Models with more expansive climatological Hadley cells tend to
warm this region less or not at all, and tend to have relatively lower climate sensitivities.
Not exact matches
«Under climate change, the Pacific Islands
region is projected to become
warmer,
less oxygenated, more acidic, and have lower production of plankton that form the base of oceanic food webs,» said lead author Rebecca Asch, Nereus Program alumnus and Assistant Professor at East Carolina University.
If grasslands worldwide behave as in the experiment, C4 grasslands — found in
warm, dry
regions — may absorb more CO2 than thought, while more abundant C3 plants could soak up
less.
There is some speculation that global
warming could, via a shutdown or slowdown of the thermohaline circulation, trigger localised cooling in the North Atlantic and lead to cooling, or
lesser warming, in that
region.
Global
warming is desiccating the
region in two ways: higher temperatures that increase evaporation in already parched soils, and weaker winds that bring
less rain from the Mediterranean Sea during the wet season (November to April).
First of all,
less sea ice is forming in the
region, and secondly, oceanographic recordings from the continental shelf break confirm that the
warm water masses are already moving closer and closer to the ice shelf in pulses,» says Dr Hartmut Hellmer, an oceanographer at the AWI and first author of the study.
On the other hand, if the ice shell is sufficiently thick, the
less intense interior heat can be transferred to
warmer ice at the bottom of the shell, with additional heat generated by tidal flexing of the
warmer ice which can slowly rise and flow as do glaciers do on Earth; this slow but steady motion may also disrupt the extremely cold, brittle ice at the surface to produce the chaos
regions.
In his seminal 1982 book Climate, History, and the Modern World, the renown climatologist Dr. H.H. Lamb revealed that sea ice in the subarctic and Arctic
regions was much
less extensive during the Medieval
Warm Period (9th - 13th centuries) compared to today.
The blight followed a much earlier and
less - publicized devastation, when a form of root rot that thrived in
warmer climates killed many American chestnut trees in the Piedmont
region of the Carolinas in the mid-1800s.
However, models do not get quite the same distribution of
warming seen in the observations; the observations tend to show
less tropospheric
warming and more stratospheric cooling in tropical
regions (e.g. 20 South to 20 North).
I wonder, e.g., if during the LGM there were much
less forests than today, perhaps in a
warmer future climate more of the higher latitude tundra
regions will be covered by forest.
In the case of this summer, to make it familiar, the NE North American Coast and most of Canada is cooler by extensive periods of cloud coverage, cooling caused by this
region clashes with the US South extreme heat, given
less bouts of clouds up North, the North American
warming record would have been amazingly strong, but permanent cloud episodes over one
region or another travel, never last forever, as such not causing a permanent shift in the temperature record (unless the clouds cover or not wide swats of the Polar
regions).
Also, as Harte showed, species selected for a
warmer climate sequester
less carbon, so the amount of carbon stored in biota will decrease, at least in Alpine
regions.
Since 1970 we have seen exactly what global
warming models predict — more rainfall in the North - West and some desert areas and
less in the major agricultural
regions.
Greater
warming over land and in the Arctic
regions, and
less warming in the sub-polar oceans, are what we expect from our understanding of climate physics, and this is what we observe.»
Research indicates that the Arctic had substantially
less sea ice during this period compared to present Current desert
regions of Central Asia were extensively forested due to higher rainfall, and the
warm temperate forest belts in China and Japan were extended northwards West African sediments additionally record the «African Humid Period», an interval between 16,000 and 6,000 years ago when Africa was much wetter due to a strengthening of the African monsoon While there do not appear to have been significant temperature changes at most low latitude sites, other climate changes have been reported.
They find about 0.25 °C
less Arctic
warming during the past decade than in the GISS analysis, a difference that they attribute to our method of interpolating and extrapolating data, especially into the Arctic Ocean
regions where no station data are available.
As the earth
warms, we expect to see currently wet
regions receiving more rainfall, and dry
regions receiving
less, although there will be exceptions,» Stocker said.
Global
warming's crystal ball is clearing as climate models improve, and scientists now predict that some
regions will see a month's
less rain and snow by 2100.
1) Due to the short atmospheric lifetime of tropospheric sulfates, if their cooling effect was so large we would observe cooling or, at the very least,
less warming over the emitting areas and downwind from them, especially China and some Eastern European
regions.
«Glaciers in higher colder mountainous
regions will be slower to melt even as temps rise, the lower tundra areas will respond more quickly to such changes and this is shown by the quicker responses in tree line to the
lesser warming periods like the MWP at ground level further north from him, and not just fossil remains but old farming settlements uncovered, and so on.»
With some exceptions, the tropics will likely receive
less rain (orange) as the planet
warms, while the polar
regions will receive more precipitation (green).
Because it is compressed into the
warmest region, biodiversity currently appears to be limited by
less then optimal, too cool temps.
But on the other hand, according to the study, the so - called «dynamical» influence of
warming will alter that basic assumption and instead cause more rain in some
regions and
less or no rain in others.
