Sentences with phrase «want less government»

If you want less government, lower government spending, and much lower taxes, please join the Libertarian Party today.

Republican candidates Scott Walker and Mark Neumann have pledged they want less government spending.

Why is it the Repugs who claim they want less government, who are issuing bans against gay marriage?

Not exact matches

On the other hand, if you wanted to keep aggregate government revenue the same, you could get away with increasing the GST to 6 - 7 % (and presumably compensate for the decreased federal revenue by reducing transfers to the provinces by $ 20 billion, leaving the provinces, collectively, in more or less the same position).

Yet by setting yields so low and bond prices so high, markets are sending a clear signal that they want more, not less, government debt.

Liberal government pledges to reduce to $ 3 the fares for all GO Transit trips that are either less than 10 kilometres or are taken within the city of Toronto, and wants to being talks about the province taking ownership of the subway.

No financial services company wants to find itself apologizing to the public and regulators for discriminatory effects caused by its own technology, much less paying damages in the context of government enforcement or private litigation.

«If by a fiscal conservative, one means a person who wants to reduce the size of government through less government spending, lower taxes, balanced budgets and lower debt burdens, then Harper is clearly not a fiscal conservative.»

If Romney wants a running mate who can explain how Republican policies can lower health care premiums, increase jobs, lower energy prices, get government to work better for less money, and maintain the safety net for our elderly while avoiding huge tax increases, then Jindal is the guy.

The greater tax burden placed on corporations, whether you want to admit it or not, the less they will hire and the more people will need the government.

You can't have a smaller government with less power and less regulations if you want to control what substances 300 million people decide to take.

As republicans we preach less government but at the same time half of us want to elect a moron that wants to through his beliefs on all of us.

So the liberals of today want more government not less.

It has frequently been noted that Stalin turned to the churches when he wanted help in getting the Russian people to rise up and fight Hitler, but it has less often been noted that the Soviet government also turns to church leadership — both Orthodox and Protestant — when it wants to take initiatives toward peace and arms reductions.

«This is very simple: Americans want the government to stay open, and they want it to spend less money.

While there is a remarkable resemblance, it really should be a question of whether Obama acts like Satan... he certainly seems to want the destruction of Israel... reduction in religious freedom... less individual freedom... more government control...

They say what they feel they must say to get our support when they want our support, but on so many issues - on modernising our politics, on the recall of MPs, on controlling our borders on less government, on bank reform, on cutting public debt, on an EU referendum - they never actually make it happen.»

True Friend, I as an atheist and human being like you, would not want (and do not want to see) a system of government, culture, society, religion, or authority where if I were to wave a careless hand with unthinking anger, the deaths of anyone would be encompassed, much less the deaths of billions of human beings of any belief?

You just want more government involvement when we really need less, much less.

Even if the government continues checks on non-EU goods at, say, Felixstowe, which handles less trade from Europe, non-EU exporters will want to avoid UK tariffs and simply divert their goods through ports such as Rotterdam.

If the government truly wants to help us feel less isolated, they must reaffirm their support for refugee protection and ensure the asylum system reflects those values.

So if the government can't borrow more or spend less, then if it wants to cut the deficit, the only option is to raise taxes.

They want the government to reverse this, to tax them less and take some of the inflationary pressures off their budgets.

With speculation at various points that the Government would struggle to get the Bill through as it wished - with MPs wanting to change the referendum date, impose those thresholds or be less prescriptive about the electorate quotas of the new constituencies - the whips will doubtless be quietly pleased about it attaining a majority of 57.

I wanted to focus my comments less on the process — it does not really need to be said any longer that the process of arriving at this treaty has been deeply dishonest and full of subterfuge, practised both by those proposing the new treaty and by the Government here in the lead - up to signing it — and principally on the contents.

Government must ensure that all Green Deal compliant measures pay the lower 5 % rate of VAT as it is perverse to charge 5 % tax on a product, i.e. energy, that we want people to use less of, but 20 % on the measures which help them stop using it.»

