Not exact matches
Those weather patterns are linked to
warmer surface temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans,
respectively, and correlated with the timing of observed floods on the lower Mississippi.
These values represent, in terms of fluxes, the
warming of the
surface + troposphere and stratosphere,
respectively, in response to the instantaneous forcings combined with inter-layer flux changes.
This is influenced by cold water pushing towards the equator in the Peruvian and Californian Currents
respectively and displacing the
warm surface layer.
El Niño and La Niña years were classifed as those with MEI values of greater than 0.5 and less than -0.5,
respectively (which correspond to
warming or cooling effects of ~ 0.04 °C or more on the annual global
surface temperature anomaly, according to Foster & Rahmstorf).
It is characterized by variations in the temperature of the
surface of the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean —
warming or cooling known as El Niño and La Niña
respectively
It doesn't show an asymmetry in the respective
surface cooling /
warming potential of La Nina / El Nino events,
respectively.
A generally
warmer or cooler sea
surface in the northern Pacific and greater frequency and intensity of El Niño or La Niña
respectively.
«For the doubled CO2 and the 2 % solar irradiance forcings, for which the direct no - feedback responses of the global
surface temperature are 1.2 ° and 1.3 °C,
respectively, the ~ 4 °C
surface warming implies respective feedback factors of 3.3 and 3.0 (5).»
CO2 intercepts and absorbs this energy and now CO2
warms up
respectively and therefore begins to increase it's radiation, — half of which (estimates may vary) returns to the
surface and is now near to the end of it's first circuit.