Sentences with phrase «warmer temps which»

I'm just ready for spring (or at least some sunshine and warmer temps which I see on the forecast for this week... thank goodness!).

Not exact matches

We have had an usually warm week here in Wyoming... The temps have been in the 70s with little wind, which is highly unusual for March!

I PICKED A PRETTY BLUE AND GREEN SHADE OF PUMPKIN, HOPING TO MAKE MY FALL DECORATING A LITTLE CHEAPER THIS YEAR!First off I'll start by telling you we had a 55 degree day on Sunday so I made the best of the warm temps, which felt like a summer's day here in the mitten state.

I spent last weekend in Tampa, which was so nice to enjoy warmer temps and catch some sunshine, but with travel comes lots of catching up, so...

So at idle on a warm day, say 35 * C air intake temp the breakdown voltage will be about 14kV plus 2kV for the waste spark which gives about 16kv total.

The warmer temps are finally here to stay, which means it's time to start planning your summer fun!

Water Temp — Bearded dragons are reptiles, which means they are cold blooded, so they will need very warm water.

-- It is the equi - lib - rium temp response that's most important — which (I guess Padilla means) would include carbon feedbacks from the warming, such as from melting hydrates and permafrost, or perhaps the lag time for the climate to adjust to all the GHGs in the atmosphere.

The Paramagnetic Oxygen Transport Thesis explains the failure of Brewer - Dobson equatorial ozone formation, the Ozone Hole in 1983, continued Antarctic cold temps concurrent with Arctic warming, mid-latitude ozone formation which accelerates jet streams and elongates Rossby wave loops, and wandering magnetic poles which control extreme weather and climate change.

And in some articles where I have read that it is being observed, often historical data shows those cities and / or regions to have been warmer in the past century, which would seem to indicate (1) the permafrost issue isn't new or necessarily unnatural and / or (2) there is a substantial lag between permafrost melting and rising temps (ie, the current permafrost melt is mostly or all natural).

I believe I provided a figure someone had come up with which correlated the number of additional deaths to be expected for a one degree drop in avg winter temps, and it stands to reason one could easily reverse that and determine how many lives were saved annually thanks to warmer temps.

IF daily solar heating causes (effective) convective feedback — to reesablish in = out, then why doesn't GHG warming which adds 3 + degrees to the ground temp ALSO cause convective feedback.

I thought it would be something like that, although for a moment I thought Dr Vicki Pope from the Met Office was running a version of her old little graph of global temps, which is aired every now & then, curiously stopped in 2007, demonstrating beyond a doubt the warming going on as usual, just before the 2008 temp step drop & further cooling in 09, so that the trend stayed positive!

(And remember, you can not could use a properly purged temp record to show how much warming there has actually been, and during which periods of time)

However, this warming eventually leads to additional cloud formation which leads to increased albedo - thus cooler temps.

I plotted GISP2 for the whole Holocene and plotted GRIP on a uniform timeline from 1855 to 2009 by simply starting with the 1857 GRIP temp which was quite a bit warmer than the 1855 GISP2 temp, and plotted from there.

Despite factors against warming in the 2000s, Smith et all predicted natural variation would suppress GHG warming in the initial years of their prediction, 2005 and 2010 were both warmer than 1998 on the two American temp series, both of which do well in comparison to the BEST land series.

Or it could be that the leveling of 21st century temps is because the sun is a much bigger player than the modelers assume, in which case the imminent danger is cooling, not warming, but these cowards refuse to even consider the possibility.

Which conveniently ignores Science News» Oct. 5th article: Global warming hiatus tied to cooler temps in Pacific, which states «The recent pause in global warming has resulted from cooling in the tropical Pacific Ocean, new simulations Which conveniently ignores Science News» Oct. 5th article: Global warming hiatus tied to cooler temps in Pacific, which states «The recent pause in global warming has resulted from cooling in the tropical Pacific Ocean, new simulations which states «The recent pause in global warming has resulted from cooling in the tropical Pacific Ocean, new simulations find.

What does this tell us about the underlying forcing causing the warmer temps duirng periods in which the atmosphere is in general getting less energy from the ocean?

The discussion I had recently about this had been irritating, so many examples in my research which showed the faked Hockey Stick cause was alive and well and now not just eliminating the warmer periods like the MWP and Roman, but taking it even further back and ludicrously even positing that temps now were rising higher than at any time in the Holocene, but the 6/7, 000 year had been a first step to this, eliminating the Holocene Maximum by clever sleights of hand and word play.

