Do
you want poor people to just kill their pets so they don't have them anymore?
These greed - heads
want all poor people to die.
Not exact matches
It's certainly a lot closer to driving the change Victoria's Secret claims it
wants to see, instead of what it's doing now which is maintaining the structure that actually keeps
people poor — and kids slaving away in cotton fields.
This Silicon Valley upstart
wants to help
poor people get health care.
Many
people nowadays shop online, not just for the convenience but because they
want to avoid
poor customer service.
«Unless you have that, then
people will think they can put their money into whatever they
want, and they'll always make more money, until the costs get socialized and everybody wonders why everyone in China is so
poor.»
The best part is that when you communicate your expectations well,
poor performers will often weed themselves out by leaving on their own while the
people who really do
want to stay will give you all that they can.
Atwater — who actually
wanted to use his work in the 1890s to help
poor people get the most calories for their money — determined the average number of calories in four main energy sources: carbs, fats, protein, and alcohol.
In my opinion, one of the reasons
people do such a
poor job in hiring, is that they just
want to get it over with,» Matuson says.
If Zuckerberg really is altruistic and
wants to help
poor people get onto the Internet, he could easily fund free wireless data without any pre-selected applications and let those
people choose which services and sites they
want to use on their own.
«
People don't
want to become
poor again.
But I believe that newer immigrants from
poorer countries are hardworking and not afraid of doing jobs that
people here don't
want to do.
And if you
want to be
poor, hang out with
poor people.»
Of course, I don't
want people to suffer, but the longer both the expansion and bull market continue, the more we tend to forget that they can actually end, leading some to make
poor financial decisions.
While I think it is wonderful that so many
people are excited to write and blog about about personal finance, personally I would be cautious about religiously following the advice of a college freshman who just finished reading Rich Dad
Poor Dad and now believes himself to be a personal finance expert and
wants to make a buck blogging about it.
The ratio of rich
people to
poor people is just so high; however, you need to ask yourself which side you
want to fall to.
not to mention the catholic faith
wants to help
poor people, donate money donate money, yet the pope sits on a 24k gold throne at the Vatican during mass.
Other politicians
want to terminate cash assistance and instead provide
poor people with vouchers that could be «redeemed» for social services at private organizations.
Rich
people who
want to make
poor people feel good about being
poor.
At that point, it was about masturbation only (no one had made a comparison to homosexuality), so, without much personal stake in the debate, I thought to myself «See, this is why
people don't like the answers, not (always) because it doesn't let them do what they
want, but because the answers are sometimes very
poor indeed.»
If
poor people want help let them go to church and beg.
Saying that those «mean old Republicans»
want to deny sick and
poor people decent healthcare is simplistic, naive, and pure nonsense.
involvement, and don't
want government to run our affairs, but they don't» mind that the Corporate power in this country is becoming more like Organized Crime Mafia, and they turn the blind eye to their lawlessness and the injustice done, and heavy burdens that are being loaded on the ordinary
people by those in power... That's why we have the
poor, and ever - increasingly — becoming -
poor working class.
Caesar
wants to give food to the
poor so he taxes his
people.
I've heard other well - educated and «progressive» thinkers argue that
poor people just don't really
want to work.
Dems
want everyone
poor and on government welfare so they will keep them voted into office, while they forever are claiming to find ways to get
people back to work.
Most
people would never admit to thinking that
poor people are lazy, yet so many
people — Christian or not — believe that if
poor people * really *
wanted to, they'd find a way to get out of it.
Of course we know that
people are not
poor because they are lazy and stupid and that
poor people do not always
want handouts, etc..
If
people want to give to the
poor, I say do it out of charity and kindness... and do it DIRECTLY, rather than let the Roman Catholic Church OR the Govt.
We really don't
want stinky, addicted, mentally ill,
poor, troubled
people, prostitutes, gays,
people who need help, and the list goes on and on.
Republicans DO
want to take care of the
poor, just not the
people that won't work because they are too lazy or
want to live off the government.
To Arizona Yankee, there is so many reasons the
poor aren't working - because of disability, age, lack of education, the difficult economy, the effects a culture of poverty has on a
person... But you don't really
want to try to understand those reasons, do you?
Typical liberal CNN bias... the hand outs have to stop for those able to work... all these lazy
people that do nt
want to work are
poor at their own doing...
People believe it's the government's job to take care of the
poor because they don't
want to take the blame themselves.
(I
want to make clear from the start that these
poor people aren't wearing the dunce caps by choice, but because the church is attempting to shame them.)
The Muslim thereby samples enough of starvation to make him a warm - hearted, hospitable
person, sympathetic with the
poor who are in constant
want.
They hope that God accepts
people regardless of their sexual or political orientation, who sides with the
poor and the outcast, who doesn't have favorites, and who
wants equality, justice, freedom, and fairness for all.
By the way I am a
poor person, but I get by, me and my family do not need or
want much, just food, clothing and shelter.
If you
want to really help
poor people around the world, if you care about mankind in general, solving the problem of hunger, raising the wellfare of all of us that are not just the ultra rich, then you should go in the opposite direction of supporting ANY republican candidate.
As for the widow's mite, we have praised her devotion a zillion times, but none of us really
wants a whole congregation full of generously self - sacrificing
poor people, do we?
We have done such a
poor job of being an authentic community that humbly seeks truth, loves one another, and unselfishly serves our neighbors, that even if
people want to learn about Jesus, it's hard for them to get past the gatekeepers of the church.
modern day europe: liberal democracies accept
poor people from muslim countries, and what do they
want to do?
That said, part of «the church [being] only too happy to let» the government get involved was that churches only
wanted to serve the deserving
poor:
people with the right social graces,
people who were properly grateful and avoided forms of immorality rejected by the middle class, and frankly,
people who were the right color.
This is going to be a shock — the men who actually wrote all the parts in the Bible and made changes to the infrastructure of Christianity — including Constantine circa 300 AD in Rome — were not afraid of unleashing the occasional metaphor... in other words the Bible is not entirely literal — no, you are supposed to use your imagination... In many cases the disciples didn't actually witness an event — it was long distance and time altered hearsay — God figured Man could handle that... So don't be afraid to dilute - God's cool with that — as long as you do the right thing in life — feed the
poor, help your neighbor, don't kill or covet - just be a good and decent
person - smile, love and give generously... God doesn't need robots — He
wants thoughtful individuals who help!!!
Yes we only
want the type of Christians that send our young
people into war, increase our military budget, increase our national debt & take money from
poor.
Our choice is simply, a president who
wants to 1) increase you taxes and what everyone to pay «more» — coded as «fair share», 2) considers the
poor decisions of one
person to be paid for by others (everything from health care to welfare to immigration) and 3) has repeatedly lied to the american
people (i.e. benghazi).
Nonetheless, he continued to insist that his own view of education was not «elitist» because «It is not elitist to
want to help
poor people make more money.
If it was ok to get rid of the
people that we don't
want then why don't we start with terminating the homeless, the
poor, or those in prison?
I just wonder why they are not fighting just as hard against other forms of «killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent
people have died on death row) the
poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't
want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.
Although they've volunteered in order to do something for the
poor, their paternalism comes apart when they meet articulate
poor people who often believe in God more than they do and who
want a world where North - South relations are characterized by justice rather than charity.