Sentences with phrase «want money issues»

Not exact matches

«The flipside is that when investors give money, they don't necessarily want to give honest feedback to the founder about issues or problems within the company,» said Rahn.

As I became older, I knew that I wanted to ensure I had a career which enabled me to go beyond providing for my family's basic needs, but to give us a lifestyle where money was not an issue.

In addition, you can easily transform your backyard to make it party friendly for very little money: take a few hours to pick up any litter or junk, fix any small landscaping issues, and if you want, rent or purchase a tent: pop - up party tents are usually inexpensive and add shade and also make your backyard look more party ready.

Our society is ingrained with the current monetary system of fiat money, where governments issue it, they can put out as much of it as they want.

Most of us go into marriage, or cohabitation, without much of a strategy other than an «I love you and I want to make it work» so it is not long before the issue of money rears its ugly head.

Unless you want to encounter unneeded issues along the way, don't put more money into your campaign than you can afford to lose until you craft a winning strategy.

Can I become a property manager or a residential manager without a degree, although Im working on getting one in the future, I already collect rent for a few units, deal with leases and property issues, I have been asked by several property owners now if I could do it for them and I do want to pursue this and make more money.

I liken this to a scuba diver who goes down and he has about an hour's worth of air, and then he's got ta come back up again and either get another tank or refill his tank, so you're limited on how much air you can have if you're scuba diving, but in business, unless you have a scuba diving type business, you don't wan na have to keep having to refill your tank, and so that's the issue that I see faces a lot of entrepreneurs and startups, is the amount of time and energy it takes to raise money for your business.

You shouldn't have issues creating and funding an account, and if you want to withdraw your cash, you should have no problems seeing that money show up in your bank account.

The issue right now is trust — nobody wants to put their money in a sector where what you see may not be what you actually get.

I find this lesson the hardest because nobody wants to be left out of a hot issue or a new way to make money.

The Catholic Church's position on artificial birth control has NO basis in the teachings of Christ... it was not an issue then... the teaching is solely based on the opinion of the men running the church who claim «divine inspiration»... BULL... they wanted people to have more kids so they could contribute more money to the church so that the so - called «princes of the church» could maintain their princely life - style.

If you don't want money to be an issue, put a basket on the refreshment table.People will give and the expenses will get paid.

You might call it a listening issue, an empathy issue or a sympathy issue, but the takeaway is that navigating conflicts about finances successfully takes a more holistic approach to understanding your partner's experience than just the fact they don't want to spend money on that weekend trip to Nashville.

The issue is that the Church doesn't want its subjects to understand the Hebrew because then they wouldn't have any subjects to extort money from.

Some wanted money, most had drug, drink and overwhelming life issues that had led them onto the streets.

I want to share with you one of the biggest issues I struggle with: money Many years ago I made a vow of poverty.

They just wanted to get some of the new money, I thought, whereas I was approaching the issue administratively, and as a social scientist.

Your party's top candidate wants to put America back into the 15th century, when heretics are beaten, stumping solely on social issues... yeah... put your money where your mouth is!!!

I am not one of the Arsenal fans that are so desperate for the club to get rid of Arsene Wenger and get a new manager in that I want the team to lose and fail to make the Champions League spots, although I know it is an issue and we know that the club is very focused on money and would hate to lose the financial benefits of Europe's top club competition.

The issue is that no coach worth the money wants to coach here.

How many of those guys do you think would be willing to re-invest in the clubs transfer fund, how many do you think would want to recouparate their money and how many would want to sack the man in charge... I remind you of Usmanov who promised millions in transfer money to Arsenal, but its not his call to make... till the board votes unanimously on the issue or one invididual buys out the other board members for all the controlling shares... we are limited to how much we can spend because its not one persons money its all of theirs.

We must change things are board level because someone there must have an issue with spending money, great finacial figures released by Arsenal again & we spend 5 million in the transfer window & to be fair spent little in the summer too in comparsion to everyone else, all we get is it is not easy to find you players & I take on board some of what Wengers says but at this stage we must bring in someone to help him because he is ntrying to do too much at the club & I would gladly through my hat in the ring to be come head of purchasing but I have a feeling they would not let me spend a penny HELP WANTED to improve the same old story

«They want to protect their money, they think everything is theirs, we're just meat to them, and people really do have issues once they leave that game.

I think a major issue with moving the «surplus» players is that they are on big money with Arsenal, and the teams they are trying to sell them to don't want to, and will not pay them the money they are making with Arsenal.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

its not simply the case of we want this guy so he will come, there is the issue of intrest on the players behalf, we may want the player be he may not want to leave and then the one key factor money... See we have money to go out and spend but unlike the dumbasses that consider spending near enough # 60 million on Fabian Delph and Raheem sterling as a good investment..

