Sentences with phrase «warmer temps there»

But note, I haven't measured clear sky temp on a warm day, it is suppose to be much closer to surface temp, but at warmer temps there's much more water vapor in the air.

So it looks like you're having warm temps there, too — it's going to be in the 60s this weekend in NY / NJ — so weird!

Not exact matches

Mmmm I could go for a warm bowl of soup, even though temps are warmer than usual and there isn't snow on the ground (odd for Mn this time of year).

Hooray for spring weather — glad the warmer temps are making their way there!

In spirit, and as a paper cutout, Rea was there taking in the smell of the pine, the unusually warm temps and all the plant - based goodness with us.

There was no reason for him to stay on the warmer, as his temp was holding fine with me.

Also not all places are warming in lock - step; it's the average temp that going up, and (I think) it's even possible there could be greater variance or extremes (hotter hots, colder colds), as the average continues to go up (but I'm no scientist, and I don't really know).

There are conflicting opinions about what temperature is best for lemon water, but I prefer just a bit warmer than room temp.

What are the ways you've been spending time as a family now that there are some warmer temps on the horizon?

I really need spring to get here with its warm temps, pleasant breezes, colorful flowers... and yet there is another storm heading our way.

Being from Arizona, I am a huge fan of warm temps, but there is nothing better than the leaves changing from shades of green, to yellow, orange and red.

There is something about warmer temps and the sun staying out just a wee bit longer that makes me so happy and itching for a longer weekend.

The temps have not gone above 70, the sun is warm, and there's been a steady breeze.

When the holidays are approaching and the temps are crawling dangerously close to the negatives, there's literally nothing better to do than stay warm in your cozy home.

There's something about the time change, fresh blooms and warmer temps in the air that are an instant mood lifter!

There's no such benefactor waiting in the wings for Frances, yet the beauty of Noah Baumbach's warmest film to date is that it's perceptive about the shame of being theoretically poor among rich friends, and uncondescending: catering jobs and temp work, after all, are not the end of the world.

There is occasionally some seasonal fog along the coast but if you are craving some warmer temps, a short drive on a country road is the perfect mini-day trip to temps that can be 40 degrees warmer at times.

Renowned for having the warmest winter pool in Noosa at a temp of 31 degrees, Spa pool at 36 degrees and children's wading pool also at 31 degrees, there is simply no better holiday destination in Noosa to escape the winter chill.

Although the pattern correlation is high, there are clear offsets in summer - time mid-continental temperatures (the model temps being up to 5 deg C too warm in places).

And in some articles where I have read that it is being observed, often historical data shows those cities and / or regions to have been warmer in the past century, which would seem to indicate (1) the permafrost issue isn't new or necessarily unnatural and / or (2) there is a substantial lag between permafrost melting and rising temps (ie, the current permafrost melt is mostly or all natural).

In THE orbit the earth travels around the sun, the temp is -93 C — that» cold vacuum» penetrates trough the upper troposphere and is canceling any heat — IF there is heat to neutralize — if not, just zooms trough underutilized, and» new cold vacuum» moves trough every 10 minutes — because the planet travels at 108000kmh trough new» cold vacuum» all the time = the planet can not get warmer than normal.»

(And remember, you can not could use a properly purged temp record to show how much warming there has actually been, and during which periods of time)

I plotted GISP2 for the whole Holocene and plotted GRIP on a uniform timeline from 1855 to 2009 by simply starting with the 1857 GRIP temp which was quite a bit warmer than the 1855 GISP2 temp, and plotted from there.

If one looks at 400 mb temps on the UAH site over the past 10 years, there has been no change, though years with the el nino it is warmer than normal, years with a la nina cooler.

Rising Carbon Dioxide has warmed temps... so there is added plant growth in far northern and far southern latitudes.

If there was a one off event such as an undersea eruption that warmed the ocean enough to leave a.5 c rise on the temp record, should your warming due to CO2 graph, restart at a point.5 c higher and then continue its climb?

Or even our illustrious host, who testifies before Congress that because there has been a short - term flattening out of a longer term trend of rising increase in temps, therefore there is a «hiatus» in «global warming?»

«One of the major modes of climate variability is El Niño and when we're in El Niño there's a large area of warm sea surface temps in the Pacific,» this leads to more precipitation on the West Coast, Crouch said.

All he can really say is what he has, that in his area of glaciers the temps were higher during the early Holocene by the fossil remains of trees which subsequent cooling killed off, but he has not shown that temps were subsequently never warmer until present — these fossil remains could well have been uncovered during such times as the lesser warming of the MWP but conditions there not conducive to re-establishment of trees before the next cooling period arrived.

Thus, there can not be a «pause» or a «stop» in global warming to accompany increased ACO2 emissions — although there certainly could be a «standstill» in the trend of increasing surface temps (which would be consistent with AGW theory).

As far as air temps based on the instrument record, there are some dubious conditions which I have personally observed with especially siting of official recording sites (e.g., ASOS, AWOS sites), even though there are certainly some qualitative evidence of general warming.

