Sentences with phrase «warm period seems»

The other obvious point is that when we compare these to the current instrumental temperature record, the Medieval Warm Period seems to be about 0.7 degrees C cooler than the 2000 - 2010 mean temperature.

It is only for the urban stations that the recent warm period seems «unusually warm».

This makes the recent warm period seem much hotter than the earlier warm period.

If a researcher chooses to use the Esper version then it will make the Medieval Warm Period seem warmer than the Current Warm Period.

Just looking temperature over last 10,000 years, the warming periods seems to generally last longer than cooling periods, so perhaps house odds, favor continuing warming.

This makes the recent warm period seem warmer than the 1930s warm period in the Fully adjusted dataset.

The current warming period seems to have peaked and all indicators are that another short term cooling period is in the works.

Not exact matches

They suggested this based on paleoclimate data from the Eemian period, when one degree of warming seems to have done just that.

When he lined up their ages with global climate records, he noticed a pattern: Many species of megafauna seemed to disappear during a period of extreme warming around 12,300 years ago, Cooper and his team write today in Science Advances.

«There seems to be a limit on how strong these ancient storms might be, but the number getting close to the limit appears to be larger during warmer periods,» Korty explains.

In green turtles, the lines seem to reflect periods when seas are colder and body temperatures are consequently lower, prompting the turtles to haul out on beaches to warm in the sun.

Lord Monckton really wants the Medieval Warm Period to have been warmer than today, and will latch onto any piece of «evidence» that seems to support this.

It seems likely that ozone depletion contributed to the major extinctions that took place during these warm global periods.

Although Easter seems to be one of the most popular periods for visitors, I personally believe that the warmest months (November to February) are the most pleasant in Dulleez... when its hellish hot anywhere else!

The Earth currently does seem to be in a warming period, though how warm and for how long no one knows.

I could even use the data you supply to argue it the other way — that is, the two minima you compare seem quite different, yet both» 96 - ’97 and» 07 - ’08 are pretty hot periods globally, with 2007 for instance just a few hundredths of a degree warmer than ’97 in HadCRUT.

They do go down a bit (to the mid 270's ppm) right through 1600 and 1700's so these tiny changes do seem to correlate a bit with the warm and cool periods possibly.

It seems likely that ozone depletion contributed to the major extinctions that took place during these warm global periods.

That the noise of natural variability can temporarily be strong enough to make the underlying warming signal seem to «disappear» for short periods is nothing new.

Given the total irrelevance of volcanic aerosols during the period in question, the only very modest effect of fossil fuel emissions and the many inconsistencies governing the data pertaining to solar irradiance, it seems clear that climate science has no meaningful explanation for the considerable warming trend we see in the earlier part of the 20th century — and if that's the case, then there is no reason to assume that the warming we see in the latter part of that century could not also be due to either some as yet unknown natural force, or perhaps simply random drift.

Now, how about the Holocene — including the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period that seem to figure so prominently in many skeptics» tracts?

The Mann reconstruction appears much flatter than other reconstructions before 1900, and it seems that NAS see pretty good evidence for a «Little Ice Age» and reasonable evidence for a «Medieval Warm Period» (though they think it's plausible that the last 25 years were warmer than any comparable period during the last 1100 yPeriod» (though they think it's plausible that the last 25 years were warmer than any comparable period during the last 1100 yperiod during the last 1100 years).

This leads to the intriguing fact that the warming in The Netherlands seems to be limited to a very short period between 1987 and the early 90 - ies.

It seems likely to me that the level warming we have had in many periods of this interglacial period are likely to occur again in the future centuries: And it seems during most the current of the interglacial temperatures have as warm or warmer than current temperatures, therefore it seems as warmer or warmer is most likely.

In this light paleo research is very important too — as indeed when one looks at high - CO2 warm periods (for instance in the Tertiary) some data seems to suggest a climate sensitivity that would be somewhat higher than the IPCC range.

It seems that the Earth's climate varies between periods of natural global warming and natural global cooling, regardless of what us humans are doing...

There seems to have been a period of global warming during the 1910s - 1940s, and before that, a period of global cooling during the late 19th century.

The recent warm period doesn't seem at all unusual.

Though the current outbreak is happening during an unusual period of extreme warmth, Romanovsky says that, «if it gets warmer in the future, and it seems like it will, the thawing permafrost could be massive.»

However, this effect seems not to be strong enough to prevent CO2 rising during a warm period in the ice ages.

The Oort minimium steps out of line as the line up goes out of sync, the planets do nt quite come back exactly the same each 179 yrs and it seems from the Wolf until now is a window of line ups that might take 1000's of years to return, during the medieval warm period J+S were poorly aligned as the phase gradually shifted.

It seems to me that a common mistake, is the assumption that since our current interglacial began with periods of very rapid warming, that somehow indicates that rapid warming is currently possible.

The DECC used to show the actual temp data CET data set graph (still only 150 years of it) on the DECC website, but following Phil Jones stating in that BBC interview, 3 similar warming periods, and rates of warming in the last 150 years and that you could clearly see this on the graph, the pronouncement by the DECC that this graph showed «unprecedented» man made global warming, seemed ridiculous.

I am an ACC adherent, a «lukecoldist», and it seems likely that she is in a period of multi-decadal cooling; I distinctly recall much warmer winters in days gone by, and new lows in temperature seem more frequent than statistically likely.

There was no warming or even a slight cooling over the second half of the 19C and between (roughly) 1940 and 1975, those would seem to me to be long enough periods to say that the previous upward tends had come to an end.

That might seem small in the scheme of things, but it's a rate of warming 15 times faster than at any period in the last 10,000 years,»

Poor Lolwot seem to have fallen for his own strawman — misrepresenting the obvious observation that warming has stopped for 16 years, into a claim that it has stopped period.

Much of this seemed to have occurred during the cold periods rather than the warm interludes.

So, again, it seems that the 1930s warm period was at the very least comparable to the recent warm period.

We can't even seem to get straight whether or not there was a Mideval warm period, much less understand the last glacial maximum.

Whether CO2 levels are high or low, as long as we are in an interglacial period it seems entirely reasonable that the oceans will continue to warm.

However the basic question of runaway global warming seems countered by the fact that the planet has sustained life for 4.5 billion years, despite periods in the past when CO2 levels were many times higher than they are now.

For the sake of argument, it seems plausible that the late Holocene accumulation near B221v was less than the 135 other sites and has wasted away more quickly during the modern warm period, so that we're now seeing ice in this area more or less as it was in the later Holocene, when over 100 meters had eroded, but there was still something left.

This data seems to suggest modern warming stronger than that seen in the medieval periods displayed (see figure 2): «Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate»

Many «skeptics» seem to want to litigate the medieval warm period in the Steyn and / or Ball cases.

It seems that temperatures in the Arctic naturally alternate between periods of warming and periods of cooling.

Although there has been some global warming in recent decades, it followed a period of global cooling, and temperatures seem to have been comparable in the 1930s and 1940s.

Current GCM models may have realistic - seeming weather patterns, but are totally incapable of producing phenomena that look like the Holocene (Little Ice Age, Medieval Warm Period, Roman Warm Period, Holocene Optimum, the steady decline of temperature on average over the last 3,000 years, etc.) The Climate Science community has, instead, taken the path of trying to claim that these swings didn't occur (Michael Mann's «Hockey Stick», etc.) This does not give me a lot of confidence in the rest of their «science».

Before the 1940s - 1970s Arctic cooling, there also seems to have been another warming period (1900s - 1930s).

In other words, global temperatures seem to alternate between periods of global warming and periods of global cooling, lasting several decades.