[18] The report determines that manmade greenhouse gas emissions will accelerate sea - level rise, increase the intensity and frequency of extreme weather, and
warm the planet at an unsustainable rate, adversely affecting everything from human and ecosystem health to transportation, forestry, and agriculture.
Source here In a late February (2017) interview on a U.S. news program, mechanical engineer Bill Nye claimed that the settled science says humans have been
warming the planet at a rate that is unnaturally and «catastrophically» fast since the year 1750.
Yes, AGW is real and indeed we humans are
warming the planet at a breathtaking rate.
Carbon dioxide is a trace gas, but it has increased by 40 % since the Industrial Revolution and is
warming our planet at an incredibly fast rate.
The basic physics of greenhouse gases are simply not one of those things that are not well - enough understood and if you don't understand how greenhouse gases work you can't possibly move on to any reasonable debate about other phenomena which can and do (IMO) largely negate the effects of increasing greenhouse gases and leave us in a situation where the modest increase in carbon dioxide has vast beneficial effect by
warming the planet at high latitudes where warming is welcome, not warming it at low latitudes where it is already warm enough, increasing the growth rate of green plants, and decreasing the water needs of green plants at the same time.
Not exact matches
«Adopting an ambitious amendment to phase down the use and production of hydrofluorocarbons — or HFCs — is likely the single most important step that we could take
at this moment to limit the
warming of our
planet,» Secretary of State John Kerry said in Kigali, in remarks before the passage of the agreement.
The EU considers itself
at the forefront of the fight against climate change and as a bloc it's on track to meet its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol, which limits the emissions of gases that
warm the
planet.
Trump has already moved to roll back many Obama - era initiatives aimed
at mitigating
planet -
warming emissions, claiming they will hold back economic growth and job creation.
The
planets orbit an «ultracool dwarf,» a star much smaller and cooler than the sun, but still possibly
warm enough to allow for liquid water on the surfaces of
at least two of the
planets.
If you care about the people in this world living closest to the margins, then you need to do everything in your power to slow the rate
at which the
planet warms, for they are the most vulnerable.
There's no value
at all from using enormous land and water resources and
warming the
planet in order to produce a billion tons of food that ultimately don't get eaten — particularly when one in nine people is malnourished in the world.
The more I read about the connection between our industrial food system and global
warming (See especially Anna Lappe's new book, Diet for a Hot
Planet), the more I become convinced of the tremendous importance of changing the way we feed our children
at school.
It obliges the UK to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by
at least 80 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels and to adapt to the risks associated with a
warming planet.
Back then, it said that the
planet was
warming at a rate of 0.2 C every decade — a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made by computer climate models.
The fires were costly for the rest of the
planet, too:
At their peak, the blazes belched more climate -
warming carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each day than did all U.S. economic activity.
Both methods suggest doubling CO2
warms the
planet by 2 °C
at least.
MAVEN arrived
at Mars in Sept. 2014 on a mission to investigate a planetary mystery: Billions of years ago, Mars was blanketed by layer of air massive enough to
warm the
planet and allow liquid water to flow on its surface.
Dan Hooper and Jason Steffen of Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, calculate that the dark matter that lies
at the heart of the galaxy could heat an alien world enough to make it habitable, even without the
warm glow of starlight (see «Dark matter could make
planets habitable»).
Scientists from Rice University and Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi's Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies have discovered that Earth's sea level did not rise steadily but rather in sharp, punctuated bursts when the
planet's glaciers melted during the period of global
warming at the close of the last ice age.
In fact, they are the bedrock measurements validating the fact that our
planet is
warming at all.
Raymond Pierrehumbert
at the University of Chicago and Eric Gaidos
at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu calculated the
warming effect of a hydrogen blanket on Earth - sized
planets, as well as on worlds a few times more massive than our own, known as super-Earths.
«We're finding
planets with ocean that, although cold
at the surface, are likely
warm at the bottom.
Roy Spencer, a climate scientist
at the University of Alabama who argued from the skeptical side, agrees that human contributed carbon dioxide lessens the
planet's ability to shed heat, meaning that
warming is likely.
Brendan Kelly, chief scientist
at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, noted that the
warming planet has also had dire effects on the Arctic, which unlike Antarctica, is home to 4 million permanent residents.
A new study takes aim
at the mysterious relationship between clouds and climate, and it finds that a
warmer planet could mean fewer clouds, which would mean an even more sultry future for the
planet
«The result is not a surprise, but if you look
at the global climate models that have been used to analyze what the
planet looked like 20,000 years ago — the same models used to predict global
warming in the future — they are doing, on average, a very good job reproducing how cold it was in Antarctica,» said first author Kurt Cuffey, a glaciologist
at the University of California, Berkeley, and professor of geography and of earth and planetary sciences.