All he can really say is what he has, that in his area of glaciers the temps were higher during the early Holocene by the fossil remains of trees which subsequent cooling killed off, but he has not shown that temps were subsequently never warmer until present — these fossil remains could well have been uncovered during such times as the lesser warming of the MWP but conditions there not conducive to re-establishment of trees before the next cooling period arrived.

«All he can really say is what he has, that in his area of glaciers the temps were higher during the early Holocene by the fossil remains of trees which subsequent cooling killed off, but he has not shown that temps were subsequently never warmer until present — these fossil remains could well have been uncovered during such times as the lesser warming of the MWP»

As you say, convection uses up a lot of energy too and also counters the idea of radiative heat transfer as a big ticket item because «hot» CO2 molecules only remain so for a brief fraction of a second before they collide with N2 or O2 to warm that localised parcel of air; which then rises to attain equilibrium T somewhere higher and at a COLDER temp so no rad Transf!!!

Thus, there can not be a «pause» or a «stop» in global warming to accompany increased ACO2 emissions — although there certainly could be a «standstill» in the trend of increasing surface temps (which would be consistent with AGW theory).

As far as air temps based on the instrument record, there are some dubious conditions which I have personally observed with especially siting of official recording sites (e.g., ASOS, AWOS sites), even though there are certainly some qualitative evidence of general warming.

But these large reservoirs of heat warm the air over them, that warm air and water vapor is then transported over land, which adds to surface temps.

One, the overall warming trend is enhanced, which is then attributed to increased CO2 by the government agency scientists, versus stating that their underlying temp adjustments were the real «enhancement» cause.

That temp rise then causes something to outgas CO2 (possibly oceans, but maybe not) that then raises the temp even more (along with other GHG that feedback and enhance the warming), which causes more outgasing.

If more energy is retained in the system (which there is, based on e.g. satellite measurements of the radfiation budget, OHC changes, temp measurements, cryospheric meas) it stands to reason that as a response the system will probably warm up.

I have real life experience where a thin veil of high cirrus, which I am fairly certain are colder than the ground, led to an almost immediate and quite welcome warming of the ground temp, during radiation cooling events here in Florida.

However, since the shell is at a higher temp than background, though probably not by a lot, (background ~ 3 DegK, which is effectively = 0 for this problem), less heat would be transferred to the shell, and the earth would consequently retain more of it and so it would warm slightly.

NASA's «GISS» temp uses land and ocean - based thermometers which measure «different parts of the system [UHI affected parking lots, asphalt heat sinks, AC exhaust air vents], different signal to noise ratio [we bias toward warm stations], different structural uncertainty [we «homogenise» our data set to cool the past and warm the present to fit the global warming narrative].»

We have 20 million years of temp and CO2 levels from the geologic record which is why we know for certain that it is CO2 that is causing the warming.

But, you're making the same claim that this is the cause of the pause, when it's more likely that a positive AMO and PDO both simultaneously warmed the Northern Hemisphere at the end of the 20th century, the History of the late 30's had the same high temps (and melted Arctic), which were followed by cold PDO phase.

Especially toasty temps also enveloped Australia, which experienced its second warmest April on record.

In terms of keeping you warm though, even in hOMe which is on the larger spectrum of tiny houses, we stay toasty warm even when it's -10 F. Granted we don't go all the way down to your temps but perhaps you can try it without first and see how it goes?

And Figure 6.10 b shows the mean values for all those different proxy reconstructions, the warmest of which has a MWP temp anomaly of about +0.1 & degC.

Warmer Temps Likely to Blame The original paper gives a number of examples which show that changes in land use, precipitation, cloudiness and humidity are superimposed on glaciers similar to those of Kilimanjaro, in terms of latitude, and that something else is at work... «most obvious would be warmer air temperatures&rWarmer Temps Likely to Blame The original paper gives a number of examples which show that changes in land use, precipitation, cloudiness and humidity are superimposed on glaciers similar to those of Kilimanjaro, in terms of latitude, and that something else is at work... «most obvious would be warmer air temperatures&rwarmer air temperatures».

This created a kind of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde relationship between winter and summer in which high Arctic winter temps seemed outrageously warmer than normal even as summer snapped back to more typical Arctic averages in the furthest north locations.

Hello friends, the temps in Maryland have been extremely warm this September, but they are slowing dropping which really gets me in the mood to do a bit more Fall decorating... yippee!