One study estimates that there are likely to be places on Earth where unprotected humans without cooling mechanisms, such as air conditioning, would die in
less than six hours if global average surface temperature rises by about 12.6 ° F (7 ° C).16 With
warming of 19.8 - 21.6 ° F (11 - 12 ° C), this same study projects that
regions where approximately half of the world's people now live could become intolerable.7
And, in fact, the data shown at CO2science provide evidence for exactly the reason why the current warmth ends up being
less extreme than the modern warmth: For the modern warmth, the
warming of different
regions is largely in synch.
«The dramatic changes in lake ice may also contribute to further
warming of the entire
region, because open water on lakes contributes to
warmer air temperatures, albeit to a
lesser extent than open seawater,» Surdu said.
The fact that people have such discussions with a straight face at the same time as they can not actually say which
regions will be
warmer, cooler, wetter, drier, more extreme,
less extreme (i.e. provide people with some kind of advice on what to plan for at a scale relevant to investment decisions) it quite incredible to me.
Here's the abstract: Analyses of maximum temperature data from 49 stations in Nepal for the period 1971 — 94 reveal
warming trends after 1977 ranging from 0.068 to 0.128 C yr21 in most of the Middle Mountain and Himalayan
regions, while the Siwalik and Terai (southern plains)
regions show
warming trends
less than 0.038 C yr21.
To be sure, he mentions that a
warmer UK will be
less unpleasant than the torrid conditions elsewhere in the world (resulting in «climate refugees» to the UK from these
regions).
In other words, under solar or anthropogenic influence the changes in mean climate values, such as the global temperature, are
less important than increased duration of certain climate patterns associated say with cold conditions in some
regions and
warm conditions in the other
regions
Polar bears are one of the most sensitive Arctic marine mammals to climate
warming because they spend most of their lives on sea ice.35 Declining sea ice in northern Alaska is associated with smaller bears, probably because of
less successful hunting of seals, which are themselves ice - dependent and so are projected to decline with diminishing ice and snow cover.36, 37,38,39 Although bears can give birth to cubs on sea ice, increasing numbers of female bears now come ashore in Alaska in the summer and fall40 and den on land.41 In Hudson Bay, Canada, the most studied population in the Arctic, sea ice is now absent for three weeks longer than just a few decades ago, resulting in
less body fat, reduced survival of both the youngest and oldest bears, 42 and a population now estimated to be in decline43 and projected to be in jeopardy.44 Similar polar bear population declines are projected for the Beaufort Sea
region.45
You have no grounds for assuming this unless you can produce temperature data evidence that the most predominant greenhouse gas water vapour makes moist
regions considerably
warmer than dry
regions where there may be
less than 25 % as much water vapour.
CO2 saves water, grows more food on
less water, makes t
warmer at night reducing frost damage, supposedly
warms the polar
regions more then the tropics and sub tropics, creating
less energy to drive extreme weather.
The winds are probably
less efficient in that regard than the ocean currents are so we might well see a situation where during a glacial, we have a situation where the equatorial
region actually gets
warmer than during an interglacial.
And whether there will, in a
warmer world, be more or
less of that in tornado - prone
regions, during the tornado season, depends on the precise shifts that will take place in the jet stream — something that is extremely difficult to predict even with state - of - the - art theoretical climate models.
Still wondering how 100 + % of global
warming could be attributed to one variable, yet some
region's
warming can be caused by
less than that?
They found that open oceans are much
less efficient than sea ice when it comes to emitting in the far - infrared
region of the spectrum, a previously unknown phenomenon that is likely contributing to the
warming of the polar climate.
Shifts in clouds, water vapor, and the great currents in the ocean and air, however, cause complex responses in which some
regions warm more than the average while others
warm less than average, or even cool.
As the world
warms, the locations of these interactions will shift in space and time, bringing more severe conditions to some
regions and
less extreme conditions to others.
As expected, amounts of precipitable water are greatest over
warm, equatorial
regions and decrease more or
less continuously with increasing latitude down to very low values over the cold, polar
regions.
«The main incontrovertible effect of global
warming to date is that it has made those severely cold
regions slightly
less lethal to people and other living things.»
Just two degrees of
warming will double the length of extreme heatwaves and affect vulnerable
regions in just a few decades,» Eyasu warned, urging climate negotiators in Bonn to speed up reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and bolster efforts to aid
less developed countries.
In all these
regions, greenhouse gases are estimated to have caused generally increasing
warming as the century progressed, balanced to a greater or
lesser degree, depending on the
region, by cooling from sulfate aerosols in the middle of the century.»
During boreal winter (December 2016 to February 2017 - DJF) it was much
warmer than average throughout the Arctic, whereas in spring (March to May 2017 - MAM) the relative warmth was
less widespread, with a
region near the Greenland Sea being particularly cold relative to the average.
A fast rising temperature going through a
region would have
less time weight than a slowly decreasing temperature, so I think you would have to split it into cooling and
warming rates.
There are
regions of cooling in the 100 year gistemp trend map for March in northern Canada and in central Australia but is seems doubtful that these local cooling trends make a
warming attributable heat wave
less likely in those areas.
A stronger wind from the northwest brings
warmer conditions and therefore
less ice to the
region.
The researchers found that cumulus cloud towers produced
less cirrus clouds when they moved over
warmer ocean
regions.
While some
regions will experience
warmer winters, others might see more rain, or no rain, or
less snow, or stronger hurricanes, or weaker winds.