No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can
war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.
Not exact matches
That we may, and ought, to resist, and even make
war against those rulers who leap the bounds prescribed them by the
constitution, and attempt to oppress and enslave the subjects, is a principle on which alone the great revolutions which have taken place in our nation can be justified.»
The Iraq Resolution known as «AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE
AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002» cites national policy, a war on «terrorism», and United Nations Security Council Resolutions to justify authorization of military force against Iraq, but I am not aware of any document by which the United States has been legally bound by a declaration of war against Iraq as per the federal Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clau
AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002» cites national policy, a
war on «terrorism», and United Nations Security Council Resolutions to justify authorization of military force
against Iraq, but I am not aware of any document by which the United States has been legally bound by a declaration of war against Iraq as per the federal Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clau
against Iraq, but I am not aware of any document by which the United States has been legally bound by a declaration of
war against Iraq as per the federal Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clau
against Iraq as per the federal
Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11).
The USS
Constitution, Old Ironsides (which back then still hadn't lost its new warship smell) won that battle
against the French (capturing a ship and the fort) in an obscure sea
war that ended 4 months later.
Abuses of the United States
Constitution began with the administration of Abraham Lincoln when they entered into war against other genuine Americans resulting in establishment of a strong central government not authorized by the c
Constitution began with the administration of Abraham Lincoln when they entered into
war against other genuine Americans resulting in establishment of a strong central government not authorized by the
constitutionconstitution.
By sanctioning trials of enemy aliens by military commission for offenses
against the law of
war, Congress recognized the right of the accused to make a defense, and did not foreclose their right to contend that the
Constitution or laws of the United States withhold authority to proceed with the trial.
10, of the
Constitution to «define and punish... Offenses
against the Law of Nations...» of which the law of
war is a part, had, by the Articles of War (10 U.S.C. § § 1471 - 1593), recognized the «military commission» appointed by military command, as it had previously existed in United States Army practice, as an appropriate tribunal for the trial and punishment of offenses against the law of w
war is a part, had, by the Articles of
War (10 U.S.C. § § 1471 - 1593), recognized the «military commission» appointed by military command, as it had previously existed in United States Army practice, as an appropriate tribunal for the trial and punishment of offenses against the law of w
War (10 U.S.C. § § 1471 - 1593), recognized the «military commission» appointed by military command, as it had previously existed in United States Army practice, as an appropriate tribunal for the trial and punishment of offenses
against the law of
warwar.
During the
war against the South many confederate rebels were hung by the military for treason, but whether they were citizens entitled to the protection of the
Constitution is questionable, since they had succeeded from the Union.