Sentences with phrase «want value for their money»

I want value for my money, I want us to be competitive, I want teams to fear the Arsenal like they used to.

Arsenal fans have to pay over the odds to watch our team or buy some merchandise otr have a drink or something to eat in the ground, so why should we be happy that all our money is just going to sit there because Wenger wants value for money?

If you want value for your money, try supporting the club.

But I want value for my money.

In «Jané Trider Extreme Stroller reviews» when we talk about compatibility then obviously stroller is very much luxuries with attractive look & good features, & if you want value for money then you can go for it if you can compromise with the heavy weight.

So if you want value for your money and if looks and materials are also important to you I definitely wouldn't recommend it... otherwise my baby was - still is happy in it, just I am not when checking how nicely others are manufactured.

It has been given a thorough revision both inside out and with high levels of specification will appeal to customers who want value for money without compromising on quality.»

If you're paying a blog tour company anywhere from $ 600 to $ 1,000, you're going to want value for that money.

In fact, given that indy authors tend to pay editors and proof readers, and want value for money, whereas editors in traditional houses are involved in a large number of projects, and are well - known to spend the bulk of their time in meetings rather than editing, and proofing is contracted out - often to the same proof - readers as many indies use (and some editors care how good it is, and some don't) the standards may well be higher in indy bestsellers.

Obviously you want value for your money, a competitive interest rate and complete transparency on the costs involved, including all fees.

«It's for upscale buyers who want value for their money and still live close to the city.»

Not exact matches

CEOs are caught between penny - pinching customers demanding value for less money and employees wanting more pay for less work.

«I'm sure that you, Joe, want the best value for your money at XYZ Corp. and, Joe, that's important to me, too.»

Companies don't want to just sit on money, much for the same reason that investors don't like holding piles of cash either: Inflation erodes the value of the cash, so putting it to work makes sense.

It's excellent value for the money and it's a title that almost every Xbox 360 owner will probably want.

Most first - time homebuyers will probably want to make a down payment of at least 20 % of their home's total value, especially if they want to avoid paying extra money for private mortgage insurance (PMI).

If for any reason you feel you have not received value for your money within 30 days of purchase, just contact us — giving us your reason (s) for wanting to give up on course — and we will arrange a 100 % refund of your purchase price.

The primary consideration is: Do we want to retain our money, and potentially watch it depreciate in value or do we want to invest some of it now for things we would enjoy long term?

Today I want to review the currency that has no controlling government, but has the value, the value that people are ready to pay for with real fiat money.

When asked what they find most valuable in financial products, 85 % of respondents said one that «provides a source of tax - free income in retirement,» followed by 78 % who value one that «provides tax - free money for family / loved ones» and 68 % who want a product that «provides the ability to use the funds to pay for college.»

When an investor wants their money back, the fund redeems them (exchanges the shares for cash) at the «net asset value» of the fund.

I don't consider myself frugal, I just make sure I get value for money on what I want, I don't buy crap and get the best deal I can on fixed expenses.

«We are really conveying a message that we want people to feel they are getting great value for their money,» Redmer says.

«We want them to leave feeling that the experience, the food quality and the portion they got was an exceptional value for their money.»

At one time, consumers were very price - sensitive and wanted to make sure that they were getting the best possible value for their money.

There is no doubting that luxury brands tend to be over packaged but that's the anomaly, consumers want to get value for money when paying over the odds and expect more from luxury products.

We want to highlight and reward those wines that have the winning combination of drinkability, value for money and that look great too.»

We wanted to take a different approach, by asking our judges to look at beers the way shoppers do, adding appearance and value for money into the mix.

Currently, there is a polarization trend going on in the chocolate market — on the one hand consumers want good value for little money and on the other hand, there is a trend towards best quality and innovation.

with his attitude as if we have to be his servant, get back to Chilie and get those life values back, he is a football player, but a man first, and as a player and man, his all attitude sucks, i don't know why wenger kept him and take that shit, means we have to take it... I told yo before, get his ass on training camp, ruining all day, shut him up, keep him out of the squad, not even in bench to bring his laim superior attitude... All money he is making, he should think of Chilie street and reality for kids he was once... He is in a great city, a club that won in this league and would be in CL as every year without this type of laim ways... So, of course no one wants him around during that ceremony, not even in the room... Get real sanchez, you came from misery, benched for years by gardiola too, sell out, poor minded..

its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d point of being in d «top 10 financially rich clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll buy d odd 30m player but is it enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to buy 2 top 30m signings....

... Not only that but we have to watch them penny pinch in the market, having the audacity to want «value for money»!!!

at every home game please donate a pound or better throw it in Wengers direction he may get 50 to 60 k pounds every home match as they are already looting the fans there.sit on the money and wait for market value to come down wenger.players are there he just does not wan na pay.But we are a small club, wenger is actually proving the likes of fabregas, nasri and van persie that they were right to leave the club cuz all players have ambition to win the league

«The players who want to stay here play for the club with the way we want to play football, and with the values we think are important for us, and with the right amount of money we want to pay them.

I seem to agree that Kawhi's not about the money, that he'd work his ass off in practice and in a game to win for his team... and i doubt Kawhi wants all this attention on him now... but given all these leaks from former players and media sources about leaving SA, getting more money and getting into a bigger media market / shoe deal, that's not Kawhi at all... it has to be something / someone... looking at his camp... logically SAS wouldn't be leaking these unless they are nudging him to leave, and for what, for inevitably way lesser value in whatever trade they get into.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If we want to get value for money, we should look outside EPL.

We typically recommend laying off whenever we have contradicting sharp money indicators, so bettors may want to look elsewhere for value this weekend.

«With wages squeezed and inflation increasing, fans paying out for tickets, club merchandise and TV packages want the most value they can for their money — a weaker pound means that just isn't the case.

Although the stroller is quite expensive, if you want a double stroller that gives you value for your money, look no further, this stroller might just be it.

So look no further simply if you want to savor in the value for your money think Twin Triumph.

This car seat is a good choice for parents who want good quality, value for money, and functionality.

But when it comes down to it there are many aspects to an organizer which all determine its quality, and if it's a good value for money product you want its best to be aware of what makes the best stroller organizer.

This is probably the best value for money choice if you want to buy a tandem stroller.

This is not negligible because it is better to have the value for your money last because you want to spend more money on other things your baby needs.

7) Governments may decide that «smart» spending on intelligence, strategic deterrents and high quality rapid deployment forces is better value for money than vast legions of mediocre mechanised infantry for a hypothetical war which nobody wants.

Only by positioning itself as the party of efficiency, spending cuts where necessary and value for money can Labour turn on the Tories and ask voters: now that we have slimmed down the state, do you want the Tories to cut the basics, too?

«This will mean more open public services, more innovative, more responsive to what people want, and better value for money.

«The public wants cleaner politics and better value for money.

So presumably, the less wealthy, after being told what to spend their money on by «society» for all their working years, reach pensionable age fully moulded by a paternalistic government into financially responsible citizens who will commit a significant amount of their time to research where they want to invest their pensions, and subsequently enjoy «regular updates on how their pension fund was growing» — because of course, like house prices, pension funds can only rise in value.