Support for grammars is strong across all age and income groups with a remarkable 85 % of 18 to 24 year - olds (many of whom will be first - time voters)
wanting more grammar schools.
He wants more grammar schools.
Not exact matches
It also found that
grammar schools were overwhelmingly favoured by those who attended them, with 61 per cent
wanting the government to build
more, compared to 17 per cent who
want them all scrapped.
The poll also found that
grammar schools were overwhelmingly favoured by those who attended them, with 61 per cent
wanting the government to build
more, compared to 17 per cent who
want them all scrapped.
And of course it tended to perpetuate class divisions, as better - off kids with better - educated parents were much
more apt to make it into (and
want to enter) the
grammar schools.
Still others
wanted to ban spelling and
grammar to make
school more fun.
A Department for Education spokesman said: «We know that
grammar schools provide a good education for their disadvantaged pupils, and we
want more pupils from lower - income backgrounds to benefit from that.»
A Department for Education spokesperson said
grammar schools provided «a good education for their disadvantaged pupils», adding: «we
want more pupils from lower income backgrounds to benefit from that».
«Local areas who
want more grammar places should be able to have them and similarly, local areas who
want to stick with the existing
schools that they're happy with will be able to do that too.»
«We know that
grammar schools provide a good education for their disadvantaged pupils, which is why we
want more pupils from lower income backgrounds to benefit from that.»
Kent councillors
want grammar schools to take
more pupils from poorer backgrounds at the expense of children from outside the county
The government
wants to allow successful academies, including
grammar schools, to take on
more pupils and is consulting on changes.
«Pupils in
grammar schools make significantly
more progress relative to their similarly - able peers,» he said, adding that ministers
wanted to ensure that children from disadvantaged backgrounds «have the opportunity to benefit from selective
schools».
«We have set out our proposals to look at introducing
more grammar schools where local communities
want that.»
But both Theresa May and Justine Greening, the education secretary, have claimed they do not
want to see a return to the «binary system» of
grammar schools and secondary moderns of the 1950s, and have unveiled plans to force selective
schools to take
more pupils from poorer backgrounds.
A Department for Education spokesperson said: «The Sutton Trust itself has highlighted the positive impact
grammar schools can have on pupils from less well - off backgrounds and that's exactly why we
want more young people to benefit.
We
want to remove the restrictive regulations that are preventing
more children from going to high - quality faith
schools, and we
want to end the ban on the opening of new
grammar schools.
I do not think that it is tenable in a country that has
grammars and selection for the Opposition to say they do not like that situation, but that they do not
want us to take any steps whatever to see how we can deliver
more strongly on social mobility through the
schools already in place.
The government has already set out plans to make
grammar schools become
more inclusive if they
want cash for expansion, but the agreement with the GSHA is an attempt to encourage selective
schools to change their ways by the end of the parliament in 2022.