Over the past two million years, Earth has experienced long glacial periods separated by short,
warmer intervals known as interglacials.
Not exact matches
And it's possible that we are currently no
warmer than we were a thousand years ago, during the «Medieval
Warm Period» or «Medieval Optimum,» an interval of warm conditions known from historical records and indirect evidence like tree ri
Warm Period» or «Medieval Optimum,» an
interval of
warm conditions known from historical records and indirect evidence like tree ri
warm conditions
known from historical records and indirect evidence like tree rings.
The research, led by Chronis Tzedakis of University College, London, examined similarities between the current
warm interval between ice ages and a particular point, around 780,000 years ago, during a past
warm period
known as Marine Isotope Stage 19.
«We also present a set of global vulnerability drivers that are
known with high confidence: (1) droughts eventually occur everywhere; (2)
warming produces hotter droughts; (3) atmospheric moisture demand increases nonlinearly with temperature during drought; (4) mortality can occur faster in hotter drought, consistent with fundamental physiology; (5) shorter droughts occur more frequently than longer droughts and can become lethal under
warming, increasing the frequency of lethal drought nonlinearly; and (6) mortality happens rapidly relative to growth
intervals needed for forest recovery.
The answer, Izen, is of course that when Obama held his «5 to 10 years global
warming acceleration» speech, he had not the faintest idea that 5 years is a totally irrelevant
interval when talking about decades long climate trends; and he doesn't have the faintest idea about that because he wouldn't
know a physical unit if it crawled up his nose and died there.A trend over 5 years is not much better than noise, and detecting an ACCELERATION with such a noisy trend is entirely impossible.
When this is done, people usually find that while it was relatively cool in global mean temperatures from the 1400s to the 1800s
known as the «Little Ice Age» and relatively mild in the 900s to 1300s
interval (sometimes termed the «Medieval
Warm Period»).
Note that now we are
no longer considering the entire history of the earth, we are only considering the changes in magnitude during the modern
warming interval.
CO2 better than HFC Instead of HFC, the machines use CO2, which in this case they estimate to be 1,300 times less potent a greenhouse gas than HFC (over a certain
interval of time, the measurement is also
known as GWP, or global
warming potential).
I'd like to
know if both global
warming & global cooling are concurrent, and the only difference between an Ice Age and an Interglacial are which one is winning more than the other one at any given time
interval, right down to year - by - year.