Sentences with phrase «want more coal»

Not exact matches

The legislation provided financial support for four more months of healthcare benefits for coal miners, through April, but Manchin and other Senate Democrats wanted at least a year.

«The economic potential from the Marcellus Shale could provide a badly needed boost to the economy of the Southern Tier and even many environmentalists agree we want to produce more domestic natural gas that reduces the need for environmentally damaging fuel sources such as coal,» his campaign statement said, while adding, «Existing watersheds are sacrosanct, and Andrew Cuomo would not support any drilling that would threaten the state's major sources of drinking water.»

A promise to coal country «I will be very clear, I want to do more to help in coal country,» Clinton said at the event, according to The New York Times.

Minnesota's legislators wanted more renewable power, North Dakota farmers looked forward to the extra income, and environmental groups championed the line for carrying «green power» and cutting reliance on coal.

The MPs want more FGD to be used, and call on the government to support clean coal demonstration projects.

3) Coal Tar: I have found that not that many people may want to smell like a coal tar pit, and by using natural skin care products you will be exuding a subtle natural or even exotic fragrance, making the whole experience that much more pleasuraCoal Tar: I have found that not that many people may want to smell like a coal tar pit, and by using natural skin care products you will be exuding a subtle natural or even exotic fragrance, making the whole experience that much more pleasuracoal tar pit, and by using natural skin care products you will be exuding a subtle natural or even exotic fragrance, making the whole experience that much more pleasurable.

Nobody wants to smell like a sulphur furnace or a coal tar pit, proclaiming disease all around themselves, by using natural skin care products you will be exuding a subtle natural or even exotic fragrance, making the whole experience much more pleasurable.

As for the criticism for McCain wanting to build non-carbon capturing coal plants, since we're going to be burning coal for decades by any estimate, if we implement a carbon restrictive regime, wouldn't we want to allow industry to build new plants that are more efficient than the current fleet?

Those who want clean coal technology, more wind and solar, nuclear power, biomass and bio-fuels will have their opportunity through a new market that rewards those and other innovations in clean energy.

The first step in this is to make electricity from coal much more expensive because the utilities will need to generate the money to pay the carbon tax (or offsets or whatever you want to call them).

It may be abundant, but if we want to prevent catastrophic global warming we need to do more than just make sure minimal pollution controls are in place, we need to phase out the burning of coal.

We want energy production technologies that make coal power plants and coal mining look ever more archaic and unfashionable so that no developed or developing nation can build another one with any pride, and so even energy companies will shut down existing plants with a sense of relief, rather than regret.

In an effort to move the discussion closer to that more «full portfolio» view, I would actually argue that if you care about climate, in the near term, you might want to be thinking about coal as much or more than you think about renewables.

But we want Bimblebox to set a precedent to show that conservation of nature is worth more than short - term profits from coal mining.

I definitely support the eco groups who want coal ash to be more regulated.

Additionally, I wanted to delve a little more into the much publicized domestic coal supply woes of China that we might have all read about at some point or another.

I want to see @BjornLomborg claim the Chinese should burn more coal and eat more smog instead of PV.

As more coal and nuclear plants close, PJM wants to make sure the region or parts of it don't become overly dependent on a single source of fuel, PJM President and CEO Andrew Ott said during an April 30 press call announcing the fuel security initiative.

[24] According to People's World, «Patriot Coal now wants to be released from its pension and retirement obligations covering more than 20,000 UMWA retirees and beneficiaries in West Virginia, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky and Ohio....

According to People's World, «Patriot Coal now wants to be released from its pension and retirement obligations covering more than 20,000 UMWA retirees and beneficiaries in West Virginia, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky and Ohio» [12](see below for more).

As Bill McKibben, the founder of 350.org says: «It's astonishing that by 2017 there's anyone left in the world who wants to keep building coal - fired power plants — there really isn't a more destructive path they could be taking.

Biggest coal company wants more time to implement EU pollution standards as pressure for energy transition grows.

Neither communities nor utilities want dirty, expensive coal when clean energy is more affordable and creates more jobs right now.»

meanwhile, china builds coal - fired power stations by the week, while australia demonises coal & wants to shut down its own & give away more taxpayer money for expensive solar, wind & other unworkable, unnecessary CAGW «solutions»!

What I» ve said is that we would put a cap - and - trade system in place that is more — that is as aggressive if not more aggressive than anybody else» s out there, so if somebody wants to build a coal - powered plant, they can, it» s just that it will bankrupt them because they» re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that» s being emitted.

The companies also back natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and want to see more research and development into renewables and carbon capture and storage.

To deal with the failures of «going green» Western governments, still wanting to appear green, justify abandoning alternate energies and returning to coal by saying energy and jobs are more important in the short term.

«Whether there's a little more oil or a little less oil will change the details, but if we want to change the overall shape of the warming curve, it matters what we do with coal.»

You would want to run coal at night to displace more expensive resources during the peak.

The government wants to install 215 GW of renewable energy by 2025, and renewables are getting cheaper and cheaper, so there's real doubt that more coal will be needed even then.

Congress offers change without change — a green economy built on cheap coal and petrol; a healthcare transformation that asks nobody to pay more taxes or behave any differently — because that is what voters want.

The groups wanted more studies of the environmental impacts of the mine, including the greenhouse gas emissions that will come from the burning of coal.

The environment ministry projects that if all the planned plants are built, by 2030 coal's carbon emissions would more than offset the cuts Japan wants to make elsewhere.

In short, if we want a 100 percent renewables world, with no coal, gas, or nuclear, we'll need to build more power generation capacity, faster, than at any time in history.

Oh noz, the industry has realized that the cheapest way (which is to say «the way that bes preserves living standards) to cut carbon emissions is to switch from coal to natural gas... which means that they're not taking the more expensive way (which is to say «way that destroys living standards») that we want them to.

Here in the UK the state wants to continue the status quo with more nukes, fracking and «clean» coal.

But if Donald Trump really wants to create jobs, then he's going to be pro-solar, because there are a lot more jobs installing solar panels on people's roofs than there are in digging up coal or burning it.

All these adds that tell us that coal is so dirty want to sell our coal to China while we have to pay more for conversion to natural gas for our power plants.

Ten or more Democrats currently have problems with the bill — they want to find a way to prevent costs to industries like steel, coal, and oil from rising.

She wanted to make life easier and more efficient for women to run the kitchen, the way Taylor made it easier for men to shovel coal.

The research showed that the untapped reserves of coal, oil, and gas identified by the world's fossil fuel industry contained five times more carbon than we can burn if we want to keep from raising the planet's temperature by more than two degrees Celsius.

It seems the coal industry is not causing enough killing for the Turnbull government, he wants Australia to manufacture and export machines and devices that are more directly aimed at killing people.

The oil giants also want to do more to promote natural gas, which has become more abundant because of recent developments in the exploitation of shale gas and emits half as much greenhouse gas as coal does.

But if you want to do more just crack open another bag and coals and keep cooking.