Sentences with phrase «war on science»

We have all heard about the Republican war on science; we want to draw attention to the progressive war on reason.
Anyway, what I've been reading this week is The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney.
My thoughts and experiences are summarized in an article on the Subterranean War on Science.
Fundamentalist Christianity has declared war on science, calling it Satan's playground, fabricating hypotheses and fraudulently representing them as science, using school boards to select distorted text books for science classes, etc..
Meanwhile, the Canadian government's continued to wage war on science, often at the expense of the environment.
It stands alongside Chris Mooney's The Republican War on Science as a work of timely muckraking.
«You've got to shift your position away from this very combative war on science sentiment, away from I'm a poor and battled scientist, I'm a poor and battled physician, because you're not.
Patriotic Viral News The conservative war on science clearly destroyed the Earth.
Chris Mooney's Republican War on Science which I plan to review soon, gives chapter and verse and the whole network of thinktanks, politicians and tame scientists who have popularised GW contrarianism, Intelligent Design and so on.
«The Australian's War on Science XV,» Deltoid, July 18, 2008.
There is a great article in the WaPost by Chris Mooney author of the book The Republican War on Science about some of the misleading arguments made by the conservative columnist George Will in his recent editorial about climate change.
I think truth and science are better served by exposing McIntyre's mistakes and his co-operation with a mpolitically motivated war on science.
For more information on how complaints and intimidation are used to attempt to silence scientists and curtail their freedom of scholarly inquiry, see The subterranean war on science and the following video from Denial101x:
Flake called for a billion - dollar cut in the budget of the National Science Foundation (NSF), instantly turning him into a hated figure among US scientists and liberals, a personification of «the Republican war on science».
Message to the GOP: your using of multinational corporations to solve national problems, callous treatment of the poor, war on science will come back to haunt you.
Maverick GOP US Rep. Matt Gaetz, 36, speaking at a meeting of younger members of congress, reports The Hill, said Republicans could appeal to younger voters by ending «our party's war on science,» noting that people don't choose to be gay, that the earth is warming, and that medical marijuana helps some people significantly.......
Mark Largent, 2011 - 12 Executive Branch Fellow at the National Science Foundation, co-organized and spoke at a popular session, «A War on Science?
It also resurrects several initiatives from the last budget of a Liberal government, presented in 2005, before the Conservatives took power under Stephen Harper and launched what many scientists regarded as a «war on science
About this Book: The War on Science: Who's Waging It, Why It Matters, What We Can Do About It Shawn Otto Milkweed Editions, 2016
NEW DELHI — A new front has opened in the war on science in India.
She said that initial resistance within the march's leadership to issuing an internal statement that diversity and inclusion were core values had the effect of weakening the March and its goals by alienating those who stand to lose the most in the War on Science.
The knee - jerk reaction is to decry the YouCut review as an act of philistinism by a party conducting a war on science, and to say that only qualified experts are able to judge whether research dollars are well spent.
In his new book, The War on Science, Shawn Otto documents the modern clash between what he calls the «authoritarians» (governments, large corporations, and religious groups) and the «antiauthoritarians» (scientists and other liberal thinkers).
She says Pres. Donald Trump's administration is carrying out a «war on science» with proposed cuts in scientific research funding and appointments of climate change deniers to top positions.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — If there's a war on science, it's not just one war.
Millstein went further and said stop calling it a war on science with us versus them.
Scientific American editors Mark Fischetti, Dina Maron and Seth Fletcher talk about the info they picked up at the just - concluded annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C. Subjects covered include gravitational waves, whether there's really a war on science, the growing concern over Zika virus, sea level rise and advances in artificial intelligence.
1 — In his book «The Republican War on Science,» Chris Mooney stated that «when scientific information becomes merely something to be manipulated to achieve a political end, the quality and the integrity of the political process inevitably suffer.»
Thus, the push back against his book, «The Republican War on Science» I suggest you look at where that push back came from to see who is doing what for whom.
The war on science and scientists went into high gear when the Bush administration took office in 2000.
Those looking for a polemic (the title of Mooney's previous book, after all, was «The Republican War on Science») will be disapointed.
Chris Mooney, the author of «The Republican War on Science,» credits some facets of Sarewitz's piece but then posits that the only people confronting global warming with blinders on are Republicans.
Do you see any need for the environmental movement to abandon its longstanding claim that the public is inert on climate and energy because of the themes in «Merchants of Doubt» and, to an extent, «The Republican War on Science
The near impossibility of having a productive public discussion on a contentious issue even when there is a lot of science is the subject of «The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science,» an article in Mother Jones by Chris Mooney, the author of The Republican War on Science and the co-author, with Sheril Kirshenbaum, of Unscientific America.
First, this approach does not suggest that my first book (Republican War on Science) was wrong — e.g., there really were all these attacks on science, as you know from having reported on them — but it does suggest that the book did not fully describe motivations and mechanisms, as my Mother Jones piece begins to do.
So I would certainly expect them to file briefs - and, given that Mann sees this as part of a broader «war on science» by well - funded «deniers», I would also expect briefs from the various professional bodies: the National Academy of Sciences, the American Physical Society, etc..
I've participated in several of these, and now I've run one for the first time, on Chris Mooney's The Republican War on Science You can see it here
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z