After looking at the scatter plot, not only was there no tread, the quadrant «warmer & drier» had the fewest data of all (20); «warmer & wetter» had the most (32); the driest year had a negative temp anomaly, and the wettest year a positive temp anomaly.

THERE HAS BEEN A WARMING TREND FROM THE 70s THRU THE LATE 90s,... accompanied by other changes tied to a warming trend (record low arctic sea ice extent & thickness, retreating glaciers, retreating snow lines, warming ocean surface temps, increases in sea height, de-alkalinizing oWARMING TREND FROM THE 70s THRU THE LATE 90s,... accompanied by other changes tied to a warming trend (record low arctic sea ice extent & thickness, retreating glaciers, retreating snow lines, warming ocean surface temps, increases in sea height, de-alkalinizing owarming trend (record low arctic sea ice extent & thickness, retreating glaciers, retreating snow lines, warming ocean surface temps, increases in sea height, de-alkalinizing owarming ocean surface temps, increases in sea height, de-alkalinizing oceans).

But the risk is certainly real — while there may be benefits to warming in parts of the world, any kind of significant, long - lasting climate change to a world of > 7billion people optimized for current temps will be dangerous.

If the Ocean slowly cools with radiant heat loss to space via warmer Arctic waters and a discernible decrease in atmospheric temps the last 1.5 years since the Super El Nino of 2016, then there should be more atmospheric CO2 uptake by cooling oceans.

They constantly repeat as a scratched record:» climate sensitivity — climate sensitivity» — but are scared to acknowledge; the sensitivity of oxygen & nitrogen in expanding / shrinking in change of temperature + the speeding of» vertical winds» when gets warmer close to the ground - and what's the temp up there, where they expand when warmed extra.

If more energy is retained in the system (which there is, based on e.g. satellite measurements of the radfiation budget, OHC changes, temp measurements, cryospheric meas) it stands to reason that as a response the system will probably warm up.

I have no quibbles with this work but why, when prof muller says there may have been an MWP warmer than today, would he claim the recent rise in temp is almost certainly due to CO2?

Just to let you know how stupid the global warming activists are, I've been to the south pole 3 times and even there, where the water vapor is under 0.2 mm precipitable, it's still the H2O that is the main concern in our field and nobody even talks about CO2 because CO2 doesn't absorb or radiate in the portion of the spectrum corresponding with earth's surface temps of 220 to 320 K. Not at all.

There is a temperature gradient caused by atmospheric radiations — warm air rises, expands and cools in lower pressure at height — but this is just the lapse rate and doesn't create cooler temps at height.

I'm alternately told by «skeptics» (1) it's regional impact that's important, (2) it's global data that's more important, (3) there is no such thing as «global temperatures,» (4) «skeptics» are not monolithic, (5) «skeptics» don't doubt that global temperatures are warming (and that it is to some extent influenced by AC02), or alternately «we dismiss non-Global data), (6) all methodologyies used to determine global temps are unreliable, (7) global warming has stopped, (8) we're experiencing global cooling, (9) what matters is long term trends, (10) short - term trends are significant, (11) what's happening in Arctic isn't important (because it's regional), (12) what's happening in the Antarctic is important (despite it being regional).

Climate Depot Analysis: «There have been at least seven separate explanations for the standstill in global warming» — 1) Low Solar Activity; 2) Oceans Ate Warming; 3) Chinese Coal Use; 4) Montreal Protocol; 5) Readjusted past temps to claim «pause» never existed 6) Volcanoes 7) Decline in Watewarming» — 1) Low Solar Activity; 2) Oceans Ate Warming; 3) Chinese Coal Use; 4) Montreal Protocol; 5) Readjusted past temps to claim «pause» never existed 6) Volcanoes 7) Decline in WateWarming; 3) Chinese Coal Use; 4) Montreal Protocol; 5) Readjusted past temps to claim «pause» never existed 6) Volcanoes 7) Decline in Water Vapor

500 years of temps warmer than today (Greenland had inhabitants then but you can not live there like they did then today).

What we all suspected UHI does have a tremendous effect on surface temps reading so we can conclude maybe 50 % of the warming not significant well in the USA there is no AGW so ther is no global either AGW thank you Mr watts

I'd like to state at the outset that that I consider myself a luke warmer, have am convinced that the Hockey Stick has basically been proven to be an outright fraud, that Climategate shows much of current climate science to lack any credibility, and acknowledge that there does appear to have been a lot of tampering with surface temp record, always aimed at getting the same (warming) result.

«What we all suspected UHI does have a tremendous effect on surface temps reading so we can conclude maybe 50 % of the warming not significant well in the USA there is no AGW so ther is no global either AGW thank you Mr wats»

- I thought mass was trending up due to increased precipitation that goes with the warmer temps associated with global warming down there.

But what the actual data shows is there is no warming trend in max temps at all, and min temps flutter around regionally not globally.

There is no possible way that she is correct about Arctic temps being as warm in the 1930's.

There was cooling, but then an el nino response and overall a general warm period in the tropical Pacific that ended with the Super Nino and the earths temps reaching a peak.