Ms Burrow also warned against the dangers of austerity: «Given a choice of economic policies, two - thirds of people support government action to invest in job creation to allow economies to grow and pay off debts compared with less than one in four who want debts paid off now by cutting back on government spending.»

If you consider that Authoritarian leaders can spend all the money they want to, It might make an Authoritarian government less economically secure.

Jim Fitzpatrick, the postal services minister, says the government wants to keep the Post Office network but must acknowledge the fact that less people are using it.

They want government off the backs of their big business sponsors, they could care less about the rest of us.

So if that describes what Nigeria is and what it ought to be, we also want to say that government should be seen as an enabler; a platform that more or less creates the enabling environment for the public sector to thrive» he said.

But everyone knows NY is better off with a balanced government and your team is about increasing taxes to pay for who knows what that nobody wants while my team is for tax cuts and limited / less spending.

So presumably, the less wealthy, after being told what to spend their money on by «society» for all their working years, reach pensionable age fully moulded by a paternalistic government into financially responsible citizens who will commit a significant amount of their time to research where they want to invest their pensions, and subsequently enjoy «regular updates on how their pension fund was growing» — because of course, like house prices, pension funds can only rise in value.

Democrats aren't about less government, they want more and that only leads to stagnation, more spending and higher taxes.

As the government shutdown continued for its second day, one thing was clear to both sides of the negotiations to end it: The president was either unwilling or unable to articulate the immigration policy he wanted, much less understand the nuances of what it would involve.

Conservative backbenchers and party members alike want to see it retain its own distinct identity, and a sense that Liberal Democrat concerns are more important to Downing Street than their own helps to explain, at least in part, recent rebellions and discontent, and hence the Government working less effectively than it might.

«In many ways, [the government] could use our co-operation on home affairs as an asset, and say: «We know you didn't vote to make us less safe, we don't want to lower our guard, so this is going to take a while,»» Clegg said.

«We want to start right out of the box by doing an additional tax cut for the middle class because the best thing we can say to our middle - class brothers and sisters is, «You know what, government is going to take less of your paycheck every week.»»

«I want to make sure that politics costs us less in Britain, and I would make sure that my government would take a lead in that if we were fortunate enough to be elected.»

He said the government was feeling the «pressure» of citizens against its decision on the agreement and so wanted to redirect their concerns to less sensitive matters such as the renaming of the seat of government.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage, whose party wants less immigration into the UK, said the government was «panicking» and trying to «sort the problem out in an overly fast and heavy handed manner».

I'm glad that there are so many protests going on and I'm glad people are becoming less complacent, you know it's really nice to have if you work for a business you have employees that you trust that you can let go and let do the job you want them to do, it's wonderful if we had a government that we could trust but governments have always been corrupt and whether they're more or less corrupt depends on the time.

Synopsis: Jim McAllister (Matthew Broderick), a well - liked high school government teacher, can't help but notice that successful student Tracy Flick (Reese Witherspoon) uses less than ethical tactics to get what she wants.

Yet the world changed, eLearning market competition increased and corporations wanted more for less and as a result of high profile corruption, governments dictated transparency.

The math is simple: the federal government is spending a trillion dollars a year it doesn't have, entitlements are on an unsustainable course, and nobody wants to raise taxes on the 98 % of families earning less than $ 250,000 a year.

«The tables have become less a way of giving parents the information they want and more an arms - length policy lever by which successive governments have sought to influence the decisions heads take about how to run their schools,» said United Learning's chief executive, Jon Coles.

It almost seems like the government wants to reward us for taking the risk of investing in stocks by getting us to pay less taxes when we do!

Emerging Market government bonds (If you want risk, stick to the less popular ones, like Venezuela, Argentina, Lebanon, Turkey, or just invest in a broad index ETF like EMB)

We don't want financial institutions, much less large ones, to rely on the idea that the Federal Government has their back.

GM wants the bond holders to take less than they likely would if the company went bankrupt and the government is looming with a silent threat that the bond holders might not get treated like they would in a normal bankruptcy.