Sentences with phrase «warming some scientists believe»

Global warming Some scientists believe there is a rise in CO 2 levels (carbon dioxide).

Though such additional warming will have both positive and negative consequences for human beings and other life on the planet, global warming scientists believe that the negative consequences far outweigh the positive consequences.

Though the greenhouse effect itself is completely natural, and very beneficial, global warming scientists believe that anthropogenic (man - made) emissions of carbon dioxide (mostly from burning fossil fuels) have increased CO2 in the atmosphere to a point where we are now experiencing what could be called an «enhanced greenhouse effect».

Not exact matches

As for pundits the Merson types are like climate scientists who deny global warming is anthropgenic, not because they really believe it but because it gets them exposure in the media which they wouldn't get if they simply went along with the crowd.

Fifth, the right wing websites, who would never be caught dead reading a hostile left wing website and who would never read anything written by actual scientists (who they consider to either be part of the liberal elite or part of an ill - defined conspiracy), never hear about what poor science the study they're celebrating actually is, and go right on believing that their anti-global warming position is so obviously correct that everyone else must either be fools or conspirators.I believe the link pfft posted is step three.

Points 2 and 3 might lead to their not believing in global warming, but when faced by such an overwhelming majority of scientist who believe it, it seems (to me) almost like a conspiracy theory to deny it.

Scientists now believe that the projected decreases in the polar sea ice due to global warming will have a significant negative impact or even lead to extinction of this species within this century.

With previous studies showing that higher temperatures, caused by global warming, have led to more unstable mountain rocks — the scientists, who took part in the new study, believe that using the two monitoring techniques together could prove vital for thousands of skiers and mountain climbers who undertake trips every year.

Now we are told to believe main stream scientists about Global Warming?

If you believe, along with almost every scientist who has studied the issue, that global warming poses a genuine threat to humanity, doesn't this suggest that we should be doing something about it?

«So far, I believe the benefits (of Arctic warming) outweigh the potential problems,» said Oleg Anisimov, a Russian scientist who co-authored a chapter about the impacts of climate change in polar regions for a U.N. report on global warming this year.

Finney believes that changes in climate cause the cycles in salmon populations, and as scientists struggle to understand the rate and effects of global warming, salmon may help them distinguish normal climate variations from the early warnings of a system gone dangerously wrong.

The findings also suggest that previous techniques using satellites to measure drought stress in rainforests may be missing dire impacts of a warming global climate, which many scientists believe will cause more droughts in those critical habitats.

Many scientists believe that global warming will prompt animals and plants of the Northern Hemisphere to shift their ranges northward (or, in the Southern Hemisphere, southward).

Scientists believe this is an important contribution to warming in the region, but it's not the only one.

Another principal investigator for the project, Laura Pan, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., believes storm clusters over this area of the Pacific are likely to influence climate in new ways, especially as the warm ocean temperatures (which feed the storms and chimney) continue to heat up and atmospheric patterns continue to evolve.

The negative side is, as one of my right - wing Facebook friends remarked: If the scientists get gravity waves wrong, why should we believe them on global warming?

For example, in a simulated world where the atmospheric CO2 levels were double today's values — a scenario many scientists believe likely — models predict that Earth will warm by more than 2 °C.

«I do not know the source of that original document, but I assume it was sent to me because of my past exchanges with Heartland and because I was named in it,» said the scientist who has sparred often with Heartland and others who do not believe in the scientific underpinnings of man - made global warming.

This has created a growing pessimism within the scientific community, with the Guardian reporting that almost nine out of 10 climate scientists don't believe political efforts to restrict global warming to 2º Celsius will succeed.

Scientists do not believe Antarctica is in a precipitous state of warming right now.

Some scientists believe the ice sheet experienced significant melting during the relatively warmer conditions of the Pliocene, while others think it has remained almost entirely frozen for the last 14 million years.

However, a new University of Minnesota study with more than 1,000 young trees has found that plants also adjust — or acclimate — to a warmer climate and may release only one - fifth as much additional carbon dioxide than scientists previously believed, The study, published today in the journal Nature, is based on a five - year project, known as «B4Warmed,» that simulated the effects of climate change on 10 boreal and temperate tree species growing in an open - air setting in 48 plots in two forests in northern Minnesota.

Tadeusz Patzek, an engineering professor at Berkeley who formerly worked as a scientist at Shell, believes the deal compromises the university's ability to look objectively at long - term energy solutions to global warming.

Soon is a leading skeptic of the widely accepted science surrounding climate change, In the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, a study titled «The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change» found that 97 percent of scientists surveyed believed global warming already is ongoing, with 84 percent of scientists surveyed believing human - produced greenhouse gases were the driving force behind the change.