«During last
warming period, Antarctica heated up two to three times more than
planet average: Amplification of
warming at poles consistent with today's climate change models.»
While a 16 - year - period is too short a time to draw conclusions about trends, the researchers found that
warming continued
at most locations on the
planet and during much of the year, but that
warming was offset by strong cooling during winter months in the Northern Hemisphere.
Named PH1, the
planet goes around two of the four stars, shown close - up here: One is a yellow - white F - type star that is slightly
warmer and more luminous than our sun; the other,
at the 11 o'clock position, is a red dwarf, cooler and dimmer than the sun.
(
At the time, the sun was as much as 6 % fainter than it is now, Lenton says, so the
planet -
warming effect of greenhouse gases wasn't as strong.)
It may seem surprising to people, but you can look
at something like Mars, which has a very thin atmosphere, and you can look
at something like Venus which we tend to think of as sort of having this rather heavy, clouded atmosphere, which [is] hellishly
warm because of runaway greenhouse effect, and on both of those
planets you are seeing this phenomenon of the atmosphere leaking away, is actually what directly has led to those very different outcomes for those
planets; the specifics of what happened as the atmosphere started to go in each case [made] all the difference.
They concluded that the upper levels of the
planet's oceans — those of the northern and southern hemispheres combined — had been
warming during several decades prior to 2005
at rates that were 24 to 58 percent faster than had previously been realized.
Launching his long - awaited plan to combat climate change today, Obama explicitly linked current hardships to our
planet's
warming trend: «Farmers see crops wilted one year, washed away the next, and the higher food prices get passed on to you,» he told an audience
at Georgetown University in Washington DC.
The
planet is
warming at an unprecedented rate and reducing emissions of greenhouse gasses alone is not enough to remove the risk.
Causes of
warming trends
at higher latitudes have gained more widespread attention from researchers in the past few decades, but the idea that the Arctic would
warm faster than the rest of the
planet has been around for more than 100 years.
These effects may not only lead to stronger
warming at the north of our
planet, but also
at the south polar region.
In climate science, for example, where we don't need an elaborate climate model to understand the basic physics and chemistry of greenhouse gases, so
at some level the fact that increased CO2
warms the
planet is a consequence of very basic physics and chemistry.
Over a simulated interval of 200 million years, the inner
planet slowly migrated even farther inward to become a «
warm Jupiter» orbiting its parent star
at about the same distance Mercury does in our solar system, the researchers report online today in Science.
At the same time, Trump refused to be pinned down on the scientific consensus that humans are
warming the
planet, invoking debunked information about emails stolen from climate scientists in 2009, American factories burdened by regulations and his engineer uncle.
Climate models do not predict an even
warming of the whole
planet: changes in wind patterns and ocean currents can change the way heat is distributed, leading to some parts
warming much faster than average, while a few may cool,
at least
at first.
Emissions of a greenhouse gas that has 17,000 times the
planet -
warming capacity of carbon dioxide are
at least four times higher than had been previously estimated.
This trend continues a long - term
warming of the
planet, according to an analysis of surface temperature measurements by scientists
at NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) in New York.
Beaver ponds can indeed be large sources of potent
planet -
warming greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide, says Jennifer Edmonds, an aquatic ecologist
at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
It lays out myriad dangers associated with a
warming planet and potential policy prescriptions in a way that seemed new and galvanizing
at the time.
They found that stabilising the increase
at 1.5 °C would lead to seas rising less, and more slowly, than if the
planet was allowed to
warm by 2 °C.
Professor Drijfhout said: «The
planet earth recovers from the AMOC collapse in about 40 years when global
warming continues
at present - day rates, but near the eastern boundary of the North Atlantic (including the British Isles) it takes more than a century before temperature is back to normal.»
But the researchers say that
at the very least climate models need to reflect this latest nuance of our
warming planet.
A complete failure of the agreement
at this point, with business - as - usual growth for another decade, would almost certainly commit the
planet to significantly more
warming than the Paris goals, and the human consequences of this would be catastrophic.
«Global climate change involves not just a
warming planet, but also increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations and changes in rainfall,» said lead author Lauren Smith - Ramesh, a postdoctoral fellow
at NIMBioS.
«Without the existence of these proteins that could help phytoplankton cope in these stressful environments, the phytoplankton diversity in many regions of the ocean would be much lower, in particular by reducing large phytoplankton such as diatoms that are known to take up a lot of carbon dioxide, thus possibly accelerating the pace of a
warming planet,» said Marchetti, assistant professor of marine science
at UNC - Chapel Hill.