Sentences with phrase «want better claims»

You may want more liability protection, or maybe you want better claims service.

Not exact matches

Helix, though, wants to customize its mattresses to each person's needs because it claims that is actually the best way to avoid a misaligned spine, which is a common problem that results from sleeping on an inadequate mattress.

BTW, while companies claim to want «well - rounded individuals,» what they really mean is that they want employees who can do multiple jobs.

O'Brien, according to the claim, told Quenneville it would be best if he didn't make a «fuss» about his termination if he wanted a good reference in the future.

But Google claims that feedback (both good and bad) is exactly what it wants.

Ellison said that Oracle's cloud computing strategy takes into account the idea that customers want to use a mix of their own data centers, as well as those from providers, an idea that some refer to as a «hybrid cloud,» which Microsoft has also claimed it supports.

As Clinton said in the documentary, «If you want to save lives and stop an epidemic that has claimed the lives of tens of millions of people, treatment is the best prevention.

JPMorgan executives are the latest top bankers to claim they want to be more George Bailey than, well, J.P. Morgan.

The tribes also claimed he lacked the authority to shrink the monuments and wanted to make it clear that the issue with shrinking the monuments is cultural as well as environmental.

Malinowski said on Friday that he was shocked to hear that the administration was considering «giving the Russians exactly what they wanted in exchange for absolutely nothing,» echoing Fried's earlier claim on MSNBC that the administration seemed prepared to rescind sanctions «in exchange for, well, nothing,»

I don't need big rural coverage (contrary to what you claimed, many don't), I don't want a new phone, I don't care about updates, I just want a basic phone service at the best price with reasonable reliability in the burbs near Seattle.

Not only do you want to have the correct coverage to protect your business in the case of claim, you want to protect your investor's interests as well.

The group also wants the bill's authors to make it easier for businesses to claim a lower 25 percent income tax rate, as well as to speed up their planned repeal of the estate tax, in a bid to promote economic growth.

We can go back as far as we want, but heck we will just stop it conveniently at the point that best supports the claim of Israel.

Wanting evidence from only one God while claiming you're doing it to validate the lie, well, you just debunked your own lie.

If you don't want responses that negate what you have claimed FAUX news would be better suited to your mentality (low level crazy).

Muneef you know these people are so quick to call out the radicals, they do nt know what radical is, there for they cant identifiy it if they wanted to.Why is that because the truth is a work in progess and if someone at sometime in their life claimed to have recieved it there will be a good difference in their lives that will effect those around them, and if there is not, and all you have is someone repeating scriptures and playing a role Well thats all you have.

I'm sure you understand which is why you never answer questions like this directly, but to be sure — why do you trust claims in the bible (which are dubious at best) but would want verification in all other walks of life?

You might want to claim that you Christians have some extra facts, but you have to remember that many of us atheists were once believers as well, so we know that this is false.

If someone wants to know your position on things, better they get it directly from you not from those who claim to speak for you.

He can claim all he wants to the God «told him» to do this, but I think that's called hearsay evidence, and it does not normally stand up well in a court of law.

We are simply not claiming to know what god is, what god wants or to think that humans are moral and good because they follow some ancient scripture — or not.

- how you can claim it's a «morally good choice» to elect a president who wants to bring back waterboarding and other forms of torture, who wants to target the families of terrorists because «that's what they do to us,» and who admires the tactics of Vladimir Putin and Saddam Hussein

Those claiming that there is predestination toward damnation would have a problem with the following verse (and others): «This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.»

We witnessed a horrible car crash while driving one evening and her first words were, «OH MY GOD» Well Ken, when I am surprised I will often exclaim «bugger me» but it does nt mean I actually want to be buggered, its an expression, not a claim of belief.

Well it was not Islam only spread by the sword unless you want to claim that crusaders were Muslims as wWell it was not Islam only spread by the sword unless you want to claim that crusaders were Muslims as wellwell?

Well, they can claim that all they want, just as I can claim that Unicorns exist.

Because I take seriously Whitehead's claim that the most fundamental order of reality is aesthetic, and the attendant doctrine that «The real world is good when it is beautiful» (AI, Chapter XVIII, Section III), I want to propose that we use the category of beauty as the norm in constructing our images of person - hood and of personal and communal relations.

Like a tourist who feels compelled to carve his initials in well - traveled public places, Dunham wants to claim something as her own.

If Cobb wants to call what I have referred to as «actual» regions (actualized» regions might be better) standpoints, then Cobb's doctrine with respect to Cod's relationship to the world must be called the Doctrine of Standpoint Inclusion, because the Doctrine of Regional Inclusion is the claim that God's actual (i.e., particular, definite) region includes the particular, definite region of each occasion.

But the point is: having two contrary thoughts like this amounts to I - want - to - feel - good nonsense when it comes to empirical claims.

At the point you claim to know god is love and he wants what is best for us, you are at that point claiming to know the mind of god, violating the 1st premise.

Testimony wants to justify, to prove the good basis of an assertion which, beyond the fact, claims to attain its meaning.

Also, there is a part of the article where one of the so - called Theologians claim that Christians don't hate the world, that they «love the world and want to change it for the better».

A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.

Until then if atheists want to put up a billboard which was paid with their OWN money to voice their opinion just be a good and respecting christian you claim to be and ZIP IT!

Surely this flight may not really be caused by sober objectivity, and a man may even pretend to venerate the incomprehensible silence while his whole attitude actually remains an escape and he only wants a superficial and guilt - ridden well - being in order to escape from the claim of the incomprehensible.

I want to direct my remarks to a critique of this double pretension of philosophy, with the idea that at the end of such undertaking the apparently unreasonable claim of revelation might be better understood as a nonviolent appeal.

For that matter, if I make the claim that there will be infinite reward for everyone who gives me ten percent of their income for the rest of their lives and infinite punishment for anyone who does not, my claim has equal standing with either of those religions under Pascale's Wager and you'd better start paying up if you want to hedge your bets.

I didn't care who answered, I just wanted an answer, not a bunch of empty claims, dodges, and, for lack of a better way to describe it, ramblings and incoherence.

If someone wants to get a little more traction claiming that the Bible has contradictions, they'd better work at it a little harder.

But when some other group claims religious freedom for what they want to do, it's suddenly just not good enough for any reason.

However, I think it fair to note as well that when he states that «one of the things in the abusers» minds was that the interrogators wanted and approved of some abuse,» that claim is based principally on what the abusers said.

When people get treated so poorly by those who claim to be acting in God's best interests, some people end up wanting nothing to do with God, and often live much of the lives apart from Him.

«The South Australian claim, principally, is to say we want the environmental ambitions of this to be more ambitious than they currently are, so actually achieve better outcomes for the Murray - Darling basin than is currently in the draft.

I don't claim to know what is gonna happen, even if I want to I'll only predict good things.

We don't need the distraction of a prolonged saga, if he wants to leave, good for him, Sagna left, Debuchy came in, Debuchy got injured, Bellerin Came in, if Bellerin leaves, there are three or more players who would be happy to claim the RWB spot (Ox, Niles and Campbell), we need to focus on players who actually are begging for a chance.

If you wanted to make such an outrageous claim, then you should've made better arguments as to why that information substantially changes the arguments I made.

The report claims Neymar seems to have regrets over the move to PSG and that he wants a return to Barcelona, having come to the realisation that the French capital may not be the best place for him to fulfil his potential and big ambitions in the game.

Martial may have had a better chance of playing regularly if he had moved to the Emirates, however, in January as the Times claimed that it was Martial - and not Mkhitaryan - that Arsene Wenger originally wanted to trade Sanchez for.