Sentences with phrase «warm interval on»

«In the last warm interval on Earth (called the Eemian), global temperatures were likely only +0.2 or +0.3 degrees Celsius warmer than today (+1 degrees maximum), and sea level was +5 to +9 meters higher.

Not exact matches

While the meat and vegetables are grilling, heat up the tortillas (This can be done on a stove top or in the microwave by wrapping the tortillas in a damp towel and microwaving in short intervals until they are warm and pliable).

Microwave on high in 1 - minute intervals until warm.

Microwave in 1 - minute intervals until warm, or reheat in a pan on stovetop.

If a microwave is your only option I would cook it on 30 second intervals (stirring each time) until it is warmed through.

Option 1: come back in 10 - minute intervals to turn the oven off, then back on warm, then back off, then back on warm, and so on.

Uncover each arm and wash it, all the while keeping them warm by pouring water on their body at different intervals.

It also has a few terrific features that I'm really grooving on, not the least of which are three interval programs, each with 16 customizable intervals (you can even name them: warm - up, fast, slow, etc.).

For just over a year, I have spent nearly every Wednesday night and Saturday morning running a warm up pace that makes me overheat, then starting the interval workout which involves me sometimes running slower than the «warm up pace «and watching the lithe people run away from me at incredible speeds, then «slinky - ing «forward while they run back for me on the recovery, watching them sprint away from me some more, and then eventually finding myself labouring up a hill to exit the river valley at the end of the workout to find the group of speedsters waiting to fist pound it out before we run back to the shop at a cool down pace which only makes me sweat even more.

Carefully turn the bag and continue to warm in 30 second intervals on low until white chocolate chips are melted.

For example, an interval training session on the treadmill could look something like this: Warm - up for 3 - 4 minutes at a fast walk or light jog

On the other hand, weight training, plyometrics, or sprint intervals, a more in - depth warm - up is required.

The basic picture is the same — 2008 is a cool anomaly on the back of a warming trend and is very analogous to similar cool anomalies that occur in the models at random intervals.

In contrast, the only interval in the GISS or NCDC global time series that looks odd is during the WWII years between 1941 and 1945, where it appears that all the temperatures have a warming bias of 0.1 C. I agree with J.J.Kennedy that it is an artificial shift based on war - time procedures, but I think the corrections that Hadley made post-WWII were questionable.

Below you'll hear from scientists with significant concerns about keystone sections of the paper — on the evidence for «superstorms» in the last warm interval between ice ages, the Eemian, and on the pace at which seas could rise and the imminence of any substantial uptick in the rate of coastal inundation.

-- we show no statistically significant warming for the continent as a whole over 1957 - 2006 (our finding is 0.06 ± 0.08 degrees C / decade, using a standard 95 % confidence interval; I state all subsequent trends on this basis), whereas S09 showed statistically significant warming of 0.12 ± 0.08.

Mark — What are your thoughts about the analysis by Ramanathan and Feng (PNAS, Sept 17,2008: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803838105), in which they calculate the committed warming of cumulative emissions since the pre-industrial era as in the region of 2.4 °C (with a confidence interval of 1.4 °C to 4.3 °C), based on calculating the equilibrium temperature if GHG concentrations are held at 2005 levels into the future.

And there are plenty of important questions to resolve about the climate of the Holocene — this comfy warm interval humans have enjoyed since the end of the last ice age — before the human influence on the system built in recent decades.

At the same time you harp on disagreements among the surface measures even though they all agree within the same confidence intervals,, and all show significant warming consistent with IPCC estimates.

There were many ups and downs, but they had little effect on the overall warming of about 0.5 — 0.6 C calculated for the entire interval (compare the black line with the individual red and blue bars)..

If there are implications, I believe they should be specified by identifying the post-1950 warming influences in addition to anthropogenic ghgs and citing quantitative data on their greater net strength over the entire course of the interval.

Geologists can prove global warming has been occurring here on this planet at regular 1,500 year intervals for more than six million years.

