assumed considerable political importance in the US over the past hundred years but is poorly understood.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between church and State.

The Supreme Court justices recognized a wall of separation between religion and public education in the first decisions with which they entered the field directly after World War II.

Even the phrase «wall of separation between church and state» was coined by Roger Williams (not Jefferson) as a responce to the Puritan's theocracy.

«Believing... that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.»

«The First Amendment never intended to separate Christian principles from government, he declares, pointing out that the phrase «wall of separation between church and state» appears not in the Constitution but in Jefferson's letter to Danbury Baptists in 1801.

Whereas the fundamentalists and integralists want to unite the spiritual power and the temporal power, Francis wants to erect a wall of separation between the two.

Thankfully, in the U.S., we have a strong wall of separation between church and state (mostly top the credit of JM & TJ); and thankfully, the more the religious extremists push against the wall, the more the wall stands firm, the more the law is considered and more and more it is applied throughout civic law.

To appreciate their fear of the consequences of too high a wall of separation between church and state, something vigorously supported by all too many secular and religious Jews?

Like Thomas Jefferson, who famously called for a «wall of separation between church and state,» Holmes believed that personal beliefs had no place in judicial decisions.

Erecting the «wall of separation between church and state,» therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.

These far more contentious words - «a wall of separation between church and state» - lie at the heart of the ongoing debate between those who see America as a «Christian Nation» and those who see it as a secular republic, a debate that is hotter than a Washington Fourth of July.

A whole contingent of evangelical Joshuas has arrived on the scene, hoping to bring down the wall of separation between church and state.

Even the hallowed phrase that the First Amendment built «a wall of separation between church and state» saw the light of day not in a court ruling or piece of legislation, but in a letter from President Jefferson to the Danbury, Connecticut, Baptist Association in 1802.

And SCOTUS thru their rulings and writings have stated that there indeed is a wall of separation between church and state.

Thomas Jefferson was very concerned to keep a strong wall of separation between church and state.

Christians are the dominant religion in the country, but there should be a wall of separation between government and religion.

Does someone want to talk about «the wall of separation between church and state»?

Democrats, invoking Thomas Jefferson's metaphor of a «wall of separation between church and state,» responded the rise of the Religious Right in the late seventies by arguing that religion was a private matter that should have no place in political life.

Through his blood Christ has broken down the wall of separation between Jews and gentiles and has made possible a table fellowship between them and among all races and peoples.

What Jefferson defined, rather extravagantly, as «the absolute wall of separation between church and state» has been a creative but also dangerous characteristic of our national culture.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, «I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.

Jefferson's letter in response argued for a very different concept - a «wall of separation between Church & State» - that, according to him, was enshrined in the First Amendment.

So those Christians who are so eager to break down the wall of separation between church and state would be well - adivsed to rethink their positions.

Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion to another... in the words of Jefferson, the [First Amendment] clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect «a wall of separation between church and State»... That wall must be kept high and impregnable.

The precious wall of separation between church and state was rebuilt higher and more solid than ever.

The guiding metaphor, the «wall of separation between church and state,» first appeared in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson 14 years after the First Amendment was drafted.

Washington (CNN)- Thomas Jefferson famously wrote about the wall of separation between church and state.

«Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.»

Not exact matches

When it comes to the courts, our narrative would begin in the mid-twentieth century when the American judiciary was guided by an interpretation of the First Amendment that posited a «wall of separation» between «church and state.»

Rather than working to tearing down this wall and making the world a better place, American society and the media continually shore up this separation between «faith» and reason, hence the comparitively sorry state of science and research in our country today.

Richard John Neuhaus» comment on Douglas Laycock's «Substantive Neutrality Revisited» law - review article (While We're At It, June / July 2008) referred to Philip Hamburger's 2002 book Separation of Church and State as a «magnificent» debunking of Jefferson's wall between church and state.

What makes it vexing is that, when it comes to church / state questions, Americans have traditionally opted for a middle path between a theocratic marriage and Great - Wall - of - China - style separation.

Some continue to believe, mistakenly, that our constitutional «wall of separation» between church and state prohibits serious study of religion in public schools.

I think there ought to be a strict separation or wall built between our religious faith and our practice of political authority in office.

If a wall of separation is erected between religion and the state (and its schools), that wall will prove to be a tomb in which church, state, and schools will decay with a civilization that has lost its soul.

In support of this position the famous Jeffersonian doctrine of the «wall of separation» between church and state is regularly invoked.

Ancient cities, Weber notes, were socially structured by a separation between those who made a claim of descent from the founding clans (patricians) and those who could make no such claim (plebeians), a separation often spatially represented by the isolation of plebeians either at the foot of the sacred hill of the polis or in ghettos clustered at the walls.

The real problem is that much «Wall of Separation» rhetoric implies there is a clear, impregnable line between church and state activity when in practice over the twentieth century the principle of church - state separation has become one of lively democratic contestation and a degree of flexibility, allowing Catholics and other religious organizations to enter the public sphere and participate on the same terms as any otSeparation» rhetoric implies there is a clear, impregnable line between church and state activity when in practice over the twentieth century the principle of church - state separation has become one of lively democratic contestation and a degree of flexibility, allowing Catholics and other religious organizations to enter the public sphere and participate on the same terms as any otseparation has become one of lively democratic contestation and a degree of flexibility, allowing Catholics and other religious organizations to enter the public sphere and participate on the same terms as any other group.

This pellet diameter allows for a certain separation between the inside wall of the cladding and the pellet, according to drawings.

But the Court also unanimously adopted the language of Justice Hugo Black in the same case: «The clause [no establishment of religion] was intended to erect «a wall of separation» between church and state.»

That clause prohibits «any law respecting an Establishment of Religion» and is popularly understood to create a «wall of separation» between church and state.

Direct communication to other curious participants appears possible over the relatively short distance from one side of the pavilion to the other, but its actuality is playfully complicated by the imposed visual separation between a speaker and an addressee: you are never sure which of the many cans embedded in the freestanding walls of this room will connect you to someone on the other end.

Having a space to work from that isn't right on the other side of the wall from the rest of the family, and one that offers privacy and peace and quiet so that you can stay focused, could be the magic sauce you need to focus better on your work, and being able to close the door and walk away from it at the end of the day may offer you a clearer sense of separation between work and home life.

Although better known for the ban in Title X-funded projects on nondirective counseling and referral for abortion on request, the measure also called for a physical and financial «wall of separation» between an agency's publicly funded family planning program and its privately funded abortion activities.