The title given to a minor who is the subject of
a wardship order.
The appellant mother appealed a Crown
wardship order in respect of three of her children, arguing that she had been inadequately represented by her trial counsel and that the children should have been placed with the maternal grandmother (who was herself, at the time of trial, involved in ongoing proceedings with child protection authorities vis - a-vis her own children).
CAS v. A.F. was yet another unsuccessful parent appeal of a Crown
wardship order, summarily dismissed.
Children's Aid Society of Toronto v. L.T. concerned the dismissal of an appeal of a Crown
wardship order for delay.
At the hearing below, she had requested a Crown
wardship order that was silent as to access so that if at some point in the future her 10 - year old son wanted to see her, he could.
Not exact matches
There is no such thing as a care
order for adults and the jurisdiction is not to be equated with the jurisdiction of family courts under the Children Act 1989 or the
wardship jurisdiction of the High Court (para 24).
This was a mother's appeal of a Crown
wardship no access
order.
The appellant also argued that the trial judge should have extended CAS
wardship rather than make a Crown ward no access
order.
[It is somewhat unclear why the appellant made the s. 15 (3) argument before the ONCA, as a statutory breach would not, in itself, justify the setting aside of the Crown
wardship no access
order.
This was a self - rep appeal of a Crown
wardship no access
order.
To seek
orders in
wardship to protect a named young person (who is the subject of proceedings) from undesirable associations is relatively common and was done here
L.G. and D.D. involved two unsuccessful appeals of Crown
wardship no access
orders, whereas Bryce is an unsuccessful domestic appeal by a self - rep.
The Society was seeking an
Order of Crown
wardship with... Read more