Scientists believe global warming might get worse if the oceans soak up less of the greenhouse gas.

Scientists believe climate change — the warming of oceans — has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles and other pests to spread to new latitudes.

The UN's IPCC misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider.

And this is on top of ongoing efforts by the administration aimed at «preventing scientists who believe there might be such a link [between global warming and more intense hurricanes] from speaking out.»

The Keeling Curve, a famous graph named after scientist Charles David Keeling, measures the increase in carbon dioxide concentration in the air since 1958; it is considered the bedrock of global warming science because it is generally believed that there is a direct correlation between increasing levels of carbon dioxide and global warming.

8 John said, «Of the 62 % of people that aren't completely isolated from reality: 28 % believe scientists are overstating the evidence about «Global Warming»»

But, you also know that whenever a major climate related disaster happens, the media will ask scientists whether it's related to global warming, and that these disasters will be used to justify Kyoto, and that the immediacy of the benefit can easily be overstressed to the point where many people do believe that Bush's refusal to sign Kyoto directly caused Katrina or at least made it noticeably worse.

For those who firmly believe that scientists are going full speed ahead to cherry - pick evidence that supports catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, Andy has provided the megaphone for the objective (and un-biased) voice of the scientific community as a whole.

I am not a climate scientist but I believe that global warming is a catastrophic threat to humanity and that we are responsible.

can see no other reasonable interpretation of these statements than that the scientists believe their experiments show we're in much more trouble over global warming than previously thought

We have compiled a list of over 100 respected scientists in climatology and related fields who do NOT believe that the facts are clear and that the science concerning global warming is settled.

Via Earth2Tech More Transportation Articles Rasmussen Survey: Nobody Listens to Scientists, Only 34 % of US Voters Believe Global Warming is Caused by Human Activity Toyota to Cut New Prius Hybrid Base Price to $ 21,000, Offer 5 Trim Levels EU Closes Car Air Conditioner Regulatory Loophole, Earth's Climate Wins Toyota Claims Over 20,000 Pre-Orders for 2010 Toyota Prius Hybrid Breathtaking!

Keep in mind that the IEA's «450 Scenario» is intended to limit warming to 2 °C — even though we can plainly see that the warming that has already occurred is sufficient to cause far worse effects than scientists imagined possible only a few years ago, and we have every reason to believe that 2 °C will be truly catastrophic.

I often wonder how so many people can not believe what many scientists report about global warming.

He's already called for a moratorium on all regulations, blasted the chairman of the Federal Reserve as «treasonous», and, now, he's stating outright that he believes global warming is a hoax stirred up by scientists who «manipulated data».

Combining the answers from other questions, 47 % of all respondents believe «that scientists are overstating evidence about global warming for their own interests».

Leading climate scientists believe that maintaining carbon dioxide levels in excess of 350 ppm will result in runaway global warming with catastrophic impacts to humans, wildlife and ecosystems.

I suspect one of the reasons that he brought it up is that the general public, when told there is no debate amongst experts as to whether warming is occurring, are also told that the hundreds of scientists they hear about in the news dismissing warming (or saying that there is a debate) are not climate change experts and therefore shouldn't be believed.

Steve McIntyre: «If you are not a climate scientist (or a realclimate reader), you would almost certainly believe, from your own experience, that cities are warmer than the surrounding countryside From that, itâ s easy to conclude that as cities become bigger and as towns become cities and villages become towns, that there is a widespread impact on urban records from changes in landscape, which have to be considered before you can back out what portion is due to increased GHG.

Look around — anyone that continues to believe that there is no consensus amongst scientists that human activity is warming the planet was duped, and continues to be duped, at least in part by this man.

Of the 62 % of people that aren't completely isolated from reality: 28 % believe scientists are overstating the evidence about «Global Warming» and 34 % believe the media is overstating the evidence about «Global Warming».

So, if I write an article about this in Examiner (which no one reads anyway — ha), what do I say to the commenter who says, «Gee, every time I bring up the name of a «scientist» who disputes warming, I get told he's not an expert and doesn't know what he's talking about, so why should I believe this other non-climate change expert who doesn't dispute warming?

To veterans of the Climate Wars, the old 1970s global cooling canard — «How can we believe climate scientists about global warming today when back in the 1970s they told us an ice age was imminent?»

That's why scientists don't believe that an increase in the strength of sunlight is causing the warming of the Earth.

This is encouraging, because the 25 % who do not «believe» that temperatures have risen are plainly in denial; the evidence for warming is so strong that just about all the prominent so - called sceptic scientists acknowledge it.