Sentences with phrase «war with enemy»

Play mechanics involve recon and espionage - based missions where all - out war with the enemy is highly discouraged.

In order to obtain victory you may have to form alliances with friendly tribes and go to war with enemy tribes at the appropriate times.

Maybe in a war with an enemy who is dispersed and covert all of this is justified.

Also, for the first time, Abraham is told that his seed shall be victorious in wars with its enemies — which means, of course, that there will be later need for God - fearing men to sacrifice their sons, this time in battle; in the absence of fathers who are willing to pay such a price, God's way on earth can not survive in the world against its enemies.

This is even more true in the instances where Jesus tells His disciples that rather than go to war with their enemies, they should love their enemies, pray for them, and bless them (cf. Matt 5:43 - 48).

The «journey home» is a journey to America, to normality, except for the abnormality of being almost obsessively at war with the enemies of America and normality.

It's a pity that this game shares the same problems that earlier Total War games have, but managing your empire and engaging in war with enemies will keep you occupied and excited for so long that you won't be bothered with the problems this game has.

Not exact matches

Gary is the author of Playing With The Enemy, the story of his father's remarkable odyssey through World War II and the hardships of his off and on minor league baseball career with the Brooklyn DodgWith The Enemy, the story of his father's remarkable odyssey through World War II and the hardships of his off and on minor league baseball career with the Brooklyn Dodgwith the Brooklyn Dodgers.

A variation of that phrase on a World War II poster cautioned U.S. military personnel to avoid accidentally sharing information with the enemy.

It's like the company has gone from all - out war to sleeping with the enemy.

«Sleeping With The Enemy: Coco Chanel's Secret War,» a 2011 book by historian Hal Vaughan, uses what were at the time newly declassified documents from French and German authorities, to substantiate claims that she committed espionage for the Nazis and was romantically involved with German intelligence officer Baron Hans Günther von DincklWith The Enemy: Coco Chanel's Secret War,» a 2011 book by historian Hal Vaughan, uses what were at the time newly declassified documents from French and German authorities, to substantiate claims that she committed espionage for the Nazis and was romantically involved with German intelligence officer Baron Hans Günther von Dincklwith German intelligence officer Baron Hans Günther von Dincklage.

If the US ever did go to war with the Middle Kingdom, it is unlikely they would supply their enemy with a source of badly needed oilseed.

One thing I found really interesting is that one conclusion the book came to is that these «faith wars» had a direct impact on the fall of the Roman Empire because the gov» t had to deal with the internal struggle and the external enemies had to take a back seat in importance or at least drastically distracted the leadership.

«The brand the «war on terror» creates the illusion,» Northcott writes, «that the United States is engaged in a global war with a range of enemies who include Islamists, anti-globalisation activists, environmental and animal rights activists.»

They could have used this for military advantage in a battle with their long - term enemies, the Medes, but instead it appears that they used it to engineer a lasting peace, because when the darkness interrupted the fighting, they said that the gods were demanding an end to the war.

Because men have difficulty in dealing with paradox and ambiguity, they can not accept the evil in themselves, and so they project it onto others: human enemies (which explains the prevalence of war) or an omnipotent God (which allows them to avoid their own responsibility).

This Kingdom has arrived, not with a trumpet's sound but with a baby's cries, not with the vanquishing of enemies but with the forgiving of them, not on the back of a war horse but on the back of a donkey, not with triumph and a conquest but with a death and a resurrection.

Overlapping with the «just» alternative in early medieval thought, «holy» war or the Crusade differs from the just war (properly so - called) as to cause, last resort, and probable success, and usually with regard to the human dignity of the enemy / infidel.

We humans seem have a fascination with war, battle, bloodshed, violence and killing our enemies, don't we?

a foreigners (Dutch) view; it would be seen as a big laugh but also a disgrace for America if Romney was elected; the Republicans never brought anything good for the USA and the rest of the world; look what Bush did; a huge deficit; a war with the wrong enemy and the Democrats had to clean up the mess again;

His ferocious jingoism during World War I» «He who is not with us, absolutely and without reserve of any kind, is against us, and should be treated as an alien enemy»» stands as an embarrassment for all of us who revere his memory and admire his undoubted, if flawed, greatness.

Pipiteca, gather yourselves together with me in the house of war against your enemies, gather yourselves together with me.19

Amanteca, gather yourselves together with me in the house of war against your enemies, gather yourselves together with me.

When we analyze the past wars with Germany the causes were because we were pig headed, prideful and stubborn before the wars were perpetrated by our perceived enemy, we then went to war with the excuse of self defence and dragged in the rest of the world.

I'm know there are people in war torn countries who meet with their enemy to resolve differences through friendship.

One of their documents contains elaborate directions for the organization of an army to fight against the «Sons of Darkness,» It moves largely in the realms of fantasy, but there is no reason to doubt that these sectaries did look forward to a final war of liberation ending with the triumph of the Jewish people over all their enemies.

