Sentences with phrase «warm reviews last»

It's clear that the folks behind the scenes listened to what the fans wanted after The Purge received luke - warm reviews last year.

Not exact matches

A peer reviewed paper admits that surface temps haven't warmed in the last decade.

Advance word on Have A Nice Day has been good; the film received warm reviews and picked up a share of awards when it played festivals last year.

Related Reviews: Directed by Steve Pink: Hot Tub Time Machine • About Last Night (2014) Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure • Grosse Pointe Blank • Horrible Bosses 2 • Grown Ups 2 • The Hangover Part II Rob Corddry: Warm Bodies • Hell Baby Craig Robinson: This Is the End Clark Duke: A Thousand Words Adam Scott: A.C.O.D. • Friends with Kids • Step Brothers • Piranha Chevy Chase: Lovesick • Caddyshack New: The Cobbler • Focus • Jupiter Ascending • Strange Magic • The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water

Last month, my Fordham Institute colleagues released a report that gives a warm review to EngageNY, a comprehensive, Common Core - aligned curriculum developed by New York State for its seven hundred - odd school districts.

On balance if you look at all the things the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the body of experts convened by the United Nations to advise governments in responding to global warming] has been doing over the last number of years, they were trying very hard to put in all the peer - reviewed serious stuff.

To get an idea of why it's important to have icebreakers even in a warming world, review our 2005 series, «The Big Melt» and the series of posts here last year on Arctic shipping efforts.

«Not a single paper in a large sample of peer - reviewed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 refuted the consensus position, summarized by the National Academy of Sciences, that «most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.

Following up on my post from last week on the Arctic Oscillation, Ken Chang has written a Week in Review story with a bit more detail on the unusual atmospheric patterns behind the big, but very constrained, chill, and the dominance of warm conditions — just not where a lot of Western media are situated.

Those who rail against the media for including too many voices of doubt in some stories on global warming science and policy might want to step back a minute and review the chart below, from last December, showing just how invisible coverage of climate is compared to the stories that make the cut each day.

Solar activity has been the highest in the previous 4 centuries: http://www.climate4you.com/images/SolarIrradianceReconstructedSince1610%20LeanUntil2000%20From2001dataFromPMOD.gif The empirical data from peer reviewed science, Hatzianastassiou (2005), Goode (2007), Pinker (2005), Herman (2013), McLean (2014), shows that during the last 2 decades of the 20th century when most of the late 20th century warming occurred, the amount of solar radiation reaching the earth's surface increased by 2.7 W / m ² to 6.8 W / m ².

There's a lot in there, but, the authors write, the compilation of peer - reviewed scientific observations and models together «tell an unambiguous story: the planet is warming, and over the last half century, this warming has been driven primarily by human activity.»

Pingback: Another Peer - Reviewed Paper Predicting the Cessation of Global Warming Will Last At Least Another Decade Deft News

Pingback: Another Peer - Reviewed Paper Predicting the Cessation of Global Warming Will Last At Least Another Decade Bob Tisdale — Climate Observations

January 2018... in 122 (2017) scientific papers Image Source: Loisel et al., 201 2017: 150 Graphs, 122 Scientific Papers In the last 12 months, 150 graphs from 122 peer - reviewed scientific papers have been published that undermine the popularized conception of a slowly cooling Earth temperature history followed by a dramatic hockey - stick - shaped uptick, or an especially unusual global - scale warming during modern times.

Earlier last year, following an article reviewing 6 (also alarmist) books on the environment including Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, Nicholas Stern's report, and George Monbiot's Heat, we discovered that, inconveniently, May had taken a few liberties with the facts himself, citing a single study, referenced in the Stern Report to make the claim that» 15 — 40 per cent of species «were vulnerable to extinction at just 2 degrees of warming, and that oil companies were responsible for a conspiracy to spread misinformation, and prevent action on climate change.

The journal Science, which is peer reviewed up the wazoo, has an interesting new study purporting to explain the 17 - year «pause» in global warming, and, indeed, predicting how long it's likely to continue: The «pause» in global warming may last another decade before surface temperatures start rising again, according to scientists.

The latest attack on global warming consensus comes from Dennis Avery and Fred Singer who claim to have found 500 peer reviewed papers refuting that the last few decades of global warming are primarily anthropogenic.

Followed by: «Researchers examining the recently released data from HadCRU centre's Dr Phil Jones have found that the series showing warming last century has been based on cherry picked data, and adjustments made by Dr Jones that have never been subjected to independent peer review or audit.

In their review of papers that found a hiatus in global warming and were published between 2009 and 2014, Lewandowsky and colleagues found no consistent definition of such a pause nor agreement on when it began or how long it lasted.

Peer reviewed literature supports the three most recent warming periods in the last 10,000 years as being as warm or warmer then the current warm period The NH and global drop in T from the late 1940s to 1979 or so was a well established part of the record.

Headline: Alarmist Claims Deflated — Review of US Temperature Data Shows Very Little Warming for Last 30 Years

Now climate scientists project that we risk up to 10 times as much warming this century as in the last 50 years — with many devastating consequences from dramatic sea level rise to Dust - Bowlification (see my review of more than 60 recent studies).

As for the cause, last year, Time reported on a comprehensive new review paper of «100 peer - reviewed post-IPCC studies» in an article titled, «Report: The Case for Global Warming Stronger Than Ever»

All this may be set to change though, reading the New York Times review of The Last Winter certainly suggests to us that this may be a powerful global warming morality tale:

I say the AR5 is a «partial» review that is «hopefully» the last because, like every IPCC report, it is an instantly out - of - date snapshot that lowballs future warming because it continues to ignore large parts of the recent literature and omit what it can't model.