SEE MORE: Liverpool international wanted by Euro giants; big - money hitman could be set for exit South American forward being targeted by Liverpool as part of Klopp's summer rebuild Work permit issues could scupper Liverpool's attempts to sign Bundesliga winger

It's not just the players it's the whole club it's all out money at Arsenal Monaco fans all over the ground the other evening laughing and taking the p At any other ground it wouldn't happen, but the gound is full of white collar people who don't see that as an issue, this site is full of Spurs fans who want Wenger to stay, that way they have a chance of finishing above us

IF it is not money, then I hope the issue is that Nasri is sick and tired of playing on the wings and wants to finally play more centrally to advance his career.

Though, some security issue may arise if the sale of this product is made all over the world and logistics for selling might need more manpower, it is still worth taking the risk as many would see this product and want to buy and are restricted or even merchants are surfing the net daily in the aforementioned regions for the next best product to deal to increase their store rating and to make honest money alongside.

If you've ever had stink issues with microfiber, have hard water, want to go with a more natural fiber, want to save money, want to save water, these are all good reasons to use flat diapers, even inside a standard «fancy» pocket diaper.

SAFER is a fantastic organization which not only want to discuss and solve car seat issues but are also willing to spend money and resources on this very important area.

While whole grain acceptability isn't a problem (per say) for us, giving districts more money isn't going to solve the issue of kids not wanting whole grain items.

Six full - day seminars: First Feedings: the Influence of Birth Practices on Breastfeeding Initiation; It's All About Money: Political Influences on Infant Feeding; Milk Supply Made Easy: Current Research in Milk Synthesis and Infant Suck; Leave»Em Wanting More: Strategies for Persuasive Breastfeeding Classes; The Pain Issue: Prevention and Management of Breast and Nipple Problems; and Sleeping Through: New Research on Infant Sleep Patterns and Risk of SIDS.

Another major issue still unresolved, according to Tom Precious of The Buffalo News: whether to drive more money to charter schools, as Senate Republicans want, or into the traditional public school systems, as Assembly Democrats insist upon.

«Those are the issues that might motivate the average person on the street, and they want those people to be excited so they can get what they really want, which is money and power.»

I'm not a player hater, so I have no issue with people wanting to make money.

Williams tells us about some of the ridiculous issues he's lobbied for, the steady flow of money that congresspeople need, and how he wants to take down the crazy campaign finance system.

The fact is that the European Union issue is more important than any of that, because it's about the decision of whether you want your laws made in Brussels and that march towards ever - closer union, or whether you want our country to make its own laws, our politicians to make the laws in this country, for us to be able to determine our immigration policy, to decide how we're spending our public money.

«But the truth of the matter is I have to give people that want to aspire to fill the vacancy — which it would be if I retired — time to raise the money and get known throughout the district, and I meet every week on this issue with different candidates, and those I haven't met with I'm meeting with this weekend.»

Now I subsequently heard about it because there was a to - and - fro over this money, contribution issue till somebody finally called me that this is what is going on: «They know me, they want to give me the money and I can pass it on, not give it to Victor Smith and Victor Smith is saying that: «no, he would take it to the prof, [because] I'm not the one who is going to be the candidate,» blah blah blah blah that type of rubbish.

MyDD's Jonathan Singer and Hotline's Jennifer Skala both pick up on a statement from Barack Obama hinting that, contrary to previous statements, he won't accept public financing because «We have created a parallel public financing system where the American people decide if they want to support a campaign they can get on the Internet and finance it...» Skala argues that since Obama isn't taking money from PACs or Washington lobbyists (state lobbyists is another issue), «What would he have to prove by signing up for public financing?»

The INEC boss was quoted to have said «Funding is always an issue, but I can say that for INEC in terms of our preparation, it is no longer an issue, anybody will always want to have more money but we believe that we have sufficient resources to be able to conduct the 2015 general elections.

Sean Ryan [email protected] Contractors want to reduce diesel emissions with public money rather than submitting to government mandates that force the issue and cripple companies.

Steve: And you also have the hypothetical presidential candidate coming back to that issue of, where do you want that money to go?

Because the message that I carry with me, I don't want it to be tainted; I don't want anyone to say, «Well, he's only suing because he wants money; that's the reason why he is talking about the whole issue of concussion.»

For example, if your local neighborhood biotech company wanted to raise money using a bond, they could do it in two ways: First, they could just issue a bond based on their company name and its general assets.

The other issue I have is we are on a (very) high deductible medical plan, currently between jobs, so funds are somewhat limited and I don't want to experiment with docs and keep wasting money on dogmatists, if you see what I mean.

So if you were to put those 2 together, I mean I know that that sounds like you know, taking a nuclear bomb to the issue but if you really wan na know, beyond the shadow of the doubt and money really wasn't an issue for you or you have whatever, flexible savings account, health savings account, if you're here on the US, you can pay for this stuff tax deductible.