Any student of history or literature knows that all the arguments used to defend the genocidal slaughter of one's enemies are the exact same arguments we find in the Bible about why the Israelites went to war with the Canaanites.

Why wage a long, tiring war you might not win when you can take out the enemy with one blow?

The culture war mentality that has made certain segments of the population «enemies» of Christianity (labeled with words like «liberal,» «secular,» or «worldly»), not only lacks nuance to understand why others believe what they believe, but it also makes neighbors into combatants.

Here's the problem with fighting a culture war: Every war needs an enemy.

Loving our enemies and returning evil with good has the power to accomplish things that the weapons of war can never dream of.

In The War for Muslim Minds, Gilles Kepel, a French Arabist and scholar of Islam, shows little patience for neoconservative U.S. foreign policy, but most of the book is taken up with criticism of the chief enemy of Muslim reform in Europe: jihadist ideology imported from Saudi Arabian Wahhabism, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Qutb brothers (Sayyid and Muhammad) and like - minded sources.

As I have said much is to be discerned in this book, for it has been tampered with by the enemies in Exodus 17 vs. 14 - 16 as prophesied it would from generation to generation, the spiritual war until this day.

«smashing babies like in the psalms «Psalm 137, you didn't read that either did you?It deals with the realities of war, and the enemies of Jerusalem who committed those kinds of acts upon Jewish children.The psalm is a lament and a cry for revenge and justice.A far cry from an endorsement, as you would have people believe.

The radicals» war begins by dividing society into the politically chosen and the morally condemned, and ends with the total annihilation of the social enemy, which will usher in a millennium of social peace.

Preachers did not compete with each other, as during the First World War, to produce the most vile denunciations of the enemy.

God had promised at Mt. Sinai to protect Israel and that He would be at war for them in every generation with their enemies, and especially against the Amalekites (Exod 17:8 - 16).

Hostility creates hatred and contempt; the necessity of either killing or being killed obliterates humaneness; and even those who in times of peace have been cosmopolitans, with international interest and goodwill, become under the spell of war intense group - loyalists with no sense of moral obligation to the enemy.

This god of war, with his relentless hatred of his people's enemies, was even supposed to be pleased by the sacrifice of prisoners taken in battle.

The rest support unnecessary mass - murder and torture for profit based on lies as in the War of Choice in Iraq in direct contradiction to the spirit and literal teachings of Jesus (turn the other cheek, blessed are the peacemakers, love your enemies, repay evil with good, he who lives by the sword will die by the sword, forgive seventy times seven, thou shalt not kill, etc.).

Then through all of the vicissitudes of actual life in the ancient Near East, God made himself a people from those forebears — delivering them from slavery in Egypt, protecting them against their enemies, leading them through the terrors of the wilderness, entering into covenant with them, giving them his guiding presence in the covenant law, bringing them into a land flowing with milk and honey, giving them a Davidic king to be their protector of justice in peace and in war, and finally taking up his own dwelling in their temple on the Mount of Zion.

Similarly, near the start of this century, Berry had challenged the left with his essay «The Failure of War,» offering stirring words about the humanity of an unborn «baby» — whom he called «an innocent fellow human,» not «an enemy - in - the - womb.»

To rush into the flames of this hellish world and rescue their friends with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and to free their friends who are Satan's prisoner's of war, locked in chains behind enemy lines.

Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series originally dealt with questions of sacrifice, just war, and love for others, and, beginning in The Blood of the Fold, portrays enemies that can possess anyone who does not truthfully pledge allegiance to the Messiah - figure.

During the war they sent a petition to the Virginia Government stating that «at a time when this colony, with others, is contending for the civil rights of mankind, against the enslaving schemes of a powerful enemy... the strictest unanimity is necessary among ourselves.»

When men march off to war, it is with prayers on their lips that their god will see the righteousness of their cause against the unrighteousness of the evil enemies.

Remember, the Persian Gulf War was fought against an enemy with little battlefield ADA (opposite of soviet doctrine, which called for one ADA vehicle per every 10 combat vehicles), and using cheap copies of the export models of russian tanks.

I think most of the problem with this is many of the wars we have been in, the civilians are definitely NOT enabling the enemy fighters.

Definitions vary according to the size of the window that constitutes life, (when it starts and stops), its quality or relative value as measured by those in power, (i.e. slaves regarded as half - people, uncharismatic mutations, the sick and aged, outsiders, outlaws, enemies, militarily weaker populations with confiscatable possessions, those with «fates worse than death», et al), and whose lives, (responsibility for all of a wars» deaths might be attributed to the defeated).

(7) it is REDACTED consistent with U.S. law and the laws of war for the Secretary of Defense to detain Mr. Padilla as enemy combatant.