Given the heat storage changes (Fig. 7), the imbalance is presumably a warming one on average during the studied interval.

''... worked with two sediment cores they extracted from the seabed of the eastern Norwegian Sea, developing a 1000 - year proxy temperature record «based on measurements of δ18O in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, a planktonic foraminifer that calcifies at relatively shallow depths within the Atlantic waters of the eastern Norwegian Sea during late summer,» which they compared with the temporal histories of various proxies of concomitant solar activity... This work revealed, as the seven scientists describe it, that «the lowest isotope values (highest temperatures) of the last millennium are seen ~ 1100 - 1300 A.D., during the Medieval Climate Anomaly, and again after ~ 1950 A.D.» In between these two warm intervals, of course, were the colder temperatures of the Little Ice Age, when oscillatory thermal minima occurred at the times of the Dalton, Maunder, Sporer and Wolf solar minima, such that the δ18O proxy record of near - surface water temperature was found to be «robustly and near - synchronously correlated with various proxies of solar variability spanning the last millennium,» with decade - to century - scale temperature variability of 1 to 2 °C magnitude.»

«The authors write that «the Mediterranean region is one of the world's most vulnerable areas with respect to global warming,»... they thus consider it to be extremely important to determine what impact further temperature increases might have on the storminess of the region... produced a high - resolution record of paleostorm events along the French Mediterranean coast over the past 7000 years... from the sediment bed of Pierre Blanche Lagoon [near Montpellier, France]... nine French scientists, as they describe it, «recorded seven periods of increased storm activity at 6300 - 6100, 5650 - 5400, 4400 - 4050, 3650 - 3200, 2800 - 2600, 1950 - 1400, and 400 - 50 cal yr BP,» the latter of which intervals they associate with the Little Ice Age.

If, on the other hand, the differences between station means and station offsets show large variance because different stations have warmed differently between baseline and observation intervals, then the last term will greatly increase the estimated data variance.

On the other hand, the trend of the 21st century is 0, which is twice the rate of certain selected previous intervals that had a warming rate of 0.

In contrast, some global warming advocates maintain that analysis of the MWP adds little to the climate debate, since the climate variability of the interval can be explained by changes in large - scale climate patterns, such as El Niño / Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the NAO, rather than by changes brought on by human beings.

All it gives is an eyeball comparison of spatial colour maps for the 1901 - 2010 intervals, and later on the same page notes that the similarity is not as good for the 1979 - 2010 interval, with evidence of model over-prediction of warming in a number of areas.

If you look at this chart and notice where the excess warming and cooling regions occur, they happen to map to the two extreme intervals on the profile of «greater than 0.1 km ^ 3» volcanic eruptions.

The expected ALL warming, based on climate models only, is \ -LRB-[+0.74 \) K \ -LRB-, +0.86 \) K](90 % confidence interval).

The trend in peak hottest years starting in 1998 and continuing on through 2005, 2010, and now 2014 is roughly 0.1 C per decade, as is illustrated in the graphic shown below, which is an adaption of the Ed Hawkins graphic referenced by David Apell several weeks ago in a comment he posted in response to the «Spinning the «warmest year»» article... As shown in the above graphic, if a trend of peak hottest years starts in 1998 and is then extrapolated at a rate of +0.1 C per decade out to the year 2035, the extrapolated trend just skirts the lower boundary of the model ensemble range interval described by IPPC AR5 RCP (all 5 - 95 % range).

The presence of multidecadal internal variability superimposed on the secular trend gives the appearance of accelerated warming and cooling episodes at roughly regular intervals.

The ROW trend is much different than the US trends: the most interesting result of this will (in my opinion) be, not so much a major revision of US temperature history where one already has pretty warm 1930s (but there will be an effect there), but the information on variations in trends resulting from site quality differences than need to be included in ROW calculations and confidence interval calculations.

Each of the points on my graph has a 99 % confidence interval, also the average warming rate has a 99 